Izkata

27 ms·

721.
by Izkata 1y ago
Those criteria sound like they should disqualify the person who actually got it.
722.
by Izkata 1y ago
> and they asked whether that's a codebase smell... Something that's been an issue with our most junior dev, he's heard a lot of terminology but never really learned what some of those terms mean, so he'll use them in
723.
by Izkata 1y ago
The "in some circles of the fast-moving Javascript world" is important - they're not saying everyone or even most, they're saying proponents of the "better" systems (who do rewrite regularly) dismiss React&#x27
724.
by Izkata 1y ago
Wasn't a breaking change, and that was introduced like 7 or 8 years ago, I think? Been kind of a long time in Javascript-land.
725.
by Izkata 1y ago
Yep, 180 degree rotation.
726.
by Izkata 1y ago
It's more complicated than "this cable is good/bad". I had a suspicion about one of my cables for months, but just last week I confirmed it with a device that shows the volts/amps/watts/total kwh passing
727.
by Izkata 1y ago
It's a declarative language, not an imperative/functional language. You describe the desired end result, the browser figures out how to lay things out to fit all the constraints. And this: > but it's pretty much a bunch o
728.
by Izkata 1y ago
Firefox had an addon for that before Quantum killed so many addons. https://betanews.com/2014/07/12/view-all-your-firefox-tabs-a...
729.
by Izkata 1y ago
I have this vague memory of a blog where someone went through various CSS resets, and came to the conclusion that margins and paddings made up something like 90%+ of the differences between browsers. Apparently only "* { margin: 0; pa
730.
by Izkata 1y ago
Facebook got modernized multiple times and doesn't look at all like it did 20 years ago.
731.
by Izkata 1y ago
That explanation doesn't make sense because they are doing that: there's a few groups that explicitly rip and share Crunchyroll's subtitles (one is mentioned in the article).
732.
by Izkata 1y ago
From the searching I was just doing, I have seen a couple people specifically say Skype and MSN Messenger had it before they switched to using unicode emoji. No screenshots, though. Also I'm pretty sure we started calling them emoji i
733.
by Izkata 1y ago
COBOL was the same, wasn't it?
734.
by Izkata 1y ago
That's politics in the office, not office politics. But you are right that the author is mixing things up: Office politics isn't collaboration as described in the article. Office politics refers to things like one-upmanship, tak
735.
by Izkata 1y ago
Yeah, kinda happened like a decade-plus ago, when facebook opened up to everyone. I know I stopped using it when my parents (baby boomers) got on there.
736.
by Izkata 1y ago
11 states in the US have two-party-consent laws. IIRC GP is correct about recordings of private conversations in these states.
737.
by Izkata 1y ago
Just an additional clarification in case the other reply doesn't help: Your phrasing of "shows me a black formation" doesn't make sense unless it is rendering the page wrong for you. All the problems you've listed
738.
by Izkata 1y ago
IIRC that was mostly the adults, or older teenagers, who don't get a lot of screen time so their designs are simplified? It kind of follows a general trope in manga/anime where characters' eyes are smaller or thinner to indic
739.
by Izkata 1y ago
Also, the manga goes a bit longer past the end of the anime.
740.
by Izkata 1y ago
As someone who has read code as easily as English for decades (which is apparently rare, if my co-workers are any indication), too many type annotations clutter it up and make it a lot harder to read. And this is after having used Typescri
741.
by Izkata 1y ago
Except Typescript embraces duck typing. You can say "accept any object with a quack() method", for example, and it'll accept an unexpected quacking parrot. It can even tell when two type definitions are close enough and merg
742.
by Izkata 1y ago
They are passing "prefix", "ending", and "extraNames" in an object. It's just defined inline in the function and using destructuring so the function can access the keys by name without having to put the o
743.
by Izkata 1y ago
The model is dragging the head itself as if it is a joystick. Left and right don't swap, but arrow up maps to forward, which tilts the head down.
744.
by Izkata 1y ago
Put your finger on top of the character's head. Left and right are still left and right, but forward (up on the controls because of how they're positioned) makes the character look down and backward makes the character look up.
745.
by Izkata 1y ago
When I was a kid, all the controls by default were what is now called "inverted Y-axis" and rarely had an option to change it. I think it flipped around the 2010s, I remember being confused when I bought my Switch and got back in
746.
by Izkata 1y ago
> as it zooms around the character's head. This is a third-person camera. First-person is strictly seeing from the character's eyes.
747.
by Izkata 1y ago
Yes, it's exactly this - and not even a joystick thing. The control is forward and backwards, not up and down, like pushing the top of your head forward to look down. This mapping makes it act like the other controls, controlling the
748.
by Izkata 1y ago
I haven't changed any of that on here. Looks like I consistently get just the static image when I open in a new tab then switch to it, but then if I refresh the page without switching tabs it'll show the animation.
749.
by Izkata 1y ago
Firefox on Android seems to just be a static image, I can't see any text.
750.
by Izkata 1y ago
Fun fact: hjkl are in the same order as the arrows on screen in Dance Dance Revolution.

More ›