ItendToDisagree

35 ms·

301.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Isn't that because it was scheduled as illegal? Circular logic is fun!
302.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
More research seems like a really good side benefit if it happens. Inhaling burning plant matter is still bad for you. There are alternate means of ingesting the compounds in Marijuana though.
303.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
What are the answers? Is there a back of the book? Give up the goods! This (OP) is one of the funniest HN submissions I've ever seen for comments. What does this have to do with HN?
304.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Doesn't 'Medical Grade' just mean high quality? IANAS but there are lots of different levels of quality right? Like in Pulp Fiction? "That one's a Wild Man."
305.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
You get what you pay for!
306.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Arn't even the highest grades of tea only about $40 an ounce though? Or am I missing some 'Primo Stuff' somewhere?
307.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
See my comment above. I agree on many points... But also see the possibility that 'total annihilation' in a pre-21st century sense of war may not be in the cards for numerous reasons.
308.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Agreed which is why I mentioned 'total annihilation' of the enemy. But if you want to keep infrastructure or be able to exploit their resources after the war... You can't really do that. Its a decision that has to be made. Mo
309.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
So you're going with the "Everything came from the caveman's need for fire" argument it sounds like. Unarguably true if you want to reduce that far. I still don't think you can come up with a logical example of Gene
310.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Good illustration of a time when a logical argument makes no sense but pointing out the ridiculousness shines light on the point!
311.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Sometimes the ridiculousness of the opposition's argument is more compelling to the majority of people than saying "You've committed fallacy A, B, C, D, & F." Especially when the 'argument' in question actu
312.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Outmatching someone militarily doesn't necessarily forecast a short war. This is especially true if you do not have the resources or interest in total annihilation of your opposition. There are many recent examples of this to choose fr
313.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
What war was Genetics (Device: Micro Arrays, PCR Machines, etc) built off of and applicable to? Or do you count that as 'medicine'? In that case you can reduce everything all the way down to cave men battling over fire. I don&#x27
314.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Unless of course the support provided by a (Western) outsider had caused other tensions (warlords uniting or what have you), thus increasing the body count, which is one possible outcome out of many. Genocide tipping in exactly the opposite
315.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
For the nth time... "We are at war with Yemen?" How can citizens be at fault when they don't even have a representative choice in the matter? The whole "war is hell" thing is trite as all get out. As a metaphorical
316.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
A hypothetical: "The principal called. He said that you cheated on your exams." "Yeah, but I never meant for anyone to find out, so why am I in trouble?" Seems legit to me!
317.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Agreed and agreed. The only reason I chimed in is because labeling an opinion piece as 'manipulation' seems pretty suspect. That is tantamount to saying "anyone who has an opinion I disagree with is manipulating me." Art
318.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
1) It is clearly labeled as an opinion piece (First person abounds: I saw, I wish, I knew)... If you are looking for informative, unbiased, hard hitting journalism in an opinion piece you may be looking in the wrong place. 2) Decisions are
319.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
How would intervening in Rawanda have saved lives exactly? Go in and arm the Tutsi's? Start killing Hutus? It is probable that intervention would have caused more casualties (including to US forces). Kosovo is also disputed even in ter
320.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
And these were? It read much more as a practice in "no one is unbiased so this is misleading." It also tries to equate drones use against individual targets (a couple individuals generally) with large scale bombing, which is highl
321.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
No one has ever gone to prison for BS reasons, or been falsely accused. How can you ever trust anyone who ever did anything wrong in their life? If you've done something wrong you're obviously a bad person forever. <sarcasm>
322.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
Very much so. 'Prestige job' pretty much sums it up. Only a fool gets a PhD so they can 'make the big bucks'. If they were into it just for the money they'd go into finance rather than fiddling around with teaching
323.
by ItendToDisagree 13y ago
When did 400K or even "well north of 150K" become "unlimited money"? Unless you're Craig Venter (who isn't an 'academic') or some other incredible outlier there is nothing like Rockstar/Jayz weal