Isofarro

56 ms·

241.
by Isofarro 13y ago
You have an accessibility issue in your example markup. Having links adjacent to each other without either non-linked readable characters, or an appropriate markup structure leads to screen readers reading out the numbers 1 2 3 4 in a &quot
242.
by Isofarro 13y ago
" A HTML document is just text. Technically adding links, particularly navigation, is just presentation markup. " HTML is HyperText markup language. Hypertext is about links and references to other documents. Links are a first cla
243.
by Isofarro 13y ago
" Ultimately, though, the "separation of concerns" was a good principle to use when the web was a bunch of documents meant to provide content. It isn't that way anymore. The web has evolved in use to include web apps and
244.
by Isofarro 13y ago
I'm starting to see a pattern here about "presentational CSS class names": considering the superficial presentation layer and not the underlying meaning that links consistent design elements. There's a language to design
245.
by Isofarro 13y ago
This "apps rather than documents" is hokum. Each time one of these JavaScript-mandatory websites is declared a case-study in web app development best practice, decrying progressive enhancement, there's normally something unde
246.
Wysiwtfftwomg(markboulton.co.uk)
131 points by Isofarro 13y ago|85 comments
247.
by Isofarro 13y ago
Nitpick: it can also be done in JavaScript.
248.
Monitoring sucks (and what you can do about it)(devslovebacon.com)
2 points by Isofarro 13y ago|0 comments
249.
Unfashionably profitable(rachelandrew.co.uk)
1 points by Isofarro 13y ago|0 comments
250.
by Isofarro 13y ago
The lifetime costs seems quite high in comparison to the monthly cost. It works out cheaper if the VPS is still running after 3 years. Then you are getting a discount. But, in 3 years, what will the VPS market look like? VPS pricing is drop
251.
The shiny silver elephant in the room(christianheilmann.com)
1 points by Isofarro 13y ago|0 comments
252.
What is EME?(hsivonen.fi)
5 points by Isofarro 13y ago|0 comments
253.
by Isofarro 13y ago
" Wrong. 1 reply of "I'm not interested, please don't contact me again." is normal speak. " No. This is no different to spam, it is an unsolicited email for commercial gain for the sender. What you are advocati
254.
The battle to destroy Wikipedia's biggest sockpuppet army(dailydot.com)
17 points by Isofarro 13y ago|2 comments
255.
by Isofarro 13y ago
Progressive enhancement is still better than this. The noscript element is a fallback when JavaScript is not available or turned off. It doesn't handle situations where JavaScript is enabled, but your application failed to get the Java
256.
by Isofarro 13y ago
" are there any frameworks that can assist with this stitching together of content " Mainstream, no. These are not typical use-cases for sites until they reach a gigantic scale. Plus, even before you get to that level, there'
257.
by Isofarro 13y ago
Facebook's big pipe is nothing more than a client-side hack to work around a limitation of their server-side architecture. Both Yahoo and Amazon - that I personally know of - have an infrastructure where components on the page are rend
258.
by Isofarro 13y ago
Progressive enhancement. It is a web development best practice. You will find that "dynamic loading of content" doesn't automatically mean "no content served by HTML under any circumstances". This is an error perpet
259.
by Isofarro 13y ago
Considering the intention behind the Google document is to enable support for existing Ajax applications, and not the cornerstone of crawlability of newly built apps, probably not. Also, the same document that's quoted in defence of th
260.
by Isofarro 13y ago
> Some public web apps simply don't work without behaviour. Every app that uses a solution like this to generate static views of a website is an app that simply works without behaviour.
261.
by Isofarro 13y ago
Less dependencies, a reduced risk vector. Just the HTML page containing the content needs to load.
262.
by Isofarro 13y ago
That Google Ajax crawler spec is no magic bullet. Nick Denton: "Dip in uniques largely because of drop in Google refers. Pageviews (which are driven more by core audience) less affected." -- http://twitter.com/nick
263.
by Isofarro 13y ago
An entire project written to simulate progressive enhancement (badly). One that only works for specified whitelisted User-Agents, instead of being based on capability. I'm also not understanding the use-case for this project. Everytime
264.
Why technology history matters(karenmcgrane.com)
1 points by Isofarro 13y ago|0 comments
265.
Making technology work for disabled people(blog.scope.org.uk)
1 points by Isofarro 13y ago|0 comments
266.
by Isofarro 13y ago
Gawker did this a while back. And reverted after their Google rankings took a hefty plunge. That is one very large caveat, that Ajax crawler spec is no magic bullet. Nick Denton: "Dip in uniques largely because of drop in Google refers
267.
The Lords of Vendorbation(zeldman.com)
4 points by Isofarro 13y ago|0 comments
268.
by Isofarro 13y ago
"And as for Bustle not having a public JSON API, well, here you go: curl -H "Accept: application/json" http://www.bustle.com/api/v1/sections/home.json A versioned JSON API that is guarante
269.
by Isofarro 13y ago
"Bustle actually uses PhantomJS to create static versions of the site, for serving to search spiders." What value dose using PhantomJS offer above what progressive enhancement gives you for free? This feels like a contradiction. A
270.
by Isofarro 13y ago
Don't threaten to resign. Make your argument, back it up with data and evidence, let managers the space to do the job they are supposed to do. If then they don't fix the problem, then just leave. There is only downside for threate

More ›