InvertedRhodium

28 ms·

331.
by InvertedRhodium 6y ago
I don't know why everyone is so adamant that it's never going to happen, it seems an incredibly defeatist mindset to take. The best way I can think of is to make people want to speak to you and then only be available on Signal. If
332.
by InvertedRhodium 6y ago
On that note, if my family isn't willing to install another application and spend 5 minutes wrapping their head around how to use it - well, I guess I just accurately defined the value of our relationship.
333.
by InvertedRhodium 6y ago
Convenience vs Security - Pretty much any change made at the behest of convenience is at the expense of security. Honestly, once every 2 years having to move some files around...well, if that's the barrier that people aren't willi
334.
by InvertedRhodium 6y ago
Android (at least used to) has native support for SIP through their phone application. I used it quite a bit 5 years ago or so, but moved over to...well, I can't remember. A 3rd party app that gave better visibility over what was happe
335.
by InvertedRhodium 6y ago
If they take donations in order to fund it, doesn't that give you the option of paying for the service directly?
336.
by InvertedRhodium 6y ago
Well, sure. But in the context of enforcing a limit on a human - by either reporting a breach or actively preventing the car from exceeding the speed limit - and not the car driving itself, I don't see any of that being an issue.
337.
by InvertedRhodium 6y ago
If there's no sign to indicate that the speed limit is changed, how are you supposed to know what the speed limit is? I've had speeding tickets forgiven in Australia because the sign simply wasn't visible enough due to overgr