InsideOutSanta

6 ms·

91.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
If you get big, the naming no longer matters. We made jokes about the Wii until everybody had one. But if you don't get big, and most people have no idea what they're looking at when they see your product for the first time, namin
92.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
xXxSpaceXAIxX: Return of Xander Cage
93.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
An LLM so nice, they named it twice.
94.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Well, you get hundreds of billions in debt, and then you get open weight models distilling your proprietary models.
95.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Well, it falsified my intuitive guess that more unauthorized immigration might decrease crime because there are more people who risk deportation if they are caught.
96.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, too, but it seems to me that most people responding to you misunderstood your point.
97.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
I don't think training people to burn out by 35 is a good plan for anyone involved.
98.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
What if I told you that I saw you punch a baby?
99.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
The amount of money you can make with this only depends on how much money you already have.
100.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
This is like claiming that Linux isn't open because you don't have a PC. Models can be open-weight even if you don't have the hardware to run them.
101.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
> It’s a not very well kept secret in the industry I would rather say it's been a very well kept secret if it's true, which I highly doubt. It also makes absolutely no sense; so far, Anthropic has taken every opportunity th
102.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
> nobody in the corporate world is using Linux desktops This is the wrong comparison. An LLM provider isn't like a desktop OS; it's like a server OS. And everybody is using Linux for their servers. > And let me know when
103.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
> So we are just vibe patenting rubbish and rebranding it with AI? "Patenting rubbish" is a description of pretty much all software patents since forever.
104.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Yeah, same. I have the phone I actually want, and then I have the phone I need because otherwise I couldn't function in society. It's workable but sometimes unpleasant, because I don't bring two phones with me, so I just can&
105.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Fair.
106.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Anthropic has not released an official EBITDA figure.
107.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Not a single thing in my comment is false.
108.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Exactly.
109.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
It's pretty obvious from context and from the specific example what I'm talking about.
110.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
We're talking about corporations here. Of course they use Linux, and of course they'll provide their employees access to the LLMs that cost half the price and are 90% as good.
111.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
If they were profitable, they'd release real numbers and announce concrete plans for an IPO. They are very obviously not profitable; they just announced a $65B Series H two months ago. They're almost literally setting money on fir
112.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
The question is not whether LLMs have value; the question is who will earn how much money off them. I don't see any scenario where the companies that put hundreds of billions into their models make that money back.
113.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
The apps you actually need to participate in society (digital IDs, banking apps, etc.) will never run on your homegrown OS. Having a billion dollars changes nothing about the fact that you need either iOS or a Google-blessed Android versi
114.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Huawei can't sell fully functional phones anywhere outside of China, including in Europe. You need Google Mobile Services and the Google Play Store to be able to install stuff like your banking app, and the US government is preventing
115.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
People have been voting with their wallets since forever, and look where it got us. The reality is that asking people to vote with their wallets does not work. But this specific case is even worse, because it's not possible to "
116.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Yeah, I think that case is absolutely wild, because ostensibly the point of the recorded music was to showcase the strings.
117.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
> I think we should refrain extending “negative externality” to mean “things people don’t like that might affect them.” But that's pretty much the definition of the term. It's a negative impact on a third party. If I'm l
118.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
5G towers have no negative externalities except looking kinda dorky. In fact, they're nice; they improve your reception. The same cannot be said for data centers. (Instead of just downvoting this, I'd appreciate it if you could p
119.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
Something went seriously wrong there, and I'm not sure it's just Claude copying an existing project bug-for-bug. For more context, see also this post from Gruber at Daring Fireball: https://daringfireball.net/2026&
120.
by InsideOutSanta 2mo ago
We went from "obviously the doomers are wrong because who would be dumb enough to just let severely unaligned models loose on the Internet" to this. Insanity.

More ›