IncRnd

43 ms·

541.
by IncRnd 4y ago
> Every advisory of the US recognizes information war as a key strategy of their overall war, why on earth should the US gov ignore this and refuse to fight back? I think you responded to someone else's comment from elsewhere. I did
542.
by IncRnd 4y ago
The Department of Homeland Security should not be allowed to be involved with any sort of fact monitoring or information shaping in the US. I'd think this would be obvious.
543.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Before that, on vax, COM files were text files that contained commands to execute.
544.
by IncRnd 4y ago
> Feels hella pretentious and weird to set up donations. I'm not sure of your location, but in the US these are not donations but income on which taxes need to be paid.
545.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Testimony on Hair Analysis is not the same as Hair Analysis.
546.
by IncRnd 4y ago
I thought the same thing prior to reading the article.
547.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Yes. Version 5.1.16(1).
548.
by IncRnd 4y ago
There is an error with the template script on a fully patched m1 macbook. $1 is unbound, unless you provide an argument. This seems to be an utterly basic oversight for a template script from someone attempting to educate on bash's bes
549.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Previous Discussion: Everything Is an X (November 12, 2020) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25078209
550.
by IncRnd 4y ago
There are fewer bugs that hit the windshield even when on a rural interstate. There are many areas that have cars but aren't in the middle of cities or in areas with high traffic.
551.
by IncRnd 4y ago
> I think OP explains clearly, in many paragraphs, why it's fair use. That's literally what their whole post is about. Actually, what the OP said is, "is typically or commonly a fair use under existing law, because the AIs
552.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Yes, a vpn is clandestine. However, it isn't correct to say that Tor's traffic is clandestine (which it is), but using it isn't clandestine. Hiding your traffic's contents is the same as hiding your traffic's conten
553.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Thank you for that, though it seems you replied to the wrong comment. That doesn't have to do with what I wrote.
554.
by IncRnd 4y ago
So, you'd also lie to Congress, because you wouldn't expect to get caught. Got it.
555.
by IncRnd 4y ago
> Facebook etc already pays large amounts for their moderation army: https://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/ (unclear if the OP knew this or was ignoring it for some reason). The article you link
556.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Yes, but I was pointing that out to my parent poster, who erronesouly said the code was GPL licensed.
557.
by IncRnd 4y ago
The license for other code, even when in the same repo, doesn't apply to the license on the code that is under discussion here.
558.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Slow down there with the snarky comments. I never said GPL'd code doesn't have a copyright owner.
559.
by IncRnd 4y ago
> There is absolutely zero doubt in my mind that copilot et al will lead to the absolute proliferation of half baked code even more than all the other mundane ways to copy&paste do. Agreed. That was my point.
560.
by IncRnd 4y ago
In most newspapers there has been a section for letters to the editor. Those sections are moderated by editors. That is the reference, not some situation of random readers somehow publishing material, by posing as journalists on the newspap
561.
by IncRnd 4y ago
In other words, you'd lie to Congress. Being glib is not the same as being truthful.
562.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Other than the legality of this code being copied almost verbatim - who is the person who would use it? A person who would use it could also write it. If they cannot write it, why would they ever use this very specific code that magically a
563.
by IncRnd 4y ago
The code is not GPL but is copyrighted in his name.
564.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Tor's traffic is clandestine.
565.
by IncRnd 4y ago
That's the thing. You might just end up with Big Blue coming after you.
566.
by IncRnd 4y ago
I'll treat that as an idle question on the technical aspects, not a question about how to evade law enforcement. There are people on this page talking about logging into other services from there, so I think you can see one very easy w
567.
by IncRnd 4y ago
The other part is that you may be liable for how others use these boxes, just by your logging into one. It's not only whether you use one at work.
568.
by IncRnd 4y ago
From the article: Is it safe? Nobody ever got arrested for choosing segfault.net. Take a close look at how that question isn't answered. It's best not to do any work on these, where you need to trust the platform. You mig
569.
by IncRnd 4y ago
This seems as it was a fun project. I'd caution people not to take it as a "better" way to generate cryptographically secure random numbers. It's just a method that is used, which is good enough for lots of instances tha
570.
by IncRnd 4y ago
Yes. There also seems to be a disconnect from this article and the press release it links. While they both contain the words, "Universal Basic Income," this UBI seems time-bound and purpose driven like an old-fashioned grant that

More ›