Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
IncRnd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
46 ms
·
421.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
That doesn't come close to addressing the problems stated in the article.
422.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
It's not a sensical statement but is akin to saying that the fundamental properties of the Universe are Fire, Water, Earth, and Air. It's clearly a wrong statement to say that "Consciousness is an emergent property of your wh
423.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
From this article, "This rancher, who wants to remain anonymous, sees trucks driving around in his pastures, sometimes well after dusk. Every rifle season, a fleet of trucks is parked on his private driveway. He’s witnessed people shoo
424.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Trespass to land involves the "unjustifiable interference with land which is in the immediate and exclusive possession of another"; it is both a tort and, in certain circumstances, a crime under the Criminal Justice a
425.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
How was your parent poster rude? The poster seemed simply to be stating a fact.
426.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
And, then there are another 3999 pages in the bill. There aren't enough hours in the day to read all of these 4k-10k page bills to learn what they really say.
427.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Programmers ask the AI how to fix itself, when it has a bug.
428.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
I copy-pasted your comment into my team's chatroom, but now Slack isn't responding for anyone.
429.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
> I think you mean flammable. Inflammable and flammable are both adjectives that mean "easily set on fire". They have slightly different etymologies. In the case of inflammable, in- means "into" and is not a negation.
430.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
It's not exactly for that reason. The insurance companies don't want to be liable for a future similar incident, so they are pushing future liability onto hotels that don't do a million things to guard against the last incide
431.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Pre 9/11 to now for air travel is the difference between day and night. It's not even close. This pretend, fake security we have today imposes so many burdens and costs on people who wish to travel. The least suspicious would easi
432.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
I gave you the overarching theory and one specific method in my comment to which you replied. PS The shared secrets I mentioned were not in that context symmetric keys but split keys. A tool will never solve a security problem by creating a
433.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
It's not that complex, and many products and approaches handle this properly. Keep the key out of band with the secrets. Never keep the secrets in an unencrypted form. Keying material can be composed of or accessed by what you know, wh
434.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
I'm pretty sure it was a fair reading, for people who read the article. The article discussed the option of throwing 40 years of development out the window or borrowing/imitating things from emacs/vim. Then the MS Word commen
435.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Thank you. I wasn't asking whether the product could do that through integrations but whether it operates insecurely by default.
436.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Do I understand correctly that if I place secrets into the store that those secrets will be synced to environment variables across machines?
437.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
HN Title: Infisical – open-source secrets manager Github text: Infisical is an open-source, end-to-end encrypted tool to sync environment variables across your team and infrastructure. Which does it do? Does it manage sec
438.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
> (I'm guessing the author means VS Code, not MS Word here?) I took that to mean that the author painted all non-emacs editors as not really being useful editors.
439.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Proterra, an EV maker is down 51% YTD. Lucid, an EV maker, is down 52% in the last 6M and 82% YTD. GM is down 41% YTD. Stocks are funny that way.
440.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
That seems like something that happens with ad-hoc customers not so much with enterprise customers who have purchased support plans (for this reason among others).
441.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
> The point of the announcement is to give a timeline to start treating SHA1 as having no real security. That's also false. There is a large body of knowledge here that you aren't expressing in your comments. That leads me to s
442.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Ah. Thanks for the explanation.
443.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
> CRC is now more valid use case than SHA1. That's the point of this announcement. No. That isn't the point of this announcement. This announcement codifies a transition time for SHA-1 use in SBU and has nothing to do with a CR
444.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
> I feel like the properties of CRC make them superior for that task in most cases though. THIS IS FALSE. Please do not ever do this. Why not? For example, by controlling any four contiguous bytes in a file, the resultant 32bit CRC can b
445.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Here is Bill Gate's Press Release for 2022. "With the support and guidance of our board, we plan to increase our spending from nearly $6 billion per year today to $9 billion per year by 2026. To help make this spending increase po
446.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Someone probably told them that money is fungible.
447.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Except "great fortunes" isn't what gp wrote. GP wrote, "great real or perceived fortunes". Besides, how do you know what fortunes people have made with their liquor stores or consulting companies? Ross Perot was a b
448.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
> He very likely knows more about the law than anyone on here. How could he not? The answer is simple, through a lack of knowledge. Knowledge of the law is not genetically inherited.
449.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
There are so many people who have obtained fortunes and not become drunk on that. The person who built a liquor store and grew into 20 stores across the city. People who started consulting companies. That immigrant family who scraped and sc
450.
▲
by
IncRnd
4y ago
Don't be obtuse. Using crypto for payments isn't common. Maybe you can make 1 on 1 payments to other people who are also convinced to use the same crypto as you. People who don't use that crypto (almost everyone in the world)
More ›