Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ImprobableTruth
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
601.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
Is there anything to indicate that excessive screen usage can cause blindness? Especially since LCD aren't that bad concerning eye strain.
602.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
Are you sure? I thought they were just demonetizing them (which is still bad, but less bad)
603.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
How would doing it in second life be a more lasting contribution than in minecraft? At least with minecraft people can always host their own servers using the world, while if second life shuts down, everything is gone for good. And why is t
604.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
I'm in the process of getting my master's degree, but so far it just feels incremental to the bachelor's. Does the thesis make a huge difference?
605.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
What would you do to get a good idea? I have an area I'm really interested in, but it just seems like any ideas I have could have the potential to be a dud. Coming up with an idea that you'd be willing to commit several years to j
606.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
It's not about working hard , but about accepting that it's okay to feel challenged by work. Reducing the amount of work is, of course, great, but unless you completely automate your job it's never going to be always easy.
607.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
There may be a financial incentive for hospitals, but hospitals don't mark these deaths, doctors do. I think it at the very least borders on a conspiracy theory to suggest that doctors are making a coordinated effort to falsely label d
608.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
The NYT[0] has some neat graphs, but it's not a primary source. EuroMOMO[1] is a source for Europe, but I don't know what the equivalent would be for the US. [0] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/0
609.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
Well, you could also use ZBrush for rigging. I think that multi res in Blender can work with up to 10 million polys (or maybe this is a work in progress?), but don't quote me on that. I don't see why you wouldn't just go for
610.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
High quality models are created via sculpting (5-10 million is actually still on the low end for that) before being retopologized. For anything high-fidelty (that is, anything you might encounter in a non-hobbyist project) it's _more_
611.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
>A language which said nothing and did nothing would be in the lower left too. Huh? This is like if I were to argue that I'm one of the top runners in the world since I can't finish a marathon and thus my finish time is 0. A la
612.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
Unless you're using some non-standard definition of evaluation, this is not true when using a lazy strategy. Consider the term ((const c) x) for g x which reduces to c without ever evaluating x.
613.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
6y ago
Really? I've had the inverse problem where it only corrects anything once I've hit safe.
614.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
7y ago
I think it's absolutely crazy and irresponsible to do a press conference on a paper that you haven't even released a preprint of. I really hope that there aren't any issues with the actual publication, because if there are, t
615.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
7y ago
The key idea is that there are functional data structures that only require you to copy a small part and reuse a lot of the old. For example, if you have a binary tree and you want to swap out the root value, you create a new root node that
616.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
7y ago
I wouldn't say they are a seperate language, but they definitely feel like a seperate layer. They're not first class objects like functions (so you can't pass them to functions) and you can't evaluate the arguments (sinc
617.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
7y ago
Macros are fully expanded before the rest of the code is executed. Trying to argue that Lisp doesn't have a distinction between compile time and run time because you usually have the compiler (or at least interpreter) available at runt
618.
▲
by
ImprobableTruth
7y ago
Rice's theorem only aplies to turing complete programs, so if youre "weak enough" there's no problem being both sound and complete. I think it's easy to see why people would think of such systems as "nicer"