ImJamal

44 ms·

811.
by ImJamal 3y ago
[flagged]
812.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Nobody is saying it is acceptable. The problem is every time the Church is brought up somebody has to talk about the abuse/cover up regardless of the topic. It is completely irrelevant to this thread. Nobody does this with public schoo
813.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Are you seriously suggesting that abortion wasn't talked about heavily 20 years ago? You don't remember Clinton pushing against people opposed to abortion saying he wanted them to be safe, legal and rare?
814.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Hopefully we can finally put all this racism and sexism behind us once and for all.
815.
by ImJamal 3y ago
They specifically don't have this authority according to section 5...
816.
by ImJamal 3y ago
It says "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." What law did Congress (federal not state legislatures) pass to allow states to enforce this? Oh that is right, none.
817.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Apparently historians only read the first 3 sections of the 14th amendment and failed to get to the 5th which explicitly states that the execution is left to the federal government not the states.
818.
by ImJamal 3y ago
They do have a motivation since Apple requires apps to list data collection/privacy related things.
819.
by ImJamal 3y ago
You can try to help people change their mind. Daryl Davis is a black man who got quite a few people to leave the KKK by talking to them and showing his humanity. The idea you can't help people along is ridiculous.
820.
by ImJamal 3y ago
That last quote is kinda weird >Unfortunately, you can’t turn a Nazi into not a Nazi. But we can limit the impact of the Nazis Do they really think somebody cannot have a change of heart. If you accept Nazism once then you can never stop
821.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Is this only a problem if you are doing some sort of network boot or do boot loaders connect to a network for another reason?
822.
by ImJamal 3y ago
California could implement both of them without the federal government if they wanted.
823.
by ImJamal 3y ago
The CCP blackmails Chinese in other countries so it matters for them.
824.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Do you think 85 years ago when the British and French were anti-German that they were being racist? Or perhaps they just didn't like people from a certain nation?
825.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Believe it or not, but the Chinese government could grant a patent that had technology stolen / copied from other countries. Also, Chinese isn't a race so it isn't racist. It is anti-China / nationalist at worst.
826.
by ImJamal 3y ago
What does that have to do with outsourcing to China and others?
827.
British Library begins restoring digital services after cyber-attack(theguardian.com)
1 points by ImJamal 3y ago|0 comments
828.
by ImJamal 3y ago
The Wikipedia page doesn't have a date for that, but it says this was invented in 2006. If that is when it occurred, do you think it couldn't have improved in 20 years? Regardless, this was likely a random person who created it, n
829.
by ImJamal 3y ago
I'm a little confused what you mean by this not affecting Russian profits. If India buys oil from Russia that they don't need so they can resell it to the EU then Russia is making more money then they would have. It is not like In
830.
by ImJamal 3y ago
It seems like there is a better argument. The 10th amendment basically says if it is not given to the federal government and not banned by the Constitution it is left to the states. Labor rules are not mentioned in the Constitution so a pla
831.
by ImJamal 3y ago
How would a blind trust prevent somebody staying in a Trump hotel from calling Trump from the hotel phone? How would it prevent them from doing a video call so Trump can see they are in a Trump hotel? If a Trump hotel was sold by the blind
832.
by ImJamal 3y ago
I made a reply to another person that I think is fitting "I don't think you understand what putting businesses in a blind trust would do. If somebody went to one of Trump's hotels it is not like he wouldn't be capable of
833.
by ImJamal 3y ago
>That is what a blind trust is, by definition. If the person has any knowledge then it is not in a blind trust. Did you not read my example where Trump could get the knowledge without having any access to the business records? A blind tr
834.
by ImJamal 3y ago
>This wasn't a concern for most presidents because no one has ever lost a presidential election after his first term and then won a subsequent election. Not true. This happened with Grover Cleveland. >Presidents typically serve a
835.
by ImJamal 3y ago
I don't think you understand what putting businesses in a blind trust would do. If somebody went to one of Trump's hotels it is not like he wouldn't be capable of knowing they went there. The person at the hotel could literal
836.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Trump would still have received the money even if the businesses were in a blind trust though?
837.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Surely this is an expansion of the previous administration forcing $35 insulin? https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/president-trump-...
838.
by ImJamal 3y ago
I think it is about forcing people to live by their own rules. If you believe hate speech is not free speech then according to your own rules you should be punished if you say or protect hate speech.
839.
by ImJamal 3y ago
As far as I know most of the laws don't provide an exception if you look old enough.
840.
Fedora Optimized Binaries for the AMD64 Architecture(fedoraproject.org)
27 points by ImJamal 3y ago|2 comments

More ›