IceDane

6 ms·

31.
by IceDane 3mo ago
Slowly but surely dynamic programming proponents discover the value of statically verifiable correctness. Who'd have thought?
32.
by IceDane 3mo ago
Martine just straight up sucks. Vendoring your components gives you the best of both worlds. You get a full component library but retain the ability to modify them as you want. Your AI agent claim doesn't make any sense either. When up
33.
by IceDane 3mo ago
But Kubernetes isn't postgres or ruby or containers. It's the orchestration service. Your comparison doesn't make sense.
34.
by IceDane 3mo ago
This example is not only wrong for what you intend to demonstrate but even if it wasn't, it's not problematic. In typescript the proper way to do this is using branded types and exporting only the safe constructor, making anyone w
35.
by IceDane 3mo ago
If the goal is to convince me not to use this: mission accomplished. This looks awful on mobile.
36.
by IceDane 3mo ago
The examples for the M5 exploit and the other stuff immediately make me think that the author is an idiot. I'm not calling you an idiot - I'm saying that if I were to read a technical article and the first thing I'm presented
37.
by IceDane 3mo ago
Nobody in Denmark actually thinks of Lars Andersen as any sort of serious privacy activist. He is a drug-addled moron who just happens to dabble in those things. He's an idiot and contributes nothing of value to society.
38.
by IceDane 3mo ago
Like the sibling said: CORS is the relaxation of default security features. It's even in the name: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing.
39.
by IceDane 4mo ago
> According to my rough computation (N=1), a Claude Max 20x at $200 gives you access to around $8k According to my own personal `cc-usage` script, I'm just about to hit $15k in the past 30 days, and that's about half 5x and hal
40.
by IceDane 4mo ago
> I don't see an asymmetry in the abstraction. Both vectors and maps are associative structures - you can assign a key to a value - the only difference is that vectors have a more constrained keyspace (i.e. ordered, consecutive inte
41.
by IceDane 4mo ago
It's not about "knowing" anything. It's about admitting that humans are fallible meat computers that can't hold invariants in their head across thousands or millions of lines of code and possibly an exponential numb
42.
by IceDane 4mo ago
The problem with your counter-argument is that it hinges on a false premise: That you need or even want a function like `assoc` which is polymorphic over everything . It's an extremely overloaded function which does a lot of things at
43.
by IceDane 4mo ago
"Until you get better" is such an arrogant take. It's not just about skill. It's about maintainability, ease of refactor, and modeling invariants in your code in a way that they can be checked by the machine (the compile
44.
by IceDane 4mo ago
Effect is unreasonably effective. Pun etc. The problem with these concepts is a) they are completely opaque to the common chud programmer and b) they are just not available to people in languages that anyone actually uses. There are a bunch
45.
by IceDane 4mo ago
Is this really a position you want to take in public with your real name and identity and everything plastered over your profile?
46.
by IceDane 4mo ago
No.. that's not the only reason. Global state is bad because it makes it hard to reason about your system. The global state can affect any part of it, or, focusing on the inverse which is probably better applied to global styles, any p
47.
by IceDane 5mo ago
This doesn't make any sense to me. The problem with this dev's approach is not AI, it's their use of it. They didn't ensure that the architecture made sense. They didn't look at the code and get a "feel" f
48.
by IceDane 5mo ago
Runs smoothly for me in Zen (FF) on Linux.
49.
by IceDane 5mo ago
As much as I also enjoyed the actual coding part, a lot of it is just .. boring plumbing. I enjoy solving the problems - designing the solutions, the algorithms, choosing the right tech, coming up with nice abstractions. When doing agentic
50.
by IceDane 5mo ago
Only incredibly inexperienced people think indentation in python is a problem.
51.
by IceDane 5mo ago
It's like horoscopes for the entirely-too-AI-pilled. Founded in nothing but vibes. "Don't write prompts like that, do it like this! I swear it's better. Claude says so!"
52.
by IceDane 5mo ago
Have you just completely retired your brain in favor of a bidirectional pipe to an LLM?
53.
by IceDane 5mo ago
It's awful, and seeing even engineers I respected become so AI pilled they're shipping slop without review has made me lose respect for them. It also can't help but make me wonder: what am I missing? Am I holding it wrong? Am
54.
by IceDane 5mo ago
How about reading the article?
55.
by IceDane 5mo ago
It's staggering to me how many times I've heard this argument that LLMs are just the next level of abstraction. Some people are even comparing them to compilers.
56.
by IceDane 5mo ago
Outsource manual labor, not your brain.
57.
by IceDane 5mo ago
This person is a card-carrying moron and has no idea how anything works. Even if we concede that maybe there should be some grace period or soft deletions or whatever.. Also, the post is 100% written by an LLM, which is ironic enough on its
58.
by IceDane 5mo ago
This is the stupidest thing I've read for months, which is wild with the Trump admin and all the AI hype. Not only do they blame all of this on a stupid tool, but they also clearly couldn't even write this themselves. This is so o
59.
by IceDane 6mo ago
This is the worst form of Article I've ever seen. Did the author read this? Is there even really an author or did Chatgpt just write all of it and generate the page?
60.
by IceDane 6mo ago
Okay, so this is just a text prompt that could have been actual UI elements where I select dimensions, fed to an LLM in the poorest way possible so it doesn't even work properly, where you ask it to kinda sorta solve a binpacking probl

More ›