HybridStatAnim8

9 ms·

91.
by HybridStatAnim8 4mo ago
Yes. GrapheneOS maintains 99% app compatibility, and the 1% that is lacking is due to apps using incredibly misguided and nonsensical "antiabuse" mechanisms. GrapheneOS is often better for testing apps due to it being trivial to t
92.
by HybridStatAnim8 4mo ago
From what I recall, you need to enable exploit protection compatibility mode for that app, and it should work just fine.
93.
by HybridStatAnim8 5mo ago
GrapheneOS is more simple and vanilla than CalyxOS. GrapheneOS puts substantial effort into seamless/passive privacy and security features, as well as maintaining feature parity with the Android Open Source Project and with Googles sto
94.
by HybridStatAnim8 5mo ago
GrapheneOS inherits the user interface of the Android Open Source Project, which is what Pixels stock operating system uses, along with many other OEM forks of android. GrapheneOSs App Store is present to fulfil the role of the first party
95.
by HybridStatAnim8 5mo ago
No, GrapheneOS adheres to the same support period that the OEM provides. End of life devices are insecure and should not be used. Only the OEM can provide the firmware updates necessary for proper support, because the firmware images are si
96.
by HybridStatAnim8 5mo ago
An 8 series device or higher is recommended. Getting new from non-carrier stores or google store is reliable. Used is a gamble due to improper OEM unlocking practices, so make sure it has a good return policy and try to verify OEM unlocking
97.
by HybridStatAnim8 5mo ago
OEM/carrier locking tends to only happen in the US. Many carriers permit unlocking after the contract has concluded, but Verizon has always blocked it. Used devices also run the risk of being improperly unlocked and making OEM unlockin
98.
by HybridStatAnim8 5mo ago
OEM/carrier locking tends to only happen in the US. Many carriers permit unlocking after the contract has concluded, but Verizon has always blocked it. Used devices also run the risk of being improperly unlocked and making OEM unlockin
99.
by HybridStatAnim8 5mo ago
Motorola devices with GrapheneOS support will arrive in 2027 or later, not 2026. Likely, the 2027 Signature, Razr fold, and Razr flip, will meet GOSs hardware security requirements.
100.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
I would not use those words to describe the approach they take. They make the effort to speak neutrally and objectively, but the issues they are making light of are often exactly as extreme and common as they describe. Many people have voic
101.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
People can accidentally be spreading attacks with loaded/presumptuous statements even when their intentions are pure. Unfortunately, pure intentions can still cause harm that needs to be countered. Take your reply as an example, the Gr
102.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
I must emphasise I am not associated with GrapheneOS.
103.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
I am a GrapheneOS user and community member, and I am active in the chat rooms. I made this account to assist with misinformation. As for how such a thing would not be possible; -GrapheneOS updates do not trust the network, so any compromis
104.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
I have been a GrapheneOS user for several years, and I choose to dedicate my time supporting the project. Supporting an open source project is not 'astroturfing'. I am an active chatroom member, and many people see me there on a r
105.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
I gathered you were being facetious, but I do not appreciate being called a sockpuppet. I am a GOS community member and I have been for several years. I am active in the GrapheneOS chatrooms, and I choose to volunteer my time assisting othe
106.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
Rossmann made a thread on Kiwi Farms because Kiwi Farms members support him, and they support harassing his targets. Rossmann has an account on Kiwi Farms for the purpose of engaging with his supporters on the site. He acts friendly with th
107.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
At the time of writing, I scrolled 4 posts down and found one. GrapheneOS are security researchers, so they often are a first party source. As for the attacks, they have plenty of evidence for their claims. They avoid giving any attacks mor
108.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
Their entire post regarding pinephones is accurate. Hardware kill switches need to be correctly implemented. A kill switch cutting off mics and not sensors or speakers is incomplete and privacy theater. Not to mention kill switches assume t
109.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
GrapheneOS wants to post more positive things, rather than just defensive replies. But they have very little choice in the matter. If the inhumane levels of attacks werent happening, they would have more time to discuss future features, how
110.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
Its not broad criticism, its attacks that use criticism as a false excuse. Defending themselves neutrally and objectively is not unhinged.
111.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
None of this is accurate. Community backlash was not what forced them to step down. The attacks, including attempted murder, was what led them to handing the lead developer position to another trusted project member. Attacks against GOS hav
112.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
Micay was distressed due to ongoing circumstances. Rossmann choice to publicly blast what was supposed to be a private discussion, lied to his own viewers, twisted what was happening, etc. Also note Rossmann has an identity verified kiwifar
113.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
GrapheneOS has plenty of evidence and they post it alongside their claims. They post it carefully though, and are willing to provide it to people upon request.
114.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
What they said here is accurate, not sure what youre trying to show?
115.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
GrapheneOS has never concealed this information, it has been publicly accessible on the GrapheneOS website for years, as an article describing the projects history. https://grapheneos.org/history/ Deleting signing keys
116.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
GrapheneOS is open to criticism about their project. The issue is criticism is often used as an excuse to conceal attacks.
117.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
GrapheneOS does not consider those who attack them as allies.
118.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
GrapheneOS needs to defend themselves. There would be more time for other types of posts other than defensive ones if they did not have to defend themselves.
119.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
They dont have any history of attacking others. They have a history of defending themselves from attacks. Other organizations having the resources to continue despite the damage does not mean GrapheneOS can or should deal with the damage it
120.
by HybridStatAnim8 6mo ago
The claim anyone on the GrapheneOS team is paranoid is unsubstantiated.

More ›