Herz

10 ms·

31.
by Herz 2y ago
> What are "unstable electricity bills" ? https://www.epexspot.com/en/market-data?market_area=DE-LU&au... Today Germany a peak of 2300€/MWh at 6-7, and a negative of -0.05€ at 12-13. > Changing
32.
by Herz 2y ago
Anyway. I do not intend to continue the discussion. Goodbye.
33.
by Herz 2y ago
> No. I was arguing about it being adequate. A decision is always opinion-based. Science explains how the universe works, it explains but does not deliver decisions. During the accident experts described its worst potentiel effects and t
34.
by Herz 2y ago
They are not "pointless" by definition, as every new regulation increases safety, costs, and time. They do have an impact (for better or worse). haha That said, it's wrong to start from the assumption that because they exist,
35.
by Herz 2y ago
You mention Germany, not me. Don't add random topics if you are not able to discuss the topic you've chosen. Industries are leaving Germany because of the electricity bills you tried to defend. Nearby countries don't want to
36.
by Herz 2y ago
Guess why Germany is in recession? https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wirtschaft/bessere-standortfakto... https://www.rechargenews.com/energy-transition/sweden-reject...
37.
by Herz 2y ago
> This is utterly absurd. This conclusion was reached way too late, the report states (same page) that in order to produce this conclusion the experts "finished their work in three days". In your opinion during a major nuclear
38.
by Herz 2y ago
> In 2012, ex-prime minister Naoto Kan was interviewed about the Fukushima nuclear disaster and mentioned that Japan faced a situation where there was a chance that people might not be able to live in the capital zone, including Tokyo, a
39.
by Herz 2y ago
> "In contrast to this, the subsequent decisions on 10km and 20km radii evacuation zones were not made on the basis of such knowledge. The 10km radius evacuation zone was decided solely for the reason that if venting was not impleme
40.
by Herz 2y ago
In what way do you think Fukushima is a disaster? Reports often associate the Fukushima disaster with 0 or 1 deaths, which is an exceptionally low number that many would prefer in any "disaster." As for the environmental impact, y
41.
by Herz 2y ago
This is not to say that prices will continue to decrease indefinitely; in fact, they appear to be reaching a plateau. https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/fig1battery.pn... Moreover, it is prudent to
42.
by Herz 2y ago
Many issues surrounding nuclear power are tied to regulatory hurdles and insufficient construction, resulting in numerous inefficiencies. Streamlining regulatory processes and encouraging investment is crucial for establishing a competitive
43.
by Herz 2y ago
Well, 216 GW of solar is in no way comparable to 20GW of nuclear. Capacity factor much higher, much more reliable + no storage needed. What's more, Chinese nuclear power is sometimes also used to heat homes. https://www.glob
44.
by Herz 2y ago
Attributing deaths to nuclear power due to political choices makes no sense. These fatalities were completely unjustified and driven by baseless fears. Besides, what is the point of counting deaths? In Germany, an estimated 1,100 deaths per
45.
by Herz 2y ago
Well, France is the only one in a position to say that it doesn't want the panels for aesthetic reasons. They decarbonized...
46.
by Herz 2y ago
The words of a human shouldn't necessarily represent reality, especially when the human in question is a politician and not a scientist. Your argument doesn't make much sense. Furthermore, no one could have predicted the mass prot
47.
by Herz 2y ago
https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/fig1battery.pn... Sorry but where do you see this 80% drop? When the price of storage seems close to reaching a plateau (which by the way is also what I assumed i
48.
by Herz 2y ago
I quite believe in it with the fact that it is feasible in the coming decades a way to redistirbute peak energy through daily storage. The problems in my opinion is assuming too much that everything will go as planned according to current t
49.
by Herz 2y ago
I believe you are mostly right. However, I don't think the decline in battery prices is primarily due to the technologies used. Instead, it's more about economies of scale and demand, which help optimize prices. From my perspectiv
50.
by Herz 2y ago
Do you have any idea how long it takes for a technology at a research stage to enter scale production and be commercially viable?
51.
by Herz 2y ago
> It's been true for 50 years, assuming it will be true for another decade or two is not wishful thinking. Well it's one thing though to use the storage for a cell phones and some cars, another to keep all the industries and ho
52.
by Herz 2y ago
Isn't it a bit whishful thinking to think that storage will come down in price and nuclear won't? Beyond that, leaving out storage costs, what are the technologies that can cover the world's storage? And in what quantities? B
53.
by Herz 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_Macfarlane I would like to point out that the author of this article has practically based her entire life on being anti-nuclear... I'm not saying the article is worthless, bu
54.
by Herz 2y ago
Reading what you wrote makes me feel a bit sympathetic. I can clearly see your illogical and blind fear in your reasoning. You don't care about renewable energy, despite all the data confirming that it has significant flaws as a techno
55.
by Herz 2y ago
> Ever looked at uranium mining and nuclear fuel production? 90 percent of solar panel production is in Chinese hands, between slavery in Xinjiang and environmental impacts of rare earth mining. https://www.sciencedirect.com&#
56.
by Herz 2y ago
I reinvite you to re-read the discussion. You are the one who started making completely unnecessary and inappropriate comments about my personal profile, and how I spend my time. Besides all that, with every comment I have always been in th
57.
by Herz 2y ago
I'm still trying to understand why EDF is considered problematic despite its ability to provide affordable and clean electricity nationwide. EDF outperforms other major European countries in this regard. While I support free competitio
58.
by Herz 2y ago
First of all, your arguments may be as valid as you like, but your insults and personal attacks, as far as I'm concerned, nullify your reasoning entirely. You can criticize my positions all you want, but I've never attacked you pe
59.
by Herz 2y ago
I am sorry that your frustration is so great that you have to insult and make unnecessary comments. I do not intend to continue the discussion any further. Bye.
60.
by Herz 2y ago
Cherry-picking and pseudo-Marxist rhetoric. I understand where you're coming from, but I'm not interested in entertaining your moralistic arguments. Your position is very transparent; it’s a celebration of ideologies that prefer &

More ›