Herval_freire

12 ms·

91.
by Herval_freire 4y ago
I think there just isn't enough mathematical data. English language data is magnitudes more and longer then mathematical data so there is a correlation here. The more data the better the LLM can formulate a realistic model. If it has l
92.
by Herval_freire 4y ago
Gotta look at the actual numbers for jobs in photography. These numbers say a lot more then a "few" data points.
93.
by Herval_freire 4y ago
No there is reasoning in LLMs. This is actually proven through several scientific papers. I can't say whether it's using reasoning for specific answers. I'm sure many times it just regurgitates something that is known... But
94.
by Herval_freire 4y ago
Unlikely. GPT-4 wasn't as game changing as chatGPT. People are less hyped up and have a more realistic expectation of what they should see out of an LLM. The extreme positive reaction to gpt4 is imo not driven by hype fuel. In fact, if
95.
by Herval_freire 4y ago
You're just using the tacked on features as syntactic sugar. You haven't "bought in" at all. I was traditionally trained like you under OOP and procedural methodologies. After encounter FP I fully bought in and developed
96.
by Herval_freire 4y ago
You're a good manager. But not everyone/company is like this.
97.
by Herval_freire 4y ago
The evolution of comments here on HN are telling. 1 month ago people were saying there was no way AI could do their job and many were telling everyone to calm down as nothing would happen. Now one month later this entire thread is about how
98.
by Herval_freire 4y ago
>To use a relatively modern analogy, AI-enhanced development is to developers what Photoshop is to photographers. Photography as a job has been hit heavily by modern smart phone advances. Heavily. It's now very hard to get paid a li