HereIGoAgain

10 ms·

91.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
A just over 50% approval rating, in a vote largely based along political party lines, does not a vast majority of opposition make. What I find most interesting is that among younger generations, the approval goes past 65%. Though that might
92.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Nobody should. Beyond the server levels, ability to pay should be the only thing restricting service.. full stop!
93.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Look up cellular scaffolding and how much is actually dependent on it. It makes stuff like this all the more clearer.
94.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Well said actually... mostly.
95.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Laughs in German! Seriously though. Maybe, if we solve the large capacity storage issues and are able to build a storage system to scale. So 3 or 4 decades if we are extremely lucky. But right now in reality.... And it's still not clea
96.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
And cover half the land with panels and hope to god a hail storm or anything volcanic happens. Also learn to read in the dark for night times.
97.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
On a lower end medium time scale maybe.. but the kind of power we're talking about here and needed by society, is still a few discoveries and a few decades away from actually being, let alone being practical on a large scale. And the w
98.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
That's assuming a lot I think. Having the ability to create a large amount of power on demand is a lot more useful than it's popular to think these days.
99.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
But how much is it when the winds not blowing,... or blowing too hard?
100.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Even if you choose to ignore all that has come from it.. Space is quite possibly the most important thing we can be investing time, money and research into in terms of future advancement and sustainability of the human race.
101.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
No, it's just saying they we haven't really done the serious work and engineering yet required to have an answer for this yet. Remember, we still aren't even sure which type of reactor design will work/be used. These are
102.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
How so?
103.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
.....riiight.
104.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Translation: Apple doesn't believe in the freedom to get for free, what they could restrict and charge you for themselves.
105.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
This reads like one of those "we need something...anything, to hand-wring about" kind of articles.
106.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
How about no and get back to improving AI. To hell with this online everything obsession. That OC putting aside the sheer absurdity of the idea to begin with!
107.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
The mess that just keeps on messing.
108.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Awesome!............... -_-
109.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
As for the falling sub numbers and such... I have a suggestion. Start making, buying or financing shows and movies that actual viewers (as in real people who use your service) want to watch, their sensibilities included, and stop making suc
110.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
"Glorious streaming future!" Just wait until some network nits get it trough their heads to try and improve their image, protect their brand or some stupidity and suddenly the R rated versions of movies new and old go poof out of
111.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
This is what is so scary about the hysterical fictional narrative misinforming so many. people generally don't have the first clue about the stakes and what really happened. They weren't being hosted by CF, they were getting prote
112.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Not really. Those rules are and have been enforced quite strictly. In order to show intent you're going to have to do a lot better than just saying they posted it so it's their fault. And again, we are mostly talking about public
113.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Well that kind of is important if you want to force it offline legally!
114.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
There are exceptions but the point still mostly stands. Secondly, "with intent" the rules of the site explicitly forbid harassing or interacting so that's going to be quite a claim, even in those rare exceptions, to make let
115.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
My feelings are irrelevant to my arguing. No, or at least not unless there was a good reason... More importantly, doxxing isn't illegal and is done by major media and orgs. Not to mention it seems like ~95% of what is being called dox
116.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Doxxing is not illegal, if posting publicly available info can even be called that. The only suicide that was actually blamed on the site by the victim, is someone nobody can show any official or direct evidence of's death. The second
117.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Really great points and perspective, and a good read.
118.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
Who's lives and what deaths? Most of the (3) people claimed to have died, didn't claim anything of the sort. (in fact the one that activists like to bring up most, who is actually dead, literally blamed the mental health system an
119.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
I don't understand the point of your example because that isn't what is happening here. Harassing is against the rules and will get you banned.
120.
by HereIGoAgain 4y ago
There is no process to be had here though. Harassing is and always was against the site rules (as is interacting at all really) and "doxxing" (let alone post publicly available info) isn't illegal.

More ›