Hedepig

8 ms·

31.
by Hedepig 3y ago
I think we're very used to encountering projects that have a level of polish or completeness. It's jarring when we come across amateur (for the love of) projects and homepages that lack such. For the record, I agree, I found I wan
32.
by Hedepig 3y ago
Also in its defence: it costs nothing. Feedback and critisism can be great, but why be hostile towards projects where a person has used their time to build something and release it gratis.
33.
by Hedepig 3y ago
> LLMs always talk in the same confident tone,... They do, but they are better at verifying what they've already said. So a simple prompt asking them to verify the facts they've presented often improves the accuracy. There are
34.
by Hedepig 3y ago
The recent additions OpenAI have made allows for tighter control over the outputs. I think that is a very useful step forward.
35.
by Hedepig 3y ago
I have managed to get doom emacs working on termux. I presume the same is possible with vim.
36.
by Hedepig 3y ago
Somewhat tangimential, are there any open source attempts to compete with OpenAI's embeddings? I know Word2Vec is a thing but I believe that is on a word by word basis, and doesn't capture the semantic meaning of whole sentences a
37.
by Hedepig 3y ago
While this technology is becoming mainstream, those of us that are okay with it should understand there is something fundamentally "icky" for some people. Which is difficult to debate rationally. This is partly the fault of Sci-fi
38.
by Hedepig 3y ago
With the right equipment, if not now, soon you will be able to.
39.
by Hedepig 3y ago
Maybe, but really we don't know what the shape of the curve until we actually find the limit. I think you're right, but history has plenty of technological dead-ends, particularly in the AI/ML world
40.
Ask HN: Crowdsourced Open LLM training data?
1 points by Hedepig 3y ago|0 comments
41.
by Hedepig 3y ago
Emacs can be anything you want if you build it or what you want is built.
42.
by Hedepig 4y ago
NAL but doesn't a defemation case require proof of malice?
43.
by Hedepig 4y ago
We'll probably have tiered AI systems. Upgrade to the Argue Bot 10 series and save big! With a 3x higher success rate in securing cheaper deals compared to the 1000 series, it's the smart choice for cost-savvy individuals. For an
44.
by Hedepig 4y ago
> think around 4K words 4k _tokens_, 1 token is approx. 3/4 a word. So it's roughly 3k words
45.
by Hedepig 4y ago
32k _tokens_. There are approx. 3/4 tokens per word, so that's around 24k words
46.
by Hedepig 4y ago
This looks good. Is the training data in the repo itself?
47.
by Hedepig 4y ago
The terms of ChatGPT/GPT-3.5 explicitly state that one cannot use their data to construct competitive models
48.
by Hedepig 4y ago
Slightly tangential, is there some kind of crowdsourced effort to build training data for fine tuning? Alpaca used the training data built from gpt-3.5, so there are terms of use restrictions
49.
by Hedepig 4y ago
It brings to my mind the levels of self driving We're definitely at 2 right now, and picking away at level 3. I have heard some people skeptical that we can overcome the problems of truthfulness due to the inherent limitations of LLMs.
50.
by Hedepig 4y ago
> for me I question the objectivity of these percentages
51.
by Hedepig 4y ago
Despite productivity generally improving over the last few decades, wage compensation has not. I'm concerned this will continue as a trend with any productivity improvements from these models.
52.
by Hedepig 4y ago
I don't think that AGI is binary. It's a (very difficult to measure) scale, the tech that OpenAI produced has brought us further along that scale in my opinion.
53.
by Hedepig 4y ago
Despite all the (legitimate) criticisms, I still don't understand how some people are not impressed by what has been achieved by OpenAI. I agree, it's far from perfect, but as a tool it's certainly usable and useful, with qui
54.
by Hedepig 4y ago
I think they could have worded that better
55.
by Hedepig 4y ago
Are you saying you're not impressed by what we have acomlished so far? Do you assume it will stay the way it is?
56.
by Hedepig 4y ago
Do you believe we're at the peak of what will be capable? As shown by this post, we're still discovering what's possible with the tools we have now. Also, human programmers aren't amazing at writing defect free code.
57.
by Hedepig 4y ago
I think most people don't truly grasp how much this will change the world. IMO the advances in Synbio will be vastly more influential than the advances in AI (though AI is utilized heavily for the former)
58.
by Hedepig 4y ago
In their defence they openly state its not for the final product but rather to get _something_ shipped.
59.
by Hedepig 4y ago
Reducing cognative load is still entirely helpful I predict AI assisted archicture design will come soon
60.
by Hedepig 4y ago
> I still find coding a mentally exhausting task and maybe even more now that I am getting older If it helps, we're at the dawn of AI assisted development. That will take a lot of the cognitive burden, allowing us to focus on the &q

More ›