Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
HardCodedBias
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Of course it can do both. They are synergistic.
62.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
"If AI tech goes very well, it can be the greatest invention of all human history" As has been said at many all hands: Let's all work on the last invention needed by humans.
63.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
I think this is key: "On top of that, there is currently no reliable way to accurately measure how AI use among businesses and consumers contributes to economic growth." No doubt people are using it work ( https://www.g
64.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
I will repeat myself: comparative advantage [edit] I will further repeat myself: If comparative advantage will not hold then that's really something, no one understands what happens in that future, proposing some random solution at t
65.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
I upvoted you right off reading the first line. But then you drifted. I have no idea what you mean by "AGI, however, is mathematically impossible." Further, your point about political pushback is short sighted. As AI becomes more
66.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
What a poor take if "AI makes human labor obsolete" Given comparative advantage gives a offramp to this for a lot of what we currently understand as "economics", if the author is positing that we will be beyond this, the
67.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Seriously Guardian, this has to be the least interesting question possible "if AI makes human labor obsolete", I mean FFS talk about a lack of understanding.
68.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
If this had happened it would be scandalous. Unreal, really. Luckily, it sounds like reality was his Gemini account was banned. Much more reasonable.
69.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
"They can't afford to fall behind on it." They are very, very seriously far behind as of 3.0. We'll see if 3.1 addresses the issue at all.
70.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
"These models are so powerful." Careful. Gemini simply, as of 3.0, isn't in the same class for work. We'll see in a week or two if it really is any good. Bravo to those who are willing to give up their time to test for G
71.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
LOL come on man. Let's give it a couple of days since no one believes anything from benchmarks, especially from the Gemini team (or Meta). If we see on HN that people are willing switching their coding environment, we'll know &quo
72.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
It's just poop tier. Come on. Worthless. Do you have any market counter points. Market counter points that aren't really just a repackaging of: 1. "Google has the world's best distribution" and/or 2.
73.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Deepmind was their worst acquisition ever. It is a vanity project that burns cash.
74.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Let's be real. Google leadership is pathetic. Sundar "the manager" has presided over an enormous growth of the businesses he was handed. He also presided over the complete collapse of the internal culture. OTOH he may have fi
75.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Their models are absolutely not impressive. Not a single person is using it for coding (outside of Google itself). Maybe some people on a very generous free plan. Their model is a fine mid 2025 model, backed by enormous compute resources an
76.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Always the same with Google. Gemini has been way behind from the start. They use the firehose of money from search to make it as close to free as possible so that they have some adoption numbers. They use the firehose from search to pay for
77.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
I saw this movie! It was awesome. When that wave washed over New York, awesome! The freezing helicopter, woot! I also liked the South Park parody.
78.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
If this pricing ratio holds it is going to mint money for Cerebras. Many suspected a 2x premium for 10x faster. It looks like they may have been incorrect.
79.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
"The real question is whether the boom is, economically, a mistake." The answer to this is two part: 1. Have we seen an increase in capability over the last couple of years? The answer here is clearly yes. 2. Do we think that this
80.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Gemini 3 is in preview and it is pretty clearly behind multiple iterations for OAI and Ant. It may even be behind open source at this point. Seem telling. Gemini is used in agentic setups by literally dozens of people. Dozens!
81.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Probably true. Not sure about “by far”. But probably best.
82.
▲
Google has every advantage in AI. So why doesn't it lead?
1 points
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
|
9 comments
83.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Of course it makes sense. The regulatory framework is getting more and more difficult for data centers. The options are move to countries with less of an uphill regulatory burden (UAE?), but this comes with other issues. Space it is.
84.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Government employees have power and they are flexing the power. C'est la vie!
85.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
8mo ago
Decades? I mean, yes, the probability of having that level of tech in decades is quite high. But the technology is moving very fast right now. It sounds crazy, but I think that there is a 50% chance of having ready player one level technolo
86.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
9mo ago
Once their vision for "grab and go" vanished due to technological infeasibility [1] the entire premise for the stores vanished as well. I suspect that they wanted to take a hail marry to see if somehow it was possible to get muc
87.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
9mo ago
when I hear of industrial uses of phosphorus my ears prick up since phosphorus is a key limiting factor for life. A world where this actually became industrially very successful combined with a lack of recycling could potentially add large
88.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
9mo ago
I think you're right, but the issue goes deeper. If the productivity gains are real, the incentive to bypass security becomes overwhelming. We are going to see a massive conflict where compliance tries to clamp down, but eventually los
89.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
9mo ago
They will simply be more expensive. More likely they will not use leading the leading edge fab process, which TBH is fine for the vast majority.
90.
▲
by
HardCodedBias
9mo ago
If it were only 20B then Apple would jump at the chance. As would almost innumerable others.
More ›