HackinOut

7 ms·

91.
by HackinOut 12y ago
People are ok to pay. Netflix is a proof. However, IMO it's still not good enough: Netflix is simple and very accessible, but not enough (recent) content. Because content providers are abusing DRM and it's purpose.
92.
by HackinOut 12y ago
I don't think they're that stupid, i.e. they certainly are all for iPods today... But they are certainly very slow...
93.
by HackinOut 12y ago
Ironically, iPod & iTunes were using DRM (FairPlay) on launch! I don't think it's DRM itself killing innovation but the overuse of the actual "control over software and hardware providers". What makes products like t
94.
by HackinOut 12y ago
I think it's used widely enough: God is it ugly... You are screwing up with FPS and then you have to re-encode on top of your already encoded (i.e. not raw), captured thing , eww... Plenty of cleaner ways, like DVD or Blu-Rays which pr
95.
by HackinOut 12y ago
"Sure, the DRM systems have all been broken [...]" I have worked with MS PlayReady DRM (which is the "latest" one from Microsoft, the one used by Netflix) for some time and never stumbled upon any cracks. Not because it&
96.
by HackinOut 12y ago
Here is an x86 emulator in Javascript running Linux 2.6.20 for those who might have missed it (2011): http://bellard.org/jslinux/ From the awesome Fabrice Bellard (qemu etc...) Edit: Formatting, additional details
97.
by HackinOut 12y ago
Apparently you got downvoted because this doesn't answer the question: no data is not insecure data. There is no hardware RNG that guarantees full time availability of unlimited secure data. Even if a black image would generate insecur
98.
by HackinOut 12y ago
It seems to me that this could be very innovative in therm of security by possibly supplanting CSPRNG (Cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generators - many of which (or their implementations) were discovered insecure in the past)