Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
HaZeust
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
You're ridiculous lol
92.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
Curious that you left my other comment to you unanswered [1] when it directly addresses this type of thinking from you. 1 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46545126
93.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
If you do it for the approval and validation of others, you might as well side with the downslopes. You do it for yourself and your own beliefs, some people will put a lot on the line for that - believe it or not.
94.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
Your point is apathy and fatalism. Someone who points to that doesn't believe in building infrastructure. They don't believe in building political power. They don't believe in building local community power. They don't r
95.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
Outside of the pragmatic argument of current-tech limitations for such an implementation, cars should sometimes be a weapon. If all cars were mandated by law to not accelerate when a person is in front of them, doesn't that give carjac
96.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
Why would I watch the obfuscated view? Watch it up close and on the side closest to the so-called "hit" cop - as you say (and silently edited out to "bump"): https://drive.google.com/drive/folders&#x
97.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
>"If you are asking me, it's pretty clear an "action" is already needed." >"I would never take "action" personally though." That's that for you, then. Like I said, spare me.
98.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
>"What are you gonna do about it?" Spare me. I have my non-negotiables for when action is needed. Do you?
99.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
In regards to edit 2, she does not hit the cop. You can see him literally wait until she's out of reverse while hovering his hand on his sidearm, putting himself in the front of the car - so that ANY movement from her after leaving rev
100.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
Another day, another incident to justify the "tree of liberty". ICE has a blank check on power overreach and qualified immunity for a domestic, dominating police state that WE DON'T NEED - and this is how they use it. Their a
101.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
"We live in an era of fraud in America. Not just in banking, but in government, education, religion, food, even baseball... What bothers me isn't that fraud is not nice. Or that fraud is mean. For fifteen thousand years, fraud and
102.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
Yeah, old news? It's how it is today with humans. You SHOULD be making things in a human/LLM-readable format nowadays anyway if you're in tech, it'll do you well with AIs resorting to citing what you write, and content a
103.
▲
by
HaZeust
9mo ago
Well, be the change you want to see. CEOs know that part of the justification of their existence relies on solidarity between each other - and that they can collectively bargain with institutions to remind of that justification.
104.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
>"Rob's opinion (the one that normal people are interested in)." I think you have an overinflated notion of what "normal people" care about
105.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
Merry Christmas, everyone!
106.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
You'll find that in a community full of pragmatic pedants.
107.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
You ought to re-read GP. They aren't saying there's a decision to be stupid, but that it's a byproduct of their process.
108.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
As if the person he was replying to didn't do the same. What's even the point of batting for the status quo like this? Do you enjoy your knowledge being obfuscated?
109.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
No one has done it yet in this comment thread, so I guess I will. This is a fake video [1] created and posted by YouTube user "chad chaddington" on Oct 1, 2020 explicitly as a hobby video in blender. He even notes the following
110.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
The free rider problem is a natural consequence of all-encompassing progressions that benefit multiple parties at the least expense of themselves and each other. Even the logic behind a pareto optimum necessitates the presence of the free r
111.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
>"What you listed is but a tiny fraction." I mean, likewise for you: >"Bell Labs and, separately, the research funded by DARPA."
112.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
I mean, they kind of have to. The last thing you want is some disgruntled Disney-goer trying to get a quick refund or discount for false advertising by saying they, "expected olaf to interact with them, because it looks like he does in
113.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
Yup, here in Jefferson County - roughly 30 minutes south of Boulder County, we were getting wind gusts around 80mph.
114.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
>"how much is Disney's IP license worth" It unspoken business model is giving an IP license to anyone that can breathe at make a rev share agreement or hefty sum - so, less than you think.
115.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
>"The best move is to teach your children how to not be victimized." Your GP advocated world-building a child's physical environment to avoid digital - which is simply unrealistic for their later years as it is, and coddli
116.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
Another buckwild measure for absolutely nothing. Since being directly affected by this in my real life, my resentment for these measures has grown ten-fold. These enforcement agents are costing my family friends everything in real value and
117.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
In an overwhelming majority of cases where social media ruins a life, I've seen it do only one of the following: (A) change a personality toward opportunism; (B) lose jobs; or (C) chase an endless pursuit of vanity. In an overwhelming
118.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
>"I would urge you to look at where the voter fraud takes place, I can't think of a place that spends that much time, money and effort to fake votes that way. Russia, Georgia, turkey and zim just use good old fashioned violence
119.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
Same problems we have today. For the state, at an institutional scale, the incumbent can just have a government agency make up individuals born, or make up SSN numbers, or make up required parameters for one to have a valid voting ID in o
120.
▲
by
HaZeust
10mo ago
>"Neither of these are how you actual voted so they don't really matter." They still negate 2/3 of his necessities.
More ›