HaZeust

25 ms·

481.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I've thought of this since GPT 3.5 - we're probably never going to live the science fiction plot of "uploading" our consciousness to a computer in the act of a transfer, and leaving our physical bodies to inhabit a new d
482.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I used HighLevel for 2 years and have gone to the HL Summit. HighLevel is good, but it's a Zoho-burger: A mish-mashed suite of features, products, and toolset that each deliver a 6-7/10 rating on their own, with the promise of con
483.
by HaZeust 2y ago
These next 4 years will be a hoot and holler...
484.
by HaZeust 2y ago
>"Name a single biological entity that has a better PR department. The only one that comes close is Athlete's Foot, which makes the victim sound cool." Love this line! Phoenix Worm came to mind.
485.
by HaZeust 2y ago
This reply is a nothingburger and I think you didn't know what to add to it, because GP shared something that plainly shows "more money =/= more speech -> more power"
486.
Tell HN: ChatGPT has default responses for each day recorded on Internet Archive
2 points by HaZeust 2y ago|1 comments
487.
by HaZeust 2y ago
"Property of" is an abstraction quickly lost when the chips are down; there is no "Essential" property of something, and your honoring of such an idea (or lack thereof) is a direct reflection of your beliefs and values;
488.
by HaZeust 2y ago
The substance of his comment is still well-intentioned though. I agree with him.
489.
by HaZeust 2y ago
>"I mean young engineers in my company get paid nicely in comparison to their older peers." Yeah, because they're 10% of Gen Z (and I'm part of that 10% Gen Z). Most of my peers, my former classmates, and friends are
490.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Exactly! Should have also worded that section similar to your comment here, but you hit the nail on the head.
491.
by HaZeust 2y ago
We've already talked; but let's squash what appears to be a feeling of a lack of answers for you. Truth is, this has been a learning process for us all with these tools, but it needs to be understood -- especially going in -- that
492.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Learn how to think ontologically and break down your requests first by what you're TRULY looking for, and then understand what parts would need to be defined in order to build that system -- that "whole". Here's some gui
493.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Every single prompt hack I listed are ones with studies that show it positively increases performance. Since the most contested one in this thread is the "tipping" prompt hack: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.03729
494.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Some of my projects are public, most are private. The ones that will typically do me better in people networking and/or will bolster my portfolio, are the ones I share publicly. For most of my projects, private is the default. With a p
495.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Nah, most are hundreds a month - a few golden geese can break the thousand barrier, though. But, regardless, have a few of those sites up, and you're making good side income.
496.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I'd actually love to see a benchmark on this - we're just speculating now.
497.
by HaZeust 2y ago
That's actually a solid question! You can probably ask GPT to AI-optimize a standard technical spec you have and to "ask clarifying questions in order to optimize for the best output". I've done that several times with p
498.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Only sharing my experiences and observation in the upcoming trajectory of these tools; you're free to have your own. I will tell you this, the second most-used language in my day-to-day (TypeScript) is one that I've seldom sat dow
499.
by HaZeust 2y ago
That's rather assuming of you, they're there no less than they would be for a human's programming - and VERY likely no more.
500.
by HaZeust 2y ago
> If not, can somebody recommend resources related to learning how to accomplish non-trivial code generation? Learn how to think ontologically and break down your requests first by what you're TRULY looking for, and then understand
501.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I have, that's how I'm telling you the way you can, too.
502.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Then you should be as pro-AI imposters as it gets!
503.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Millions of laypersons a month search "convert (file type) to (file type) online" and just smack an AdWords embed on their site for it. Millions of people want a QR code's embedded link in their camera roll, without access to
504.
by HaZeust 2y ago
What's this question even mean? Because they're the only ones that came up in the debugger portion of the IDE, the output serves the intended purposes, the logging and error handling that I wanted to include were in the initial wr
505.
by HaZeust 2y ago
What evidence would you like? You're posting on a thread that hyperlinks to a list of code and Claude Artifacts for pet-projects that can make thousands a month with some low-effort PPC and an AdWords embed, and some mid-size projects
506.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Tell it to write code like a Senior developer for your respective language, to "write the answer in full with no omissions or code substitutions", tell it you'll tip based on performance, and write more intimate and detailed
507.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I've used GPT-4 to do what I had said. I pasted the errors I was given, and did so for 2-3 more iterations, and it successfully ported critical in-house infrastructure from Python 3 to Go.
508.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Well, that's too bad - isn't it? The world will sometimes change before your very eyes, and you'll sometimes be in a group that's affected at the forefront. C'est la vie - never become too comfortable that you stifl
509.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I said this last year[1] and still FIRMLY believe it: "It's even crazier to me that we've just... Accepted it, and are in the process of taking it for granted. This type of technology was a moonshot 2 years ago, and many expe
510.
by HaZeust 2y ago
While I get where you're coming from, I think there's a middle ground that isn't just "let everyone in" or "shut it all down." One idea is a market-based immigration system—basically, you pay an entry fee

More ›