HaZeust

46 ms·

421.
by HaZeust 2y ago
After deadline, though? Even textualists will be hard-pressed to say the enshrined 90-day extension can be exercised after enforcement is actuated - whether by date or action.
422.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I don't think this compares, but I do see where you're coming from. Whereas the present SC has unanimously upheld this TikTok law, The Court has avoided taking a position on federal non-enforcement of marijuana laws in states wh
423.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Your second sentence is paramount, it wasn't written for this far out.
424.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Read the last few words in my GP, I know. Also, a law drafted by Congress AND an SC ruling upholding it??
425.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Do you think he should? Do you think it's a healthy exercise in the country's checks and balances for the president to create a precedent where he directs the justice department to not enforce a law when Congress has drafted it, a
426.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I'd like to discuss the pop-up's content. If it comes out to be that one guy, President Trump, CAN pass an executive order that effectively ignores a law that Congress passed AND the Supreme court upheld unanimously, it's a v
427.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I think you and GP are in agreement.
428.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Ha! I was going to say, I haven't managed to spend less than $100 for weekly grocery since before COVID at Costco, wonder what his secret is.
429.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Relaxing focus for me doesn't cause merging or cross-eyed effects, it causes my vision to go too blurry to do anything lol
430.
by HaZeust 2y ago
It works for me like every tenth time I cross my eyes to look at a "spot the difference" picture. I don't know how it works for people instantly.
431.
by HaZeust 2y ago
>"Wouldn't social desirability bias predict that people would be reluctant to support Mangione's actions in any way which might be traced back to them personally?" I think you inadvertently answered your question with
432.
by HaZeust 2y ago
"How wrong" is something I can't quantify. It’s tough to pin down a single “modified margin of error,” but I’d say it’s bigger than what the poll shows. Multi-tier questions automatically have smaller sample sizes per option,
433.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I thought you were someone else, but now that I know you're not - I want to make something clear: I think that social desirability bias affected the answers of respondents much more [1]. To be clear, that's not the MARGIN of error
434.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Give me a break. The polls weren't based on who will get the popular vote. They were based on electoral votes, with swing states polls being that exact toss-up (you can check them again). He ended up winning every single swing state, m
435.
by HaZeust 2y ago
>"even in those western societies sex was seen differently as long as it was within the same class." Same with violence! Not too much institutional change made for gang violence between 13-21 year olds in Chicago - as long as t
436.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin , 133(5), 859–883. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6117379_Sensitive_Q... >"Social desirability concerns ca
437.
by HaZeust 2y ago
I actually got it last night from someone else reaching out and that's why I was alerted to this, haha. Cheers!
438.
by HaZeust 2y ago
>"It wouldn't change the basic picture of Mangione's support in the YouGov poll." My single sentence underneath the horizontal divider in a sub-thread that primarily diverted to discussing the 2024 Election polls, and
439.
by HaZeust 2y ago
2024 election polls were wrong. Every single one had it either at a coin-flip odd between the two, or Kamala leading 1 point. It was 2 months ago, this isn't hard to remember. How it came out, in fact, was Trump winning popular vote
440.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Relying on any form of polls for a political subject after their performance for November 5th is something else, that's all I can say to your edit.
441.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Me as well, but instead highlighting their lack of commitment to morals and integrity; rather than standard of truth or behavior - equally valid take, mind you!
442.
by HaZeust 2y ago
This entire song-and-dance from executives, media, platforms, and the general "status quo preservationists" over the last month in response to Luigi is priceless. They seem to have a high desire to place any disrespect they can on
443.
by HaZeust 2y ago
>"Projecting much? That doesn't describe me _at all_." Didn't you just project, too? Lol. My comment is based on the writings I've seen here over the coming years about this technology.
444.
by HaZeust 2y ago
What's this even mean?
445.
by HaZeust 2y ago
You're probably close to the same in everyday life - as are everyone around you, but I suppose that's valid.
446.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Does it? It doesn't even notify you of new replies.
447.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Cheers!
448.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Can you please add this to your pinned top comment? This was incredibly hard to find as a comment, and a BBC bearing is actually pretty important to this topic.
449.
by HaZeust 2y ago
Rolling on laughing floor
450.
by HaZeust 2y ago
GPT is blunt, critical, and highly opinionated if you tell it to be. That's what I don't get about people on this forum. GENERATIONS of STEM professionals who have it engraved in their head that a computer will only do what you

More ›