HKH2

39 ms·

631.
by HKH2 3y ago
> future passive participle, typically ending in -ndus, -nda, -ndum. ... > It means that something needs/ought to be done. > something needs/ought to be done. > "she who must be loved." All of your examples a
632.
by HKH2 3y ago
When you have kids you have no time to be lonely.
633.
by HKH2 3y ago
If you could isolate processes like that, sure.
634.
by HKH2 3y ago
What about cognitive dissonance?
635.
by HKH2 3y ago
Despite our best efforts, we are deeply irrational. Our thinking is based on instinct, not on core principles; it's a top-down approach driven by feelings.
636.
by HKH2 3y ago
So would you say he manufactured consent?
637.
by HKH2 3y ago
Yes, that dictatorial approach to music has already begun to disappear. Our appreciation for music will not disappear. It is time for democratised music.
638.
by HKH2 3y ago
I doubt that taste is that arbitrary. Regardless, do you think our value systems are that dependent on what other people think? Do I really need someone else to confirm that something tastes great or looks great? I guess in the future extra
639.
by HKH2 3y ago
The GP seems to agree with you. How can you construe the second paragraph as being negative?
640.
by HKH2 3y ago
> But in the end it’s never only about the final piece of music/canvas/etc it is about the person that did it. Nope. Good art stands on its own merits. The only useful thing about knowing who did it is that you can find more of
641.
by HKH2 3y ago
We already have synthesizers.
642.
by HKH2 3y ago
> We may still occasionally have songs going viral, but those will be only short flashes of popularity, nothing that lasts for weeks or even months, and they will be forgotten quickly, lost in the flood. Good. The latest is not necessari
643.
by HKH2 3y ago
> We have always experienced music together. That hasn't been true since at least gramophones. > And nothing means anything anymore. What’s the point? Just background noise? I'm gathering that you generally don't listen
644.
by HKH2 4y ago
I have a music playlist program which deals with the problem of getting used to music. It's effective because I seldom want to choose a track to play, and I don't find myself skipping a lot consecutively. I have a dedicated key fo
645.
by HKH2 4y ago
Nor does it pad out writing because the publisher wants a certain number of pages.
646.
by HKH2 4y ago
If only we had ideal conditions...
647.
by HKH2 4y ago
Do you want them to worship their creator?
648.
by HKH2 4y ago
Lawrence Krauss did not deliver what was written as the title of that book, but calling him a hack is not nice.
649.
by HKH2 4y ago
> If you admit to ever using LSD or psychedelics, even one time, you will be automatically disqualified from serving in the military or law enforcement (go figure). Well how many hits do you need to understand that everything we do could
650.
by HKH2 4y ago
If only we could get Dogme 95 for documentaries. There's always music telling you how to feel.
651.
by HKH2 4y ago
I guess you could say philosophy is a protoscience.
652.
by HKH2 4y ago
Do you think it'll set a precedent for going after American heads of state?
653.
by HKH2 4y ago
Reading requires that you use your imagination to make words make sense. It is not passive.
654.
by HKH2 4y ago
Sorry. I'll try to avoid rhetorical questions.
655.
by HKH2 4y ago
You're correct. There is no consent violation. Signal is just nagware.
656.
by HKH2 4y ago
Since when does harassment require intimidation? Maybe it's a regional thing. Anyway, the basic principle is respecting someone's refusal of something. Signal can harp on about how good they are, but they are far worse than even W
657.
by HKH2 4y ago
> As we continue to build Signal to be an alternative to the surveillance tech that dominates most of our digital communication, we will remain attuned to the different ways that people want to connect and build ways for them to do so wi
658.
by HKH2 4y ago
More space between the up and down arrows for us phone users.
659.
by HKH2 4y ago
Exactly. How can a zero transmission rate be anything else?
660.
by HKH2 4y ago
> I don't think that's the main driver for most women. I never asked if it was the only factor. > Smart people will care about who you are, not what you have. Smart people don't talk themselves into believing things and

More ›