Guvante

68 ms·

481.
by Guvante 3y ago
IIRC the only opportunity was Obamacare, which at the time made sense since the abortion was protected by SC precedent. Unless they eliminate the filibuster (which they don't have the votes to do) the Republicans will always block such
482.
by Guvante 3y ago
We will spend $26.1 billion on pork in 2023 ( https://www.cagw.org/reporting/pig-book ). The budget is $6.4 trillion. You wouldn't notice 0.4% lower costs (not to mention we are hugely in a deficit this year so ther
483.
by Guvante 3y ago
Your logic is flawed fundamentally. Should we disallow encrypted traffic between machines because that encrypted traffic could be CSAM? Saying "X is bad so we should be rid of it" requires a method to get rid of it. Obviously givi
484.
by Guvante 3y ago
100% this is sketch. I was thinking if this was a supported security model you shouldn't be able to take control without disabling the TPM. But it isn't so not the OSes problem.
485.
by Guvante 3y ago
I think it is fair to say that OS configuration to fix this should be required. I agree with the logic that by default the OS is doing the right thing without any changes to support this model.
486.
by Guvante 3y ago
Technically, but really the fault lies in the OS for providing an exploitable prompt that doesn't break the chain of custody of the boot process on failure.
487.
by Guvante 3y ago
I don't know why a photo wouldn't be evidence. The delivery person stealing doesn't make it not theft.
488.
by Guvante 3y ago
So the problem is you as the receiver can't say the package was stolen only that you didn't receive it. If you have a porch camera that shows a theft then that is reportable. "Amazon says they delivered it but they didn'
489.
by Guvante 3y ago
The only justification for avoiding displaying them is wanting to hide something. To your point actual pass through fees are transparent. So what don't they want to show you? The claim of packaging is a crock of shit. Cox won't gi
490.
by Guvante 3y ago
What makes something a pass through fee? Does access to a conduit count? Does sales tax count? Pass-through fees is a vague category that effectively means "I spent money" which is useless.
491.
by Guvante 3y ago
There is an explicit exemption for mandatory charges. If Comcast decides to change it's rate because of those fees it can explain that.
492.
by Guvante 3y ago
It could be the failure mode is identifiable on the OS and Linux didn't add detection and fallback support. Honestly though it could also be workarounds. Windows is king at making stuff like this work by hard coding overrides. E.g. a c
493.
by Guvante 3y ago
Volume matters and if the majority are outside that window it shouldn't impact the majority. Again though the bar for Judicial overriding a consistent ruling should be very high. And they consistently made this choice.
494.
by Guvante 3y ago
Futures manipulation is hard when the future is controlled. Futures aren't as impacted by price as you imply under the effects of market manipulation. While you might have a change due to expected resiliency generally futures don'
495.
by Guvante 3y ago
See also: - Experimental - OS Ain't no body going to use your OS generally speaking.
496.
by Guvante 3y ago
I feel like the ruling just says "futures cannot be less risky than assets" which is a weird call for a judicial review panel to make. Especially since it wasn't financial risk but fraud tracing risk. I don't believe tha
497.
by Guvante 3y ago
O(n^2) is a pain. Just updating everyone with what happened in a tick requires 4,000,000 data points a tick at 2,000 players. At 10 Hz that is 40 million updates a second. There are caches and prediction that can help but I ignore all gamep
498.
by Guvante 3y ago
I do think you adding "if they took data" to this is a bit odd given the original post makes it very clear their defense relied on not taking data or changing anything.
499.
by Guvante 3y ago
Did MLB promote baseball cards saying that their profitability would lead to increased value? Because in this case the company did exactly that. While they didn't call them securities they marketed them as securities.
500.
by Guvante 3y ago
Ehh, the government has tools to solve that they don't use. Not saying it is an easy problem just that it could be solved more directly. Honestly our federated nature and in fighting make a real solution super difficult. If you tackle
501.
by Guvante 3y ago
We have an inefficient distribution of benefits in the US. Hell we are in an active housing crisis because of inequality. Sure you won't starve but the idea that the wealthiest country in the world can't house everyone isn't
502.
by Guvante 3y ago
You imply a hypothetical investor would do that. Typically they are only interested in injecting money for growth. If there is insufficient profit to satisfy their cost of capital expectations they sell off or fire until it does. Our growth
503.
by Guvante 3y ago
132 miles of railways is never going to be cheap. It can be cheaper of course but never cheap.
504.
by Guvante 3y ago
Did you read the third paragraph? My post was "if they offered risk mitigation 2-3% would be fine but they don't"
505.
by Guvante 3y ago
Zero percent loans don't bother me at all. It is the 25% APR that I think is a problem financially.
506.
by Guvante 3y ago
In case anyone missed the first line like I did this has been resolved and no longer works like this.
507.
by Guvante 3y ago
Anything that reports to credit bureaus counts. Also I am always surprised when people don't treat CC expenses as they would cash... CC interest has always been intolerably high to me. I totally get emergencies and now I am out money.
508.
by Guvante 3y ago
> “Take that!”, those of you saying 2% to 3% is a small price to pay for security, fraud, and payment risk mitigation. 2% for that service is worth it 100% and anyone who disagrees doesn't understand the math. 3% is probably too. Th
509.
by Guvante 3y ago
My point wasn't well made you are correct. It was that there needs to be a distinct target language. Encoding the source language in a more compact form without meaningfully changing it beyond superficially isn't compilation. Like
510.
by Guvante 3y ago
I never said scripting languages can't have a compiler. I meant a compilation step means you aren't interpreting anymore. Apologies for my inexact verbiage.

More ›