Groxx

7 ms·

61.
by Groxx 2mo ago
That seems inevitable for laws that try to address private behavior, yes. It'll waffle around and strike randomly as it gets tested more and more in court to narrow the definition, and that gradually causes a chilling effect around the
62.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Seems like you don't have to rule it out completely? "You might also like this show" is rather different than YouTube's "OMFG SHORTS WATCH THEM NOW" experience. Even if the line is fuzzy, I think many can agree
63.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Plus a rather clear lack of investment into improving it / retaining their talent / etc, yeah: https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/ Anecdotally: at work I saw quite a lot of github-uptime-re
64.
by Groxx 2mo ago
They've already separated the wiki's version control, why not CI? And the issues/discussions are just vendor lock-in wrapped in a shiny UI.
65.
by Groxx 2mo ago
> You are quoting my passage for you to do something, not solve it. Which is claiming I'm doing nothing because you haven't seen it. The implication is that you're disregarding "my ideals" unless I do something
66.
by Groxx 2mo ago
> No one can live your ideals for you, if you think something should be done, you should do it, and quickly at that. If it is that urgent, why are you not doing anything? This is the world-hunger-equivalent bit fwiw. It's rather e
67.
by Groxx 2mo ago
You've been complaining that people blocking datacenters (which is partly succeeding) is worse than fixing the EPA. Something is being done, urgently (vastly faster than the larger legal system), and public outrage is loud and annoyi
68.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Freeze as many applications as necessary to reserve room for the DE so I can choose what to do? Surely that's obvious to other people aside from me. It's an attended system, not a headless server in a rack hundreds of miles away t
69.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Honestly, anything that gets people paying attention to stuff that has been building for decades is good in my book. I agree that'll be a much better end-state to be in, but is it the best right now ? ... idk. We're in an increas
70.
by Groxx 2mo ago
By then it is too late, plus they never pay enough in damages. And the EPA does not have teeth currently, and damage will be done while fixing that too. So people fight by pattern recognition: abnormally incentivized and extremely large? K
71.
by Groxx 2mo ago
It can be an issue for the community in the same watershed, as well as being affected by what they do with any waste water. There have been quite a lot of extremely-drawn-out lawsuits about them drawing more than claimed, dumping hot water
72.
by Groxx 2mo ago
To anyone visiting on mobile: if you don't see any buttons, switch to the desktop version in your browser. Evolve is one of a relative few that have been around and growing for a long time, and easily have months of (gradual) content.
73.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Noise pollution is definitely being discussed: https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2026-04-2... There are many reasons to not like these things nearby (anywhere it affects power or water too).
74.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Ehhh... when it truly is two tests bodged into one, then sure. But sometimes you do this kind of thing to avoid useless test brittleness: does your test check that `doSomething()` does what you expect, or do you have another test for that a
75.
by Groxx 2mo ago
This sounds like a job for Fast Fallback instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Eyeballs
76.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Yeah, this has always been my take too. Assuming an even 8h split on weekdays, the awake-not-working time is heavily eaten up by commuting and general upkeep. Family squeezes into shared upkeep and any remaining time at best. The two weeke
77.
by Groxx 2mo ago
All three: their own quite aggressive pushing of LLM coding as a whole.
78.
by Groxx 2mo ago
I think it's fair to say they're better at a paragraph or so than most humans. And have been for quite some time, which is probably why their use in writing has exploded. Long form though? Still pretty bad. Probably getting worse
79.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Yeah, I really don't see much of a reason for Go to get a first-party linked list type. In most cases in non-list-oriented languages the performance and ergonomics are awful compared to a competent growable array type, the mechanical s
80.
by Groxx 2mo ago
> Alice sends out Alice can send anything in any cryptographic scheme involving two parties, the only real safety in any of it is "are the odds of an accepted different value low enough to be impractical for an attacker". Does
81.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Not sure what you're trying to claim here tbh - Oct 23, 2018 is what the answer checker is looking for, it correctly judged "April 22, 2019." as incorrect: https://logs.epoch.ai/inspect-viewer/c79c08da&#
82.
by Groxx 2mo ago
No, they're not mutually exclusive and tons of go code uses both to implement some kind of semantic. They serve moderately different purposes because their semantics are quite different. Select, however, is encouraged very widely, and
83.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Broadly agreed, the concurrent Go code I've gotten out of them has been absolutely riddled with issues, and they're even worse at writing tests for it. They can get tutorial-level code on the first shot almost always... but tutor
84.
by Groxx 2mo ago
No thread/goroutine handles for fork/join handling from "outside", and no generics for many formative years that influenced tons of habits, then significantly weaker generics (improving very soon[1]), have all led to mos
85.
by Groxx 2mo ago
> Content generated by Claude may not carry a detectable mark if, for example: ... > A file’s metadata was stripped through format conversion, re-saving, screenshots, or other means Ah. So what essentially every single consumer-ori
86.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Since they do have the input, they could probably just store checksums at each step... ... though I'm not sure why that would be preferable over a coarse rolling checksum over all of the output. Seems like that wouldn't influenc
87.
by Groxx 2mo ago
It's rather common for posters to make a very small summary in a comment. It can help fight the floods of comments working off the title alone (though it's not particularly needed here for that purpose, imo)
88.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Or I just disagree with your premise (there are lots of Bad Influences from chronological sort, and I'm far from the only person who considers it "an algorithm" in the social media sense because of that), and you're look
89.
by Groxx 2mo ago
Fair (I haven't been using the encrypted-reasoning systems, though this is common in open ones - I'm kinda surprised it's an option in encrypted ones too), though what they're doing here is cross-user replays in addition
90.
by Groxx 2mo ago
> We take a trace produced by a frontier model, replay it into a weaker sibling, jailbreak the weaker model, ... Ha! I've been wondering if replaying across models would work, ever since https://blog.cryptographyengineer

More ›