Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Groxx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
541.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Yeah, I personally know a couple people where self-research found the correct diagnosis, and I am one of them. We had a fantastic primary, who worked with us quite closely and did a lot of research after we found some new information from h
542.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
tbh I thought it was explicitly stated somewhere. literally every seller I've talked to has mentioned it at some point.
543.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
- click simulate in the default "push button to turn on LED" demo - clock advances - voltage around the LED slowly rises to infinity for some reason er.
544.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Six feet under, but those piezoelectric speakers are piercing
545.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Those extremely rare moments when you open the door literally on zero, with no sound, and the display showing 0s, are like half of the reason I use a microwave. Man vs machine at its most visceral, it makes me feel alive
546.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
In some states, employers are required to provide this as an option, at least for some devices: https://www.driversnote.com/blog/state-requirements-cell-pho... Obviously it should be everywhere, for all tools needed
547.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
I really wish they'd name-and-shame the brands. I don't see how hiding it helps encourage better behavior. If anything, it seems like they should be publishing legal ranges, and rewarding testing labs that catch things outside i
548.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
after an initial "... is that a misquote too? sounds super low" I decided to hunt around. I haven't seen anything on that low of a dose... but doing the math, it does seem to make some sense I suppose. a rough check of t
549.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
If software filters are reducing total light by 50% while only affecting blue-ish tones, and that's a total light level comparable to multiple brightness steps on a Mac... tbh I think it's reducing it quite a lot. Many I see u
550.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
From seeing the feeds of a few categories of people near me (some using it semi-professionally, some just personally, some like me that avoid it unless strictly necessary)... it really does seem to be all of them. Absolute garbage is a maj
551.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
that'd give you 2.5mg, which is still almost 10x more than what I linked. it's possible to split and separate them enough of course, but beyond "roughly half" it gets rather difficult. I've considered getting the
552.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
So the main claim presented here is that reducing blue reduces total "light" (lumens? watts?) by 50% (totally believable), and that reduction in light is all that matters for sleep? That seems reasonable. The pseudoscience wank
553.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Yeah, I'd really have liked to see something like [Trio]( https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ ) gain mid more attention in Python. Structured approaches can prevent a huge amount of those issues, and Python
554.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Not true! There are a fair number of them, and they're even reasonably general-purpose, e.g. https://www.ponylang.io/ Most that can recall achieve this by simply not having any locks at all. That's feasible with s
555.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
They're particularly bad about concurrent go code, in my experience - it's almost always tutorial-like stuff, over-simplified and missing error and edge case handling to the point that it's downright dangerous to use... but i
556.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
I suspect a significant amount of that is due to requiring more than one file (the binary itself) and having to learn about multiple packaging and distribution systems. That's a gigantic wall to climb compared to "put a binary o
557.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
It is somewhat different when your system forces binaries to be signed... but yeah, largely agreed. The abject refusal of curl|sh is strange to me, unless the refusers are also die-hard GPL adherents. Binaries are significantly more opaqu
558.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
The Arch wiki has rapidly become my go-to source for every time I need a real answer... and honestly it should just become my default for everything Linux. It's astoundingly high quality, some of the best content out there whether or
559.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Evil deserves to be called out as evil. Why should we constrain the discussion to anything else about them? The absolute best thing they can do for the world would be to disappear, as soon as possible.
560.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
An account that's 24 years old? That doesn't raise any warning flags for me, only possibly-positive ones.
561.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Yeah, so far I see mislabeled-pilot, and episodes 3 and 4. That... does not (currently) look like "Babylon 5 is now free to watch". That looks like a minor probing to see if they can charge for it again somewhere. That kind of thi
562.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Yea, it was really only ever "libpurple let you easily use them all in one app nearly transparently, and many people did". Many did use XMPP under the hood, but afaik almost literally none federated. Matrix is seemingly trying t
563.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
XEP equivalents: as far as I can tell, as a mostly-outsider, that's covered by "MSC"s: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/tree/mai... described by https://spec.matri
564.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
It's overwhelmingly more of an outsider talking point than an actual issue in practice. There's a category of people that just says any extensible protocol must fundamentally have massive amounts of incompatibility, and brings i
565.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
That doesn't give you a way to exclude conflicting code, unfortunately, so you can't provide an optimal one for non-test code with it. And stuff like `func SetTime(...)` in a _test.go file only works for tests in that same package
566.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Unless you use Cloudflare (or roughly any other DDOS protection system), in which case you're letting those companies MITM all requests on purpose. Protected between you and Cloudflare by PFS and any other acronym you like. I think the
567.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
I suspect that using a build tag (say `test`) and two function definitions (one that directly calls `time.Now()` and one test-only one that uses a mutable var) will optimize out to zero cost in the non-test case - last I fiddled with that
568.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
And unlike Matrix(/Element), it works most of the time.
569.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
"some", where "some" is scaled to match the overwhelmingly unprecedented amount of money being thrown behind all this. plus all of this is about a literal astroturfing machine , capable of unprecedented scale and abili
570.
▲
by
Groxx
8mo ago
Particularly because "you must use only an approved passkey manager" is fairly easily solved by MDM, which is already widespread. It's DRM, and it will go down exactly the same anti-user and anti-competitive route as every ot
More ›