Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Groxx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
451.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
Earth is just part of the same recycling collection plan, it's fine.
452.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
Stars kinda famously fuse elements up to iron as part of normal operations. And even if you exclude that, the entire solar system is leftovers from a previous star - all that is inside our current star too. Sure, much of it isn't at t
453.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
My first "player encounter" was with someone who patiently took me through many of the basics for over an hour at the very beginning (like 15 minutes in), then tricked me into attacking them so they could blow me up and get away w
454.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
I would love to see this kind of thing as a Gaussian splat image, so the sheen at different angles is captured. It's somewhat important to making it look realistic.
455.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
So... it's essentially the same thing that has been on the ISS for three or four years?
456.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
You are also guaranteed to be able to retrieve your data, just query for '... is null'. No complicated logic needed!
457.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
There's a number of people who effectively use tmux as their window manager - one terminal window doing literally everything. Locally as well as remotely, but it's more... understandable for remote, where other options are often
458.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
If I didn't intentionally request non-transactional mail, it is spam. By definition. Mark it as such.
459.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
I can definitely believe explicit levels has more actionable errors. Type-shenaniganry without identifiable names can be pretty awful to unravel. On that note though, I haven't found a whole lot of documentation or blog posts around tr
460.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
It's far less studied and didn't exist (to any usable degree) at the time it was made. And it's extremely different, organizationally, so it's a difficult migration to pull off. And it has different incentives. And most
461.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
Yeah, they are quite uncomfortable. A clear "form before function" decision, and one of many "the wrong people are deciding things" signs :/ I like the idea of fully blending the notch, rather than just rounding sli
462.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
tbh I'm not getting GPT-voice from this
463.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
> Why a Total Order, Not a DAG? > This is a deliberate design decision. lock_tree uses a DAG, which lets you declare that branches A and B are independent — neither needs to come before the other. Sounds great, but it has a subtle pr
464.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
> "Read and change data on all websites" does not, to me, imply "make network requests on the user's behalf" Yeah, I don't like this phrasing either, I think it downplays the risk to a dangerous degree (whi
465.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
Some proxies, iptables extensions, and OS-provided tools exist - there's almost certainly a combo that would work for them. What platform? Unless it's for a custom physical device, then uh. idk. Probably something, proxying thr
466.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
- click install - "It can: Read and change all your data on all websites" It's not alarming sounding enough for what that implies, but "it can trigger requests under its control" seems fairly obvious from that. The
467.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
If there's no downside to leaving the ladder in place, then I would think yes - there's a reasonable expectation that people will die due to your actions. You'd likely have to argue about "involuntary manslaughter"
468.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
It's fairly easy to test out: https://onlinetonegenerator.com/ Anecdotally, bells have always come through fairly clearly for me. They filter out lower tones, not higher + sine waves. Nothing about this adds up to mo
469.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
I've seen more than one half-joke-half-serious chunk of code that would "encode" arbitrary info into stack traces simply by recursively calling `fn_a`, then `fn_s`, `fn_d`, and `fn_f` before continuing with the actual intende
470.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
They're kinda like high-effort shitposts. Which are my absolute favorite kind. The worse the effort/reward payoff, and the more it makes you ask "WHY??!!?", the better.
471.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
tbh I think that vote would succeed, if one happened right now. his approval poll results are abysmally bad. what do you think the vote would be, though? "we don't like him"? last I checked, change.org-petition-style voting d
472.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
Those who can't see a significant change in quantity also have selective memory
473.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
wouldn't this be solved by synchronously invalidating everything before computing anything? it seems like that's what the described system is doing tbh, since `setValue` does a depth-first traversal before returning. or is there
474.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
similar here, I'm gradually removing more and more things from my phone. at this point it's mostly just a couple actually-important apps, a web browser, and messaging apps (because it's clearly superior to whipping out a lap
475.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
afaict it applies to literally everyone. there's a variable "sweet spot" of course, but once you get out to "extremely wide" it's reliably worse for everyone, and there are LOADS of computer monitors that qual
476.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
I mean, some, sure. but it's a choice, and not all choose to do that. and I've watched quite a few (of all ages) escape it when they realize how much it's harming their ability to do what they need to do.
477.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
yea, this is in javascript. it's inherently single-threaded in almost all contexts (e.g. node.js shared memory where you're intentionally bypassing core semantics for performance, and correctness is entirely on you)
478.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
Aside from being a bit small and having to be held close, phones are good proportions for reading. Computers screens have gotten wider and wider, and UIs bigger and bigger, and it eats into reading space pretty heavily. Especially if you do
479.
▲
by
Groxx
6mo ago
Nothing about this requires an app. Just an ID. Forcing the app is almost certainly for tracking purposes and justifying the decision for whatever braindead higher-up decided it was a good idea, therefore it must be made to work.
480.
▲
by
Groxx
7mo ago
yea, I like the /x/ repos a fair bit. "first-party but unstable" is an extremely useful area to have, and many languages miss it by only having "first-party stable forever" and "third party". you n
More ›