Grimeton

10 ms·

61.
by Grimeton 2y ago
20+ Motörhead concerts (I stopped counting at some point) destroyed my hearing a long time ago. Everything louder than everyone else!
62.
by Grimeton 2y ago
Never understood how people could fall for this scam. You want the best guy for the job not the most colorful.
63.
by Grimeton 2y ago
There are so many things that can go wrong when scripting in the shell. If you don't sit down and play with it, trying to understand what's going on, then no guide will save you. : "${foo:=bar}"
64.
by Grimeton 2y ago
Maybe using Javascript in such an environment is not the best of ideas.
65.
by Grimeton 2y ago
What's the quota, Kenneth?
66.
by Grimeton 2y ago
https://tortoisegit.org/ Just saying...
67.
by Grimeton 2y ago
> Please read this section carefully: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2986#section-3 Yeah, go read it: The certification request information consists of the entity's distinguished name,
68.
by Grimeton 2y ago
>The CSR contains the digital signature of the public key that is requesting the certificate. So you absolutely need the private key to create a CSR. How would you create a CSR with just a public key? Do you really not know what you&#x27
69.
by Grimeton 2y ago
> Again, completely off the mark here. To create any CSR, bifrost or not, you need the private key that the CSR represents. Yeah... No. You create a public/private key pair and the CSR CONTAINS that public key together with additi
70.
by Grimeton 2y ago
I'm talking about sending the CSR to the server that runs on http. Bifrost CA server is a plain HTTP server that responds to X.509 Certificate Signing Requests (CSRs) sent via POST requests. The server validates CSRs, signs them,
71.
by Grimeton 2y ago
Of course I would. It's Google! They can do it! And obviously they did. How else do we explain people with petabytes of data on Google's drives when the term "unlimited" meant "30GB"?
72.
by Grimeton 2y ago
There is a commonly and widespread accepted definition of the term "unlimited" If anyone uses it outside of that definition, it needs to be disclosed upfront. If that didn't happen, then it's "unlimited" as in
73.
by Grimeton 2y ago
Step into the fire, get burned in the fire. Stop politicizing everything.
74.
by Grimeton 2y ago
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...
75.
by Grimeton 2y ago
There are bookmarks. Google it.
76.
by Grimeton 2y ago
When I have the UUID, then I can get a CSR signed on the server because that's all that's needed. Creating a CSR creats my private key for the CSR and once the CSR is signed and the certificate is returned I have a valid keypair.
77.
by Grimeton 2y ago
I'd suggest reading up a bit more about X.509 CSRs and Certificates before assuming that private credentials are being transmitted in the clear. Nobody suggested that. But I said that it is said in the article that the UUID n
78.
by Grimeton 2y ago
Yeah listen, the more I look at this, the less sense it makes. It’s pretty simple: I understand the server running on http only has the possibility in mind that there is a reverse proxy that terminates TLS. That’s fine. Running the server i
79.
by Grimeton 2y ago
The current state of AI in one single image: https://imgur.com/a/PxpyFPu
80.
by Grimeton 2y ago
I think the question wasn't about the technology. The question is why doesn't android more intelligently manage Wifi connections. Yeah and the technology is not able to provide the information to manage WiFi connections
81.
by Grimeton 2y ago
Yeah I understood this, the issue I'm facing here is the following: When I grant access to services/information based on certificates presented to me by a client, then I want to make damn sure that the certificate is not handed ou
82.
by Grimeton 2y ago
I read this text three times, what problem are we trying to solve here? What am I missing? Yes I understand that this is about "automatically" rolling out certificates, but what problem of that process is solved by this server?
83.
by Grimeton 2y ago
Thank God. I still don't know how we made it through cold war w/o these organization...
84.
by Grimeton 2y ago
>I only see Article 7 and 8 re Consent - as long as the consent is freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous - it should meet the requirement. Just a theory: Could a "****COOKIE CONSENT POPUP*****" be one of the ways to
85.
by Grimeton 2y ago
First of all, the problems you describe belong to different layers in the OSI stack [1]. You need to understand this stack, to understand what I’m talking about. The first one belongs to layer 1 of the ISO/OSI stack. As I’m leavi
86.
by Grimeton 2y ago
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL... Have fun.
87.
by Grimeton 2y ago
published June 28, 2024 Time traveler...
88.
by Grimeton 2y ago
Everything you've done in your post, DNS already does for you. Versioning is done via the zone file's serial. You can just create a backup via dig @nameserver axfr ledoma.in And you get the zone file. By comparing the se
89.
by Grimeton 2y ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/ShittySysadmin/comments/1di1cjl/i_l...
90.
by Grimeton 2y ago
This has nothing to do with my threat model. First of all, not every country allows the ISP to spy on its users. Then, by using the ISPs DNS resolver, there's a high chance when browsing a well known site, like ycombinator, I hit the I

More ›