Grimblewald

7 ms·

91.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Claude thinks it's chatGPT, and various chinese models sometimes, whats up with that?
92.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Aicon is reasonable for areas where it's required, but "solving" things in areas where for millenia it wasnt required simply removes the pressure to act. This would be the opposite of what's required right now, which is
93.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Remember strawberry? I do. Rememver gpt2 hype? I do. the hype isnt real, its marketing designed to inderectly siphon capital from the less informed. The current USA government is no stranger to a grift, so they'll get it. Not that I ag
94.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
And nothing of value was lost
95.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Great post, and largly captures my own experience. I can only speak for my institution, but eagerness to lock down ip and keep ownership of everything tightly controlled and out of the hands of said nerds/inventors doesnt really incent
96.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Then you have to fight, not just the battle but the war. Its not enoygh to get people to back down, keep going, go for the throat. Demand the resignation of the politician proposing the bill. If theres no risk for trying, theyll keep trying
97.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
> session limit reached
98.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
The USA is, albeit rapidly waning, an important part of the tech world. It lets me know that when invited to the USA to share my knowledge and skills, I am best serving my interests by declining such invitations and instead proposing that t
99.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Kinda straight-forward to understand backlash when you see how it's being handled. It's being forced on people without any option for opt-out. Most of the time, does not deliver on what is promised. Has obvious ethical and moral i
100.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
I think all this started with post opus 4.5, that's when claude started wrecking my shit without extreme oversight. Codebases it was making positive contributions to before were slowly and constantly being eroded and wrecked. Give it t
101.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Corporate America never backs down. It simply rallies and tries again later until people are too fatigued to care. The only solution is to abandon ship, which I am doing. MS walked back in OS ads the first few times, but ultimately we still
102.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Am I being paid to do anthropic's work for it? See my comment history for some examples in another thread, but generally I see no reason to catalogue this for a model Ive seen no evidence of being worth the effort. I'm overworked
103.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
I wear a few hats, but as a chemist and I'm not happy with fable. As a statistician I'm not happy with fable. As a data scientist I am not happy with fable. As an academic and a researcher I am not happy with fable. It's usel
104.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
yeah, but gemma models are shit, objectively speaking. I've been building edge AI tools for my lab group, and gemma lineage hallucinates so much it cannot be used at all. We're almost exclusively using qwen models. Given no image
105.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Its like they don't understand the problem common crawl solved rather neatly. You think the skid scrapers are bad? Wait till the competent players lose access to CC.
106.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Cheaper isn't as much of a problem as functional.
107.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
FAQ point 5 is pure comedy.
108.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Bit odd it was missing at all. Makes me wonder how well the core infrastructure you're building on is understood, and how trustworthy any of this really is. If all I'm getting is some vibeslop, with zero expertise or skill added,
109.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
1. It's unfinished 2. Textbook slop dump and run we can see one big initial push, not too suspect. Then a few superficial updates, and then nothing for months. Unfinished, broken, and ostentiably abandond due to being an unmaintaible n
110.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Burden of proof that ai tools aren't dogshit isn't really on me, so pipe down and use a more reasonable register you pissant. This site, even this thread is filled with evidence. You're in no position to demand anything, espe
111.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
Always with this topic of articles I find a common theme. No one defines the load-bearing terms and just assumes we all mean the same thing by it, which we know is not the case. That lack of engagement with the topic always has the same eff
112.
by Grimblewald 4mo ago
I've had some really dumb refusals. Explaining elements of infrared specteoscopy, researching aritifical bud-breaking in agriculture, etc. Anything interesting and non-mainstream is banned. Basically, restricted to answers i'm bet
113.
by Grimblewald 5mo ago
Double should map to endash, tripple for em.
114.
by Grimblewald 5mo ago
Alternatively, no one sounds like an llm, an llm sounds like someone, typically those close to the median of the training corpus. If AI were genuinly capable of novelty, it would be a big deal, tech bros having enough work ethic to design n
115.
by Grimblewald 5mo ago
Well, they've mostly left reddit as well, afaik. It's a few stragglers, people being paid to push agenda, and auto-moderation now. I was reading / moderating reddit for over 4 hours a day, every day, for close to a decade. He
116.
by Grimblewald 5mo ago
I maintian a log of tasks, prompts, related information etc. So i can repeat past workflows verbatim, and I can qualitatively say each model beyond 4.5 has been a regression, and it would not surprise me 4.8 continues the trend. Each iterat
117.
by Grimblewald 5mo ago
Your position is that of any normal human. Google is committed to evil however, just look at how playstore notifications are tied to sales spam. Want payment notifivations? Gotta take the ads as well, not seperate toggles, one toggle. Drink
118.
by Grimblewald 5mo ago
AI is like sex. I don't mind it, heck in the right situation I'm quite partial to it. However, if you keep trying to sneak it on me while I sleep, keep trying to slip it into agreements, keep involving people i didnt consent to be
119.
by Grimblewald 5mo ago
6*7=42
120.
by Grimblewald 5mo ago
Unit word per unit meaning is lower than average human, far lower than average technically capable human, the 'hallucinations'/'mistakes' like you said, overall composition and thoughlessness in visual presentation

More ›