Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Goety
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
I think you know the answer
32.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Can we avoid this somehow? Dang massive disappointment
33.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Well... What is your solution for this?
34.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Damn AWS is still getting hammered
35.
▲
Bob Dole, WWII hero and former Republican presidential nominee, dies at 98
(nbcnews.com)
1 points
by
Goety
5y ago
|
1 comments
36.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Wayy too young
37.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Hostile political forces are present.
38.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
why are they just targeting the israeli firm?
39.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Share price is going to get a nice squeeze
40.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
This is one thing that has bothered me with recent twitter.
41.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Great question and I hope this gets answered. Most industries in the US only care if a location has water capacity rather than sustainability issues.
42.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
A few weeks ago it was from an older Chinese test. It would be quite disturbing if the ISS was destroyed and then China would offer cooperation with theirs.
43.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
I hate that they have to preface it with "we hate these guys but..."
44.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
They found the gap in the armor.
45.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Regulation could easily reverse the flow of data
46.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
I wonder what their marketed replacement is going to be
47.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
>If the DoD disappeared tomorrow, wouldn’t pretty much the entire world immediately build up their militaries? The people who want the first part to happen also want the second.
48.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Wireless and perhaps contactless neuro-sensor and neuromodulation is an achievable goal.
49.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
imagine how torturous telepathy would be if you couldnt turn it off
50.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Maybe they were saying haha we know where you patrol
51.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Yup. Weird connections with Tesla.
52.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
We're so fucked arn't we?
53.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Your last paragraph has definitely increased my optimism. I wish i had more time to reply. I might have to wait for another weekend for this. >there are also a huge number of opportunities -- it is (hopefully!) going to make it possible
54.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
I dont think you understand how valuable this information is for someone who is a layman. I really appreciate the response! Oh shit so the math and detection gets stupid difficult at higher mag fields because of wavelength/scale and co
55.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
What is it about a stronger magnetic field in practice that decreases b1, b0? Is it that we cant create a strong magnetic field with good homogeneity in a small space? Are sensors also a limiting factor?
56.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
Can we engineer a human backbone behind these services to be resistant to corruption and complacency for security sake? We did an ok job with nuclear weapons but only just.
57.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
>In what condition? Well that's the question right? Without nuclear there may not be a middle ground as an option for a lot of people. >So your just suggesting we go back to the middle ages? No, thank you. I'm not suggesting
58.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
which is why i included 'or [support] changing the narrative' i appreciate your language as well.
59.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
>Energy is a fundamental need for society to flourish. Energy is needed for basic modern services. Humans have survived a long time without electricity. It could be simpler to 'go without' or 'find a workaround' for a
60.
▲
by
Goety
5y ago
This wasnt an inevitable conclusion post 2008 but apparently it is one we may need to examine.
More ›