GhettoMaestro

18 ms·

91.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> I don't care about winning or losing. But I don't know how to say, "whatever, moving on" in a way that itself doesn't get interpreted as further pettiness. I struggled with this for years. In the end I just set
92.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Thanks for clearing that up. I had incorrectly assumed that something other than SRP had come along to fulfill this need - I guess not!
93.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
I feel dumb asking this, but does current industry authentication methods (secure channel via TLS) send the actual password, or a derived challenge-response value through the secure channel? I thought it was the latter.
94.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
It amazes me how cheap these application-specific chips have become - it opens up so many new potentials. I can only guess that something like this would cost $1000+ roughly 10 years ago?
95.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Is CW used for radar applications? (I am only familiar with pulsed radar sets).
96.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
My friend I am so sorry to hear of your spouse's medical condition.
97.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> Fair point. I don't know why I had a mental block and the idea of a recall never entered into my mind. Because us tech people have been successful at hand-waving away product defects as mere planned obsolesce; we think about it as
98.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> [...]their ethnicity ratio considerations [...] I really hate coded language like this. Call it what it is: race-based social engineering. Yeah, it doesn't sound as "nice", right? Something to ponder deeply.
99.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Cringe.
100.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> [...] Do you think he couldn't fund and equip 100,000 mercenaries if his monopoly were threatened? [...] In abstract, from the numbers sense (dollars), sure, your argument stands that test. However, it does not stand the common se
101.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
The good ol days of inband signaling / payment schemes ;)
102.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Flamebait? He is pointing out the hypocrisy of Tim presenting himself as the moral guardian of the web.... as Tim ran W3C for all of these years.
103.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
You know what? Fuck it. Ban me. If you really think the above comment is egregious, fuck you. Dumb motherfucker.
104.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Bullshit. If firing up a piece of software creates an unauthenticated, unprotected (non-TLS) endpoint to read-write data, that's a loaded gun. That is PRECISELY the default behavior of ES. ES has jacked around for years by making TLS a
105.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
My understanding is that Netflix will pretty much subsidize the cost of the CDN box to nearly any ISP above a certain minimum traffic level ingress from Netflix. Great model to attack the incumbent [transport / transit] carrier costs -
106.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> At some point you just have to call out people for being utter morons. The blame is on them, 100%. [...] Your attitude is a symptom of a broader issue that plagues this industry: Indifference to risk*probability. If you don't ship
107.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
What's the line? There always is one. Example: Child pornography. The banning of child pornography is legally sanctioned censorship. The legal argument being that the content is "Child Abuse Material" (CAM), which is audio-vi
108.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Quite possibly the three best movies of my childhood.
109.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Friends don't let friends create RaidZ pools. Bite the bullet of the cost of N*2 mirrors.
110.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
The edge traffic makes up 99%+ of the traffic in question.
111.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> Even in war very few people would be this brutal now, we have moved beyond what we were and I hope we can do it again. While I appreciate your sentiments I can’t help but feel that you are quite incorrect. ISIS? Burning people in cages
112.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> 5. If you are one of two founders: Don't have sexual intercourse with the wife of the other founder of the company. He will find out and because you have 50/50 shares in the company, everyone needs to pick a side. This destro
113.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Technicality: You're not referring to the 1%, but something like the .01% or even .001%. The difference between 1% and .01% income is staggering.
114.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Right. And why is it a blackmail-able offense? Because it is prohibited. Complete circular logic.
115.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Why, for smoking weed on the Joe Rogan show? Weed and security clearances are such a non-issue. I had a TS/SCI for years but opted to not get it renewed. Why? I like to smoke weed and don't wish to cause issues with my employment
116.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
I believe a separate room (sealed with automatic closing door) and an air extractor/scrubber is required for indoors usage. Where I live, you can offer a smoking section outdoors, but honestly, the air extractors are pretty cheap and h
117.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
No. He has repeatedly made the same comment (or "meme", "canard"). It is not insightful commentary; it is not much more beyond propaganda at this point. California has made horrible financial decisions for over a decade.
118.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> I still can’t believe it’s legal to move from SF to Texas if you were born and raised in SF. You owe the good people of San Francisco repayment for raising and nurturing you. Leaving after all that education and local services is a cor
119.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
This is nothing more than an extension of technology enabling both good actors and bad actors. I refuse to penalize/water-down technology solutions available to good actors because there are a handful of bad actors that make some of us
120.
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
Makes you wonder what secrets he took to the grave. Thus the military security right up to the very end.

More ›