Gerardo1

10 ms·

91.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
I agree, but I think there's good reason to be skeptical of the effectiveness of current targeted online ads (in terms of actually getting people to buy products and services that are advertised), and I don't see how AI could make
92.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
1. yes, with reservations 2. yes! but I'd like specific things that a lot of models don't do well quite yet, like accurate, complete citing and contextualizing with quotes across sources, etc. 3. Eh, pretty unexcited but I can se
93.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
That's not a fair comparison. The user in the word example already had access to the infringing content to copy it, and then paste it into word. But it has to have that copy, verbatim, to produce it, as you acknowledge. If dropbox was
94.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
A conversation about subjective morality is tangential to your original comment and the conversation we're having, but its odd to bring it up as if you are aware of the concept of subjective morality you kind of run head-first into why
95.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
If you can expand on why Pablo Escobar expressing a similar sentiment is a useful comment, I'll write an actual response with some substance.
96.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
That is in no way a counter-point, rebuttal, or useful comment.
97.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
People should be advocating for their own values and morals. To be an ethical person is to understand your values and do the work to apply them in your everyday life.
98.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
> Honestly, Matt gets my kudos if for no other reason because he's the bigger man (relatively speaking) by engaging in artful trolling instead of plainly undressed insults. That is a pretty plainly terrible mindset, but one that I d
99.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
But you just made a strong claim about something you are here saying we can't know?
100.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
That sounds like solid pricing strategy, I get that. You should put that information loud and proud on your website. Are you sure your insurance will cover work that's not done by, not validated by, and never even seen by one of your
101.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
Does your product produce any work that isn't examined and approved by one of those licensed agents?
102.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
I don't have any, and indeed I've not criticized or questioned anything about real estate. I've questioned how you'd support some of the claims you made that were overly-broad and seemed disconnected from the technology
103.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
This is, yet again, Y-Combinator backing an AI startup that is a terrible idea, with people who don't recognize what a terrible idea it is (the responses by the poster in this thread smack of inexperience and someone who hasn't th
104.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
That seems like very high-risk work. How do you manage that liability?
105.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
> Blockers for getting humans out of the loop Do you think that people want humans out of the loop when it comes to buying and selling real estate?
106.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
> Edit: AI is currently being coded up to mimic my behavior/tone/advice/etc. You, as a licensed attorney, are training an LLM to give your clients legal advice?
107.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
> I think the AI agent actually can more easily ignore your race / age / gender I challenge you to support that idea in any way. > because it is not programmed to go look up those things The concern is what it's trained
108.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
So do you actually do real estate agent things: make contracts, review contracts, communicate with your client, negotiate on behalf of your client? Or are you an information service specializing in real estate information?
109.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
That doesn't in any way address the question the other commenter was asking?
110.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
...So being up-front with your pricing, even if that's a "our fees are negotiable but tend to be (flat rate or percentage) around the X range" is a "race to the bottom"?
111.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
In a world where there is very, very rarely only one person writing about a given subject: yes.
112.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
Did you get the piercing because you expected it might help (and if that's the case, would you mind sharing why), or did you get the piercing just for aesthetics and then discovered it helped? I'm not looking to pick apart your st
113.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
It is, and it's interesting that they seem to stay around. They don't add to the conversation in any way, and in fact attempt to de-rail and dismiss conversation without engaging with the material in any way whatsoever. It's
114.
by Gerardo1 3y ago
I keep bringing this up, but this launch HN post about Roundtable: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36865625 still shocks me. It's a company that uses AI to produce survey results. I'll let you read their pi
115.
by Gerardo1 3y ago
This seems a lot like trying to invent a problem to justify your metrics rather than acknowledging that your metrics don't align with the actual performance of the team. There's no indication in the article that the team was strug
116.
by Gerardo1 3y ago
can you prove to me in a verifiable way that no matter what prompt I put into ChatGPT, it won't give me pornography back?
117.
by Gerardo1 3y ago
I'm not asking your average person for therapy or to help diagnose or work through my mental health issues.
118.
by Gerardo1 3y ago
I meant more in this community specifically, and, after the AI tool meant to fabricate survey results, YCombinator generally.
119.
by Gerardo1 3y ago
I think you're being far to mild: this absolutely is letting an LLM give people not just medical advice, but medical treatment This is absurdly dangerous, and I"m continually astounded by the lack of push-back, especially in this
120.
by Gerardo1 3y ago
How can you be reasonably sure that that work sufficiently addresses the bias? What metric(s) are you using to measure bias in general, and what do those metric(s) look like before and after your tuning?

More ›