GeoAtreides

6 ms·

91.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
> I'm writing this with technology I will never fully understand that's on you. It takes just a bit of effort, and I suppose time, to have a very good idea of what happens, at all levels, between the moment i had this comment i
92.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
ah, an actual, not a base insult, but a pure ad hominem in its natural state!
93.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
>companies growing 3x which companies are growing, the ones mining for gold or the ones selling the shovels?
94.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
exactly! if you _properly_ integrate this argument into Scotland, _then_ it will be a true scotsman, otherwise definitely not!
95.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
How about if you were a working class child, just before they started in a mine or a textile mill? Was it good for them? Infant deaths decreased for a while (and NOT because of the industrial revolution): > These patterns are better expl
96.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
>HN autokills comments it detects as LLM No it doesn't. Unless you have proof.... ???
97.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
For a concrete statue there sure are suspicious large amounts of straw peeking through
98.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
>the vote on limiting Switzerland's population to 10 million google searches 10 minutes after it passes: what is EU ‎guillotine clause
99.
by GeoAtreides 5mo ago
So wait, does this mean that Google will forcefully uninstall the apps I currently have installed?! or disable? will the apps work again once I went through the 24h process?
100.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
> it refused to even touch the code. ??? please i beg post the prompt and the refusal I literally can not imagine a model refusing to do something
101.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
Why would a series of articles imply repetition? Let's presume there's a series on re-making the antikythera mechanism: 1. Metallurgy: finding, mining and smelting the ore 2. Building the tools (files, molds, etc) 3. Designing the
102.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
>I have no clue what I read. Just totally odd and unconvincing. How can it be unconvincing if you didn't understand the argument presented in the post?
103.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
The line is consent. The line is always consent.
104.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
>In terms of the Amazon... that was done BY humans... the cattle didn't tear down any trees literally the funniest thing I have ever read on HN, well done
105.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
> Now I just have to wait till prices come down on ssds again oh man, do I have some really bad news for you: https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/chart/SNDK
106.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
let me put this way: not your ram, not your cache, not waiting patiently for your input.
107.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
what are you arguing? that people should not violently overthrow their corrupt leaders? that the french should've let the Ancient Regime entrench and continue? That the serfs (slaves) in tsarist Russia should've stayed put and not
108.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
was the guy who recently torched a warehouse not a threat? >“You know, if you’re not going to pay us enough ... to afford to live, at least pay us enough not to do this,” the man says while lighting a roll of toilet paper on fire.
109.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
>structured queries there's always pseudo-code? instead of generating plans, generate pseudo-code with a specific granularity (from high-level to low-level), read the pseudocode, validate it and then transform into code.
110.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
I see. I must congratulate you on your rhetorical prowess, it's nice seeing a professional at work.
111.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
I was just enumerating some of the issues with the '''solid''' points OP made. Actually addressing them would take too long and be exercise in futility, here, in HN, in april 2026. Why would I put in the effort
112.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
he doesn't have solid points, he conflates fair use with free use (?), ignores thousands of years of attribution history, and equates normal human to human learning with corporate LLMs training on original content (without consent). Gr
113.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
hey, if they can prosecute for whistling into a handset...
114.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
I am very sorry, but you are wrong. Between the fall of Rome (476 AD) and the Carolingian empire (~800 AD) there was a period of not only standstill, but regression, devolution and forgetfulness. Compared with what came before, it can be ri
115.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
introspection and rumination are two different things
116.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
no conditions! what, you didn't know your content would be free for LITERALLY EVERYONE when you made your account? and that you can't delete your comments? and it's a free for all? well, that's on you buddy, not HN, defi
117.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
>Anubis was enabled in the tar pit at difficulty 1 (lowest setting) when requests were pouring in 24/7 >difficulty 1 (lowest setting) literally in the comment you're responding to
118.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
there is nothing contradictory in what i said, and if you weren't favoring a very literal interpretation of my argument you would agree. but, in the spirit of critical reading education, what i meant is: human attention good, machine i
119.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
your ability to not address my argument main point is something to behold. can't tell if you're doing on purpose or not. if humans read my blog posts and then things without credit that would be fine. i like human eyeballs and i l
120.
by GeoAtreides 6mo ago
>It's less proof of work and just annoying to users, and feel good to whoever added it to their site, this is being disproved in the article posted: >And so Anubis was enabled in the tar pit at difficulty 1 (lowest setting) when

More ›