Galanwe

12 ms·

181.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> historically there were open-loop deployments in many European countries Indeed, there used to be things like "Moneo". The problem is that banks never trusted really these systems, so you were limited to, say, 50E of stored v
182.
by Galanwe 1y ago
That seems really great, .moving imports in-line for CLI tools startup and test discovery has always been a pain.
183.
by Galanwe 1y ago
Wait, still no support for the new MCP features? How come Claude Code, from the creators of MCP, is still lacking félicitation, server logging, and progress report ?!
184.
by Galanwe 1y ago
I used to be of the same opinion, but after giving type hints a real try, I changed my mind. You should not see type hints as real, hard types, but more as a kind of documentation that helps your linter and type checker catch mistakes.
185.
by Galanwe 1y ago
I see Redox as an incubator of new developments for a low level Rust ecosystem. It's not a production ready OS, its purpose is to spark new ideas, propose alternative implementations, try on new paths, etc. I see them implementing a ZF
186.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> What is getting replaced is the bottom of the barrel: interns and juniors But in the context of highly skilled work, I don't think anyone hires juniors or interns to actually do any productive work. You typically hire juniors for
187.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> Seasoned Rust coders don’t spend time fighting the borrow checker My experience is that what makes your statement true, is that _seasoned_ Rust developers just sprinkle `Arc` all over the place, thus effectively switching to automatic
188.
by Galanwe 1y ago
I mean, Odin is admittedly vastly different from C in terms of syntax. It's not like you can pick it up knowing C, it feels like a different language. The author even states that Odin started as a Pascal clone, and was more influenced
189.
by Galanwe 1y ago
Yes, it goes beyond mere dotfiles. There's a LUKS setup, PAM setup, ufw setup, yay/aur setup.
190.
by Galanwe 1y ago
I don't count Odin as a modern C, because it is IMHO too different syntaxically to fit that description.
191.
by Galanwe 1y ago
The way I see it, it's for people who want a more modern C, but not C++. There's not much languages in that space, essentially C3 and Zig, but the former is much less advanced IMHO (also in terms of tooling).
192.
by Galanwe 1y ago
There may be something I don't get then. What can you _not_ do in a graphical terminal that you can in a pure HW console? Why would you not setup your graphical terminal to be full-screen on whatever column/row count, what's
193.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> The author listed several reasons why they want it. To be fair, they listed reasons to need a 80x25 terminal, but not reasons to need a 80x25 console. I'm a bit unclear as to why they could not use a regular 80x25 term in their g
194.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> I am always flabbergasted when people make such statement Sit down, have a coffee, re-read your whole comments, create bullet points for your case, and try to have an *objective* look at your arguments. - Your are frustrated with your
195.
by Galanwe 1y ago
Well, first, this a purposefully contrived example, that pretty much does not happen in real life scenarios. So you're pretty much acknowledging that there is no real problem by having to resort to such length. Second, what exactly wou
196.
by Galanwe 1y ago
I mean, I don't have the market shares at hand, but if Ubuntu is still on the top, that's one _mainstream distribution_ that heavily emphasizes snaps.
197.
by Galanwe 1y ago
I am not even thinking of `uv`, but rather of pyproject.toml, and the various improvements as to how dependencies are declared and resolved. You don't get much simpler than a toml file listing your dependencies and constraints, along w
198.
by Galanwe 1y ago
At the end of the day, you do you, but my experience with SElinux is that using it on the desktop is vastly overkill. At a high level, the essence of SElinux is to limit the possibilities of exploitation and escalation by carefully specifyi
199.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> spent days wrestling with Python dependency hell I mean I would understand that comment in 2010, but in 2025 it's grossly ridiculous.
200.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> Especially for a desktop OS like Omarchy shipped with a bunch of apps and "plugins". Omarchy is _just_ a set of scripts to have a nice looking Arch Linux and some helper scripts for day to day tasks. It's not a distribut
201.
by Galanwe 1y ago
This...would be insanely amazing. A _real_ laptop with a proper 13" eink display at 75Hz!
202.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> I ended up losing a finger You forgot to mention Stanley Tools paid for the hospital bill.
203.
by Galanwe 1y ago
To buy books ? I don't know of any other book provider with an extensive catalog. Also Amazon often have authors into a exclusive agreement, so it's not like it will change anytime soon.
204.
by Galanwe 1y ago
From what I remember, it was because I needed an old version of the Amazon Kindle app, to download a less secured version of Kindle books, to then convert them to epub with an old deDRM plug-in. Essentially the whole process is not doable n
205.
by Galanwe 1y ago
I loved my RM1, by far the best e-ink reader/note taker I have had. I had to switch to a Boox though, as I grew bored of having to maintain a Windows VM with a downgraded Calibre to convert my Amazon purchases to ebooks for reading on
206.
by Galanwe 1y ago
> Wow, paying himself $150k after tax from donations! That's wildly more successful than I would have guessed. (Not saying it's undeserved.) There's an article somewhere on the rationale of Andrew's salary. From the t
207.
by Galanwe 1y ago
Zig CI runs all compiler stages, I guess that's why. Does not seem crazy to me.
208.
by Galanwe 1y ago
- Moral rules are never really effective - Legal threats are never really effective Effective solutions are: - Technical - Monetary I like the idea of web as a blockchain of content. If you want to pull some data, you have to pay for it wit
209.
by Galanwe 1y ago
This is not the same, you introduced dynamic function resolution (i.e.a function pointer tied to a specific instance), we are talking about static function resolution (purely based on the declared type).
210.
by Galanwe 1y ago
I don't quite agree, especially because the implicit this not only saves you from explicitly typing it, but also because by having actual methods you don't need to add the struct suffix to every function. mystruct_dosmth(s);

More ›