Galanwe

7 ms·

91.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
Even if you rebuy it at $100 it's the same, your profit didn't change, you just exchanged cash for an asset. Before you sold it you had unrealized gains, after you sold it you had realized gains, after you bought it again you have
92.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
> This is not gain at all. At least in theory: You own some tons of gold at the start of the process, you have the same tons of gold at the end of the process. I see a lot of comments like this but I just can't get my head around wh
93.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
I don't think they cared about realizing the gains. They just wanted to roll to a new position on higher standard ingots. It just so happen that it meant selling/buying, which realizes the gains.
94.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
I don't get your point. Gold price increased, the gains were unrealized, now they realized when they rolled to a new position. The only nitpick would be that they did not mention the benchmark rate, so it's hard to guess the absol
95.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
I don't think there is any moat here, most European countries have these kind of "deprecated" laws, that are not enforced and just stay there because it's too much of a hassle to remove. In France, I think there are stil
96.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
Makes sense, thanks for clarifying!
97.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
I am not familiar with the tech stack they use, but from an outsider point of view, I was sort of expecting some kind of fuse solution. Could someone explain why they went through a fake shell? There has to be a reason.
98.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
My son is now a fan of your site, thanks for sharing !
99.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
Pretty much the answer is Proton (mail, storage, password manager, VPN calendar, etc)
100.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
The willingness to fight until the end, whatever the cost, is not something you rate a priori. The thing with war is that once you have it for a certain amount of time, you create a generation of people whose kids died, wife died, neighbors
101.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
> Now that the indicators have leaked, they will most likely be rotated. They can't really do that. Now they have no way to distinguish "this is a user of a non updated Claude code" from "this is a user of a Claude co
102.
by Galanwe 6mo ago
> I doubt there was much of a moat there anyway. There is _a lot_ of moat. Claude subscriptions are limited to Claude Code. There are proxies to impersonate Claude Code specifically for this, but Anthropic has a number of fingerprinting
103.
by Galanwe 7mo ago
Because there is a quadrillion trusted CAs in every device you might use. A good chunk of these CAs have been compromised at one point or another, and rogue certificates are sold in the dark market. Also any goverment can coerce a domiciled
104.
by Galanwe 7mo ago
Hey, thanks for jumping in. So I did spend some time retrying it today, and while I can see some improvements, it is still not in a shape where I trust it enough to replace ttyd. Some feedbacks: - The UI is bloated with not-so-useful widget
105.
by Galanwe 7mo ago
Remote Control is buggy a hell, the websocket keeps disconnecting every 10 minutes. And the UI is unusable on mobile.
106.
by Galanwe 7mo ago
I tried various solutions around this. CloudCLI (ex claudecodeui) looked promising, but very buggy (disconnects, UI overlapping text, etc). Tried Claude Remote Control as well, but also very buggy, websocket disconnecting, UI broken. I ende
107.
by Galanwe 7mo ago
Index funds and ETFs also have strict replication rules limiting the amount of non-physical replication in their legally binding prospectus... The more physical a tracker is, the lower the tracking error, but also the more fees you have to
108.
by Galanwe 7mo ago
This is all good and we'll on the IaC side,yes. But at the end of the day, buckets are also user facing resources, and nobody likes random directory / bucket names.
109.
by Galanwe 7mo ago
What I described is essentially how the vast majority of E2EE messaging platforms work. And I say that having worked for one of them.
110.
by Galanwe 7mo ago
I fail to see the link between private conversations/DM and E2EE. To quote a comment I made some time ago: - You can call your service e2e encrypted even if every client has the same key bundled into the binary, and rotate it from time
111.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
ICANN really is a shame. There is no oversight, no enforcement, no sense of duty of what being the custodian of internet naming system entails.
112.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
I don't quite get your point. The signer is blind to what it signs, but that does not mean there is no identity per se. A signed key is still unique. - You can still check that user 1 and user 2 don't use the same key. - You can s
113.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
> Why don't we just get a key from the government? Because one could argue that the government could keep track of the keys they give away. That is where blind signing is interesting. The government can sign _your_ key without knowi
114.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
Well there are technical solutions for this: blind signatures. I could generate my own key, have the government blind sign it upon verifying my identity, and then use my key to prove I'm an adult citizen, without anyone (even the signi
115.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
I don't think the legal path is how these issues will be fixed. If the Trump administration have proven anything, it's that law can be ignored with very little consequences.
116.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
> I’m trying [...] to save life and property from severe events at scale Tell me you work in Silicon Valley without telling me you work in silicon Valley. Sorry but I couldn't resist. There is something in US startup mentality where
117.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
> `defer` is still in "spooky action at a distance" category Agree, this is also why I'm a bit weary of it. What brings me on the "pro" side is that, defer or not defer, there will need to be some kind of cleanup
118.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
I don't understand why destructors enter the discussion. This is C, there is no destructors. Are you comparing "adding destructors to C" vs "adding defer to C"? The former would be bring so much in C that it wouldn&
119.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
I get your point, though in the specific case of defer, looks like we both agree it's really a good move. No more spaghetti of goto err_*; in complex initialization functions.
120.
by Galanwe 8mo ago
I don't think anyone serious believes this. Replacing developers with a less costly alternative is obviously a very market bullish dream, it has existed since as long as I've worked in the field. First it was supposed to be UML ge

More ›