Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Galanwe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
601.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
Maybe because it's easier said in an HN comment than in real life
602.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
This kind data modelling happens all the time in quantitative finance, where you need to run historical scenarios (backtests). We just call that "point in time" (PiT) data. There can be multiple dimensions of timestamping, but you
603.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
"Cheaper" is not the only dimension to consider. Using managed services is also faster, more reliable, and scale better. You cannot just get that for free.
604.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
You don't have to use AWS' appliance (the NAT GW) to do NAT. You can NAT your traffic yourself from a t2.micro Linux. AWS used to maintain a AMI to do just that, nowadays you have to do it yourself, but it's honestly not much
605.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
> isn't investing into a company with a bad ESG sub-component(s) a good idea? Yes, that is the paradox of the ESG finance trend. Using a quantitative approach, you can use the CAPM to show that at equal risk/return, increasing
606.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
> In my experience with multi-threaded programming, C++ code with "careless sharing issues" is often filled with multiple threads accessing the same object and relying on convention to avoid calling the wrong thread's meth
607.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
I don't quite see how Rust approach to multithreading is that amazing. Rust does nothing to magically prevent race conditions for you. Rust safety does not encompass race conditions, starvation, etc. What it does is defensively prevent
608.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
> No, no the same thing. Well to me it is the same thing. Two threads sharing state through a common heap, or two processes sharing state through a shared memory is pretty much indistinguishable, at least on Linux. The question is not mu
609.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
Not sure why this is downvoted, I never had much issues with the GIL as well. Multiprocessing does the parallel computation pretty well as long as the granularity is not too small. When smaller chunks are needed most of the time that's
610.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
I don't quite get your "unpopular opinion". First, I don't see how the GIL would have much to do with free multithreading. The GIL should not have much observable logical impact on multithreaded _Python_ code. It should
611.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
You forgot dead animals and syringes
612.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
I see you've fixed it already, kudos for your reactivity!
613.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
Note that you're also not opting out of "meilisearch telemetry". You are sending full laptop specs of your users to meilisearch. Which in turn sends them to Twilio apparently.
614.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
subprocess.run(f"curl -L https://install.meilisearch.com | sh", shell=True) Just went from "cool project, might try it" to "nope".
615.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
Well not every program has to be a super robust daemon recovering from any kind of problem. There's a good bunch of programs that are just supposed to read some inputs, perform a task and crash with an error message and exit code if an
616.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
Reading articles and publications is part of the job of quantitative research, and being a judge of their quality and reproducability even more so. So, in all fair honesty with you, no I will not give you recommendations.
617.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
> Do you buy on Tuesday to exploit the pattern? > Or do you buy on Friday because you are not a unique snowflake and others will notice the same historical pattern and therefore reverse it in the future? Well you would typically do bo
618.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
> You describe a world where you can watch the pattern slowly fade out and stop when it is gone. Yes, this is a phenomenon that happens very often during alpha research. You discover something that is decaying already, and you join the w
619.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
While I agree that the article is somewhat vague and imprecise, it is not accurate to encompass all statistical predictions as statarb either. That would more be what "quantitative" is. For a strategy to be considered statistical
620.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
What is showcased here is a dummy pair trading example on single stock vs basket. Of course it does not work anymore. There are a lot more evolved kinds of statarb though, that still work nowadays, and most likely new ones that we don'
621.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
Statarb, the pair trading form, has been known since more than 20 years
622.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
There are more dimensions to this that just the tech stack. - Industry: focusing on big tech or quant finance would be a good choice. That's where the money is IMHO. - Expertise: if you invest on being the best, that will pay off. - Ne
623.
▲
by
Galanwe
3y ago
No just HFTs use microwave. Most big DC players (e. g. Equinix) provide access to a MW antenna, as well a dedicated links to PBs and exchanges PoP.
624.
▲
by
Galanwe
4y ago
If I understand correctly, you have a remote server with a logfile, and some markers in this log file tells you whether the build is in process or finished. I would suggest you keep it simple and simply poll the logfile for the latest occur
625.
▲
by
Galanwe
4y ago
> Can anyone ELI5 what it is in practice? What are some of the ideas that allows one to débrouiller, etc... ? Broadly speaking, it refers to one's capability of being smart in a "handy man" field. Your tire is flat and you
626.
▲
by
Galanwe
4y ago
Americans
627.
▲
by
Galanwe
4y ago
EA is a philosophy, or a mindset. It is not defined by the actions of some group of people that pretend to follow it. There will always be some % of cheaters in whatever human system that exists.
628.
▲
by
Galanwe
4y ago
I don't think one donates money to Harvard just for the sake of a plaque. I guess there is some sort of indirect benefit to be had after such a donation, like an entry pass for a child, an entry pass for a PhD, or something of that vei
629.
▲
by
Galanwe
4y ago
I would pay for that as well. All it needs is some kind of Android app.
630.
▲
by
Galanwe
4y ago
Hum, but my understanding was that the whole point of the normalization was that the raw scores are not in a scale that is meaningful outside of the symposium which they were placed in? Does it really make sense to compare raw scores from d
More ›