GTP

7 ms·

61.
by GTP 3mo ago
I never meant this. You should read my comment in the context of the discussion. And I'm also explicitly saying that the EU needs improvement.
62.
by GTP 3mo ago
Probably this is the point, and it's a point that has been brought up a lot of times in the past, maybe less in recent times: you need to know the things you're applying an LLM to. In this way, you can keep the good outputs while
63.
by GTP 3mo ago
On the other hand, USB-C wouldn't have become a true standard if no-one forced Apple's hand. It's a compromise and, for the time being, I'm happy with this. As another commenter noted, if we feel the need for a new stand
64.
by GTP 3mo ago
Yes, definitely. Just as an example, my country wouldn't have a lot of consumer protection laws we now have thanks to the EU. As a concrete example, there used to be a single phone service provider acting as a monopolist and we had the
65.
by GTP 3mo ago
You might have a point. But, at the same time, AFAIK the only manufacturer that complained about USB-C (and, coincidentally, making the exact same argument as you're making) was Apple. And they definitely weren't interested in mak
66.
by GTP 3mo ago
And in the latter case, they could even not put any banner at all and still be compliant. The GDPR requires consent only for tracking.
67.
by GTP 3mo ago
While the EU is not perfect and surely needs improvement in many areas, it is still better than not having it. This is why you see a lot of pro-EU content: many people here (myself included) are of the opinion that the EU needs to be improv
68.
by GTP 3mo ago
The European Union is actually an union of treaties, with countries that sign some and not others. So here you would need to be more specific.
69.
by GTP 3mo ago
> oh yes, that's perfectly believable, the older man has seen right through the young man's soul and he knows everything the young man thinks and feels. He says exactly the opposite: that he can't know about the guy just b
70.
by GTP 3mo ago
I saw something similar on openRouter.
71.
by GTP 3mo ago
Nope, it reduces the issue even if it isn't solving it entirely. Without laws and law enforcement, anyone with bigger muscles than you could break your nose just because they feel you looked at them the wrong way.
72.
by GTP 3mo ago
My cinic take is, if the model is decent it would be hard to disprove their claim of it being Mythos-like, since now Mythos is unavailable.
73.
by GTP 3mo ago
No idea.
74.
by GTP 3mo ago
As you're basically saying, the world isn't black or white. There's also a category of people that needs an incentive to behave. Also, without any laws, it would be problematic to punish "the bad guys". At that poin
75.
by GTP 3mo ago
Then, don't rush and take a few minutes to set up a virtual machine.
76.
by GTP 3mo ago
Security through obscurity can make something a bit more secure in practice by annoying an attacker IF AND ONLY IF you're not relying on the hidden information remaining secret in order to the system remaining secure. E.g., if you&#x27
77.
by GTP 3mo ago
I don't see the difference. > OSS only needs someone to have a strong LLM to check for bugs. The same applies to propietary, closed-source code. It being closed-source means that the source isn't generally available, but the ex
78.
by GTP 3mo ago
Vulns are a subset of bugs. What the above commenter is saying, is that some bugs don't belong to this category.
79.
by GTP 3mo ago
Well, it's a joke because the problem becomes apparent after you think a bit about it. The exact same reasonig can be applied to anything illegal, criminals are criminals because they don't respect the law, so you could try to say
80.
by GTP 3mo ago
While I agree that there are quite good reasons why digital computers won over their analog relatives, you're now making me think how we could exploit the analog nature of what you're describing for encryption. I have a gut feelin
81.
by GTP 3mo ago
Not giving a shit doesn't mean being enemies. I think the one who needs to spend some more time learning is you ;)
82.
by GTP 3mo ago
Some assume it was to try to slip under the radar and avoid being limited by the government as they did with Fable.
83.
by GTP 3mo ago
Still, with the same model being served by multiple providers, it is much less likely to disappear entirely, even if you would like to keep using a cloud provider. Worst-case scenario, you change providers. Or you use OpenRouter as a proxy.
84.
by GTP 3mo ago
Yes, many students and researchers resort to piracy.
85.
by GTP 3mo ago
Which would bring you nowhere. If they didn't change this at some point, I remember at the time everyone was staring to use ChatGPT that OpenAI wrote in their terms that the user is responsible for the model's output. If they can
86.
by GTP 4mo ago
Go tell HR that you don't give a shit about your coworkers ;)
87.
by GTP 4mo ago
> No, the safe alternatives end with _s. Could you please elaborate on this? Both `man strncpy_s` and `man strcpy_s` didn't return any manual page on my Linux system.
88.
by GTP 4mo ago
I always thought that srncpy was the safe alternative to strcpy. Now that I think of it, I'm unsure if the NUL terminator is counted into strncpy's size or not, which would be a likely source of errors. But, could someone explain
89.
by GTP 4mo ago
As I wrote in replies to other similar comments, this would be the case if this technology was presented as an opportunity for researchers to run more large-scale studies. This isn't however the case, it is instead presented as a shiny
90.
by GTP 4mo ago
> I think it could help the world a lot if we had something like this to improve our understanding of more outlier cases Was this presented as an opportunity for researchers to be able to run more large scale studies involving full scans

More ›