GTP

39 ms·

451.
by GTP 2y ago
I don't have knowledge of how the message exchange went. But if it was Ulbricht to contact the supposed hitman in the first place, then you're right that there isn't much to discuss about. Policeman in disguise or not, it is
452.
by GTP 2y ago
> You missed that the "victims" did not exist and were invented (and Ulbricht's defense could have claimed that he was aware of that, and it would only need one juror to find that credible). But now we're playing lega
453.
by GTP 2y ago
Drugs weren't the only items sold there, there were also weapons. If you illegally sell weapons in a country where it is already much easier to legally get a weapon than most other countries, you can be sure that those weapons aren&#
454.
by GTP 2y ago
But now, let's get back to the case in point. Who threw morality out of the window, Ross Ulbricht or the state?
455.
by GTP 2y ago
In my opinion, yes.
456.
by GTP 2y ago
Where do you hit the decidability problem? Has it to do with not knowing if a new write is going to happen soon?
457.
by GTP 2y ago
Thank you, I get it now. The reason why I focused on that specific example, is because it is used in the blog post as proof that DKIM is being actively used to prove that someone actually sent an email.
458.
by GTP 2y ago
Sorry, I'm missing what you're trying to say here, maybe that a politician would be more careful about which message system he's using? I don't think that's necessarily the case. Anyway, to further add to my point,
459.
by GTP 2y ago
I think here is where the problem isn't purely a technical one anymore. You're right that, from a legal perspective, there is a difference as the burden of proof would now be on someone else. But, if this actually matters or not,
460.
by GTP 2y ago
> You don't need a conversation to cause havoc. Sure, but my point was different: let's say one of your teacher answered the spoofed email from the principal, you wouldn't be able to (properly) answer that email since you
461.
by GTP 2y ago
> They didn't change their password, so it wasn't really stolen You change your password only after you realize it got stolen. If you didn't realize it, then it makes sense you didn't change it. And, depending on the
462.
by GTP 2y ago
But you need to convince someone that someone targeted you and used the published key to forge an email. Where is the difference?
463.
by GTP 2y ago
Yes, I've now read it and it answered those questions. But it also stumbled upon an easier possible solution without realizing it: if you wish to pretend you didn't send some emails, you can still claim that someone stole your pas
464.
by GTP 2y ago
Yes, but the GET itself isn't changing any state. The state changes only after clicking on the button. This is OP's point.
465.
by GTP 2y ago
Isn't deniability at odds with DKIM's goal? What would be the point of setting DKIM then? Sure, it helps with spam scores. But most companies rely on a major email provider to send emails, so maybe they wouldn't have delivera
466.
Quantum teleportation can survive through busy internet cables(newscientist.com)
2 points by GTP 2y ago|0 comments
467.
by GTP 2y ago
Based on that page, they're dropping the REPL in favor of notebooks, but their're not dropping scripts. They are dropping some script-related functionality to focus on others.
468.
by GTP 2y ago
Interesting, the different way we use mochas can explain why you have stories about explosions: our way is definitely putting less stress on mochas, which end up lasting for decades without the need to be replaced. We use coffee that is spe
469.
by GTP 2y ago
> seem to have missed the party where they told us that "coding is not a means to an end" What is it for you then? My role isn't software engineer, but with a background in computer engineering, I see programming as a tool
470.
by GTP 2y ago
This is unexpected to me: I would have assumed that, even if you did something wrong, the valve would have prevented an explosion. I can understand a single valve going bad, but if this happened to many of your friends there might be someth
471.
by GTP 2y ago
Minor nitpick here, but it's a fact I found interesting when I heard about it. The water inside a Moka doesn't boil, you can indeed observe that the water coming out from the top isn't boiling. What happens is that the air th
472.
by GTP 2y ago
Minor nitpick here, but it's a fact I found interesting when I heard about it. The water inside a Moka doesn't boil, you can indeed observe that the water coming out from the top isn't boiling. What happens is that the air th
473.
by GTP 2y ago
Source? I'm from Italy, where everybody's using them, but never heard of a single one exploding. Maybe you can find an isolated case, but I'm confident it's extremely rare. There's a safety valve to release pressure
474.
by GTP 2y ago
If it's an entry for the IOCCC, yes ;)
475.
by GTP 2y ago
But op's point was about people talking about tiny LLMs failing to consider the amount of parameters used. This has nothing to do with the ability of autonomously collecting the training data.
476.
by GTP 2y ago
> Could this "data collection" code not potentially be put into a few thousand lines also? This would mean hardcoding a model of the world. Which maybe, with the help of some breakthrough from physics, would be possibe (but I t
477.
by GTP 2y ago
I listened to that podcast at the time. I remeber being surprised about one thing in particular. He was talking about predictions of when the first people will land on Mars. He said that we tend to underestimate many of the challenges invol
478.
by GTP 2y ago
The announcement has links, maybe they will add those to the homepage later.
479.
by GTP 2y ago
> physics will somehow magically forbid us from scaling up quantum computers Not magically >with predictable error rates etc This isn't my field of expertise, but my understanding is that this is precisely the issue: these predic
480.
by GTP 2y ago
I see a fundamental issue issue from systems theory here, but do note that I'm by no means an expert at that, just had a bachelor course covering it together with control theory. The issue is that you would train a model on historical

More ›