GPerson

14 ms·

1. 391.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   So you’re not buying the idea that with increased productivity those tools will quickly follow?
2. 392.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   Have you tried claude code? I despise AI to my bones but even I can’t say claude code is not impressive. If any anthropic reps read this, I think you guys, while probably better than open AI and meta, possibly Google, are delusional and are
3. 393.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   Reddit is partially owned by Sam Altman and they have deals with llm companies to sell the data. The content has been and will continue to be grabbed by everyone who can pay.
4. 394.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   This crowd would sooner believe silicon hardware (an arbitrary human invention from the 50s-60s) will have the physical properties required for consciousness than accept that they participate in torturing literally a hundred billion conscio
5. 395.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   My principled stance is that all known physical processes depend on particular physical processes and consciousness should be no different. What is yours?
6. 396.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   Consciousness is a physical process and like all physical processes depends on particular material interactions.
7. 397.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   I’m actually a vegan because I believe cows have consciousness. I believe consciousness is the only trait worth considering when applying morality questions. Arbitrary hardware is conscious.
8. 398.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   Would it crash if AI advances in a way which makes massive compute unnecessary? That’s an interesting possibility I wonder about.
9. 399.▲
   by GPerson 1y ago

   AGI will behave as if it were sentient but will not have consciousness. I believe in that to an equal amount that I believe solipsism is wrong. There is therefore no morality question in “enslaving” AGI. It doesn’t even make sense.
10. 400.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    Kinda curious on what jblow would say about this.
11. 401.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    Hope this happens to Altman’s data centers.
12. 402.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    I’m surprised you can detect that TikTok but AI is societally terrible but are still optimistic about AI. Why is that? As a technical point, AI can already be used on TikTok, and every other platform, so whatever societal terror is coming f
13. 403.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    I’m looking forward to the day when magical thinking such as this gets grounded again. That is when the real work will start anew.
14. 404.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    Fast / slow mode breaks “Space Invader” by the way.
15. 405.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    Can you say what parts Claude was used for to speed this up?
16. 406.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    Seems like there are potential privacy issues involved in sharing important emails with these companies, especially if you are sharing what the other person sent as well.
17. 407.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    5 years is barely a beginner in lots of fields.
18. 408.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    I think the article sets up a pretty silly and false dichotomy between goals and constraints. You’re not doing anything without planning, and you’re not doing anything with only planning. Anyways, the following part does resonate with me. “
19. 409.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    What are some ethical ways to oppose this? I’ll continue to make clear that at least one voice out here opposes AI in all forms.
20. 410.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    Well thanks for the advice, but no, you are incorrect.
21. 411.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    The main argument the AI defenders use nowadays to promote the development of this clearly harmful technology is that “if we don’t make the thing that almost certainly harms all humanity then China will!” This is just Mutually Assured Destr
22. 412.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    AI is clearly a net negative to humanity in its current form, and almost certainly all future forms. The fact that you refer to an actual human being as “some artist” betrays the absolute disdain you hold for humanity and in my opinion shou
23. 413.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    I’m in complete support of anything that will kill the ‘AI’ industry.
24. 414.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    This sounds terrible and I will spend my life opposing this.
25. 415.▲
    by GPerson 1y ago

    Everything about AI really is fraudulent.
26. 416.▲
    by GPerson 2y ago

    Did you ethically acquire permission to train on the data set?
27. 417.▲
    by GPerson 2y ago

    If you have an undergraduate’s understanding of calculus and linear algebra, you’re as or more advanced than the legion of ML PhD candidates I see graduating all the time. A field like that is running on hype, and has no quality control at
28. 418.▲
    by GPerson 2y ago

    I respect those people quite a lot. A lot more than I respect the parasites and frauds filling out the machine learning department.
29. 419.▲
    by GPerson 2y ago

    I’m not talking about compensation. I’m talking about a reason to live at all.
30. 420.▲
    by GPerson 2y ago

    Since you make no argument to justify your unfounded claim, I’ll simply respond by informing you that these (obviously) are not remotely similar. To claim they are indicates some kind of deep disrespect for your fellow human beings. You cou