Freedom2

43 ms·

1. 691.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   Got any examples?
2. 692.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   Brandon Sanderson has a decent quote from Secret Project #1, that makes me think a bit. > That is one of the great mistakes people make: assuming that someone who does menial work does not like thinking. Physical labor is great for the m
3. 693.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   This seems like a pretty serious crime. I can't imagine anyone higher than an officer keeping classified documents, or even contesting that they have any or if they are classified at all!
4. 694.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   I disagree, and agree with jallen. If nothing else, this is fraud! A voting ring like this has to be dismantled immediately, or else there will be significant ramifications, which im sure GP and expand on.
5. 695.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   Interestingly, conservatives don't think it's a health risk at all, actually. [1] I'm not entirely sure what to believe, as my I haven't kept up to date with what my fellow HNers are preaching. 1: https://www.
6. 696.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   So they say. As we've learnt over the years, what can we truly trust? How can we verify that these promises are kept? I read a good HN comment before, which could be inspiration for a comic or TV series: "Who watches the watchers?
7. 697.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   Anchoring can also be used in other applications than just raising API costs - GP should revisit how they unequivocally declare their statements.
8. 698.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   Yep, it's pretty alarming that a developer would toss away async when threading isn't a fit for all situations - what happened to the right person tool for the job? As a professional, I 'hate' some things too, but I&#x27
9. 699.▲
   by Freedom2 3y ago

   But you can still do it, right?
10. 700.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    > don’t want to keep reading the same rehashed advice Rehashed, sometimes outdated, advice is what you'll often find here, though.
11. 701.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    I'd be careful - some users on this forum don't like it when others expend their energy to makes sure that headlines are accurate.
12. 702.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    Then why did you specifically claim that you asked ChatGPT? These distinctions, while small, are important. Not really the type of mistake to make for a tech-savvy forum.
13. 703.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    What recent reports have there been? It's arguable that report from 2015 might not be the best source. Now that proper American values are making their way into libraries, Christianity should boom, wouldn't you agree?
14. 704.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    What is KISS? Apologies, I'm unfamiliar with some acronyms.
15. 705.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    Just trying to make sure our community remains the greatest online tech forum in the world :)
16. 706.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    Correction: it's just Max now, not HBO Max. Moderators, can we look at fixing up the title here so it's more accurate?
17. 707.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    Agreed. There's a lot of claims that are unsubstantiated as well as full of anecodes. It's hard to discern how this can lead to 'curious' discussion.
18. 708.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    One thing great about HN is that the moderation team makes it impossible for the discussion to be infiltrated!
19. 709.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    The article reports (emphasis mine): > A _new_ study Yet this study appears to be from 2020. Is this the correct study?
20. 710.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    That's interesting. Unlike Reddit, maintaining an article's actual title isn't a priority on this site, and moderation is only too happy to change it at their whims. I'm surprised that the spelling wasn't corrected
21. 711.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    Truly a capital joke, haha! Cheerio!
22. 712.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    I think what's most important is that "curious" discussion was generated out of your comment! Despite what you may think, I believe the discussion spawned out of it was a resounding success.
23. 713.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    GP probably thinks it's important that anti-mask, anti-vaccine, pro-violence rhetoric makes its way to the top of the replies in the name of "free speech".
24. 714.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    What insurance did you have?
25. 715.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    IME, only ones negative to the US get moderated away. Users are free to spray gun against other countries all they like, under the guise of "curious" discussion.
26. 716.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    I don't have a source handy, I can find one later if you desire. During Melbourne's lockdowns there was consistent criticism from US based commenters about the lack of freedoms in Australia. edit: https://news.ycombinat
27. 717.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    Define contact. I talk to my coworkers regularly, I am able to visit and support my local community businesses where I live (rather than a large, faceless city), I am able to socialize with my local community as well. I would avoid extrapol
28. 718.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    CEOs are definitely something we should reconsider in this day and age. There's something about the kind of fiefdom that they command that I don't really know the term for it - immoral? Unnatural?
29. 719.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    Working in a separate place than your home is a recent concept - humanity has worked from home far longer than in offices or workplaces. Consider farming, or craftspeople working their trade, as well as nomadic cultures. In what way is WFH
30. 720.▲
    by Freedom2 3y ago

    What's more important than all those factors is if it generates "curious" discussion. Reading through the comments, I indeed say it does!