Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Frannky
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Frannky
3mo ago
Zed with multiple conversations open. Each conversation is a problem to solve. The agent is a way to read code and logs rapidly to find what's causing the problem. The feedback loop to the product is much faster. I constantly check wha
32.
▲
by
Frannky
3mo ago
I can use it but I'm not. I used it before the ban, it's better but the speed at which tokens are burned is not justified. And this makes me happy because it means I am ok with current capabilities that will soon be matched by ope
33.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
Hmm, I have access to A100s and a GB10, but if I use the models hosted there to code, I waste a lot of time waiting for answers and correcting errors. The amount of work I get done thanks to the quality and speed of frontier hosted models l
34.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
This is my opinion too. Even if you buy hardware like a cluster of 8xGB10s or 4 A100s, they'll still be slow and a little dumber than what you're used to. We need to wait a little for better hardware. Lots of companies are pushing
35.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
There is a push from multiple directions at the same time: - new AI desktops with GB10s. They are relatively cheap and you can cluster them and load 1TB of VRAM - Nvidia, amd, intel, Cerebras etc pushing new hardware - oss models getting cr
36.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
So they will be able to know how each person thinks, block capabilities they want to block, boycott what they want to boycott, and influence perspective on reality. Fortunately they are Anthropic and so as the name tells, they will care abo
37.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
This is so cool and looks so fun. I want to play with robots. I just play with software :( I wanted to build something making bows automatically and damn, pretty complex and expensive to buy the parts. I was like, I can probably just buy a
38.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
I read some cool posts of people trying MiniMax 3 on 4x GB10. I wonder if we are almost there that with 10k we can have Opus 4.6 level at home. I feel tweaking the harnesses and a few more versions from oss models and some new hardware from
39.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
Same
40.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
Someone knows how to get the subscription money back?
41.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
The model is very good. I was using 4.6, avoided 4.7 and 4.8, but this one is different. It follows my claude.md. I don't have to keep reminding it of things. I won't pay 10x via API though. In general, I'm happy with their p
42.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
The model is better than 4.6. I don't like 4.7 and 4.8. The forced switch to token usage is not acceptable for me. I feel there's room to optimize harnesses and small models for dumb stuff and best models only for difficult things
43.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
I tried this model it was pretty bad at coding. Maybe it was me. 1k tokens/sec pretty cool tho. Deepseek V4 pro is better. I wonder tweak pi + deepseek pro v4+ 1k tokens/sec if would actually be better than Claude code
44.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
Ready later this year... What I want from the phone are low-level APIs exposed to an agent I can talk/type to without lag. I wonder how long it will take or if a new AI phone will come before these features. I would love Siri working b
45.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
pokeemerald.wasm.RunAnimScriptCommand@ https://pokeemerald.com/web/app.js line 723 > WebAssembly.compile:wasm-function[1318]:0x18836f pokeemerald.wasm.OpponentDoMoveAnimation@ https://pokeemerald.com/w
46.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
Fun and pleasant. Speed up removes the chore feeling. I get bugs that make me loose the progress :(
47.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
It's interesting that there are almost no comments on this. This feels like some of the most exciting and impactful fields of the next years. I worked with a cracked researcher that was generating molecules a couple of years ago. She s
48.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
If you are ambitious and want to work hard and build and solve problems, it's just a way better reality. That optimistic outlook, and the idea that you can do it, is so freeing and fun if you like to build and solve problems. I felt th
49.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
I started using chatgpt for functions and checking, then for single file changes and checking, now for multiple changes and checking. I am at a point where the only changes I correct are architectural. So it may start to become smarter to l
50.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
Yeah, the point was mostly that you can offload a lot of stuff to AI + code — stuff that before you would have needed people for. Obviously, it becomes better to have local models running on your own hardware — that will be best. I don'
51.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
Thanks for sharing this. This is the same as what I am thinking. I still see the gravitational pull of doing what seems like the supposed thing to do, but it makes sense to do what the model in our mind suggests makes the most sense, especi
52.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
I started a new company with my cofounder 6 months ago. We focused on what people wanted, built a manual solution then automated it. We have 60% margins and a system ready to scale. We are thinking of avoiding investments. I am not sure if
53.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
Seeing DeepSeek reasoning tokens generating faster than I could read. It was the first time I realized it could "think" way faster than us, and all the relative consequences. I was already leveraging the tool, but at that point re
54.
▲
by
Frannky
4mo ago
What are the best alternatives for template + text rendering? I need Canva-level templating ability with the system matching font dimensions, positions, and the image without background. I ended up creating an algo using color variance and
55.
▲
by
Frannky
5mo ago
I use 4.6, because 4.7 is super lazy, deflects responsibility, and assumes it is good and I am bad, and avoids checking reality. It looks like it's trained on lazy humans instead of good engineers. Should I try 4.8? I am happy with 4.6
56.
▲
by
Frannky
5mo ago
One big difference I see in how minds work is their ability to model. A few people I know focus on end-to-end model thinking — trying to maximize against some functions. The rest of them seem to avoid thinking outside a small info bubble&#x
57.
▲
by
Frannky
5mo ago
I hope they can figure out a cheaper and less bulky option. It's pretty cool to unlock the ability to have a screen and apps popping up in the real space without the constraint of a screen. I would not pay all that money to have someth
58.
▲
by
Frannky
5mo ago
I wonder how much of this reasoning will make sense in the future. How much of the way you are thinking is based on the past curves reality worked before? Are you taking into account exponential acceleration? I guess abundance will flow in
59.
▲
by
Frannky
5mo ago
What would be helpful is also harness + models. I realized I can get Pi Dev and DeepSeek Pro to do the same work as Claude Code + Opus 4.7. I was skeptical at first, but I tried using that and then asked Claude if the changes were okay, and
60.
▲
by
Frannky
5mo ago
For those using it instead of the other options, I am curious why? Is it better along some dimension? Is it cheaper? Is it faster?
More ›