Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Flimm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
66 ms
·
721.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Please define what you mean by code point and code unit.
722.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Thank you for posting this. My initial reaction was like soora's, and it's good to be reminded that not everyone shares my experience and assumptions.
723.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
There isn't going to be an Edge, but there could well be other models of phones for Ubuntu.
724.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
I'm at a Perl conference right now with hundreds of other attendees. Perl definitely is alive.
725.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
If you have to post minor version updates, link to the changelog, not the downloads page.
726.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
No, it's not perfectly reasonable.
727.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
This is exactly the kind of comment I wish I could downvote: "You're presenting facts, {position X} people don't like that." "I find it funny how {position X} people come up with such amount of unproven facts, such
728.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
In what way did cheese1756 badmouth Reddit?
729.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
If you do choose to license your code under such a license, it would not be considered open source (according to the OSI) or free software (according to the FSF). Here's the relevant part of the Open Source Definition: > The license
730.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
It's not legally possible to dedicate your project to the public domain in many jurisdictions. That's why CC0 exists: http://creativecommons.org/about/cc0
731.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
No, the article does not mention the anti-tivoization clause. The AGPL requires you to share the source code with users, even when the software is hosted on your machines. That's what differentiates AGPL from GPLv3.
732.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Just in case that's not clear, when people capitalise "Free Software", they're generally referring to the definition used by the Free Software Foundation.
733.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Consider using Mozilla Persona to handle authentication. It's easier to implement that rolling your own username/password solution (although I see you've already done that), and it's decentralised unlike using Google credentials.
734.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
It failed here, but without an error message. I can only see the first frame.
735.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
All I can see is a photo with the caption "Make brilliant collages with your pictures. Any pictures from Facebook, ? and Instagram". Clicking everywhere does nothing, scrolling up or down does not reveal anything. I'm using Firefox on a wid
736.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Since copyright. What on earth would make you think that subtitles are exempt from copyright? Song lyrics are copyrighted, screenplays are copyright, so are subtitles.
737.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
It's "lose weight", not "loose weight". Sorry to nitpick.
738.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Why are you getting the subtitles from? Are they good quality? And have you licensed the subtitles legally?
739.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
How is he literally larger than life?
740.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
> It turns out that the change doesn’t affect most personal Profiles. Instead, it’s only applicable to Pages — such as the one for TIME — and for individuals with more than 10,000 followers, who Facebook thinks are likely have active c
741.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Commercial software and open source software are intersecting sets.
742.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Ah, I did not notice the only word. It seems like a pointless rule to me.
743.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
I really like this idea. I've always wondered whether I should delete my Facebook account, but I never put the effort into weighing up the consequences. I might just do this for the thrill of it. If I survive I get an interesting status, if
744.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
By users, do you mean Python 3 programmers?
745.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Not true. Take this string: d͊ It is composed of two code points: U+0064 and U+034A. The second code point is a combining character. The two code points together form one glyph. The term "character" is confusing because people use different
746.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
In Python 3, there is a clear distinction between string objects and bytes objects. String objects are a sequence of Unicode code points, and bytes objects are a sequence of 0-255 byte values. > Character is a context in which we read i
747.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Yes. It's much better to think of strings as a sequence of Unicode code points.
748.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Even the Pirate Party (at least the UK one) only wants to reduce copyright length, not abolish it.
749.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
A not very well publicised guideline is that the codenames are only supposed to be used before release, and the version number after release. If you go to ubuntu.com they consistently use the version number, not the codename.
750.
▲
by
Flimm
13y ago
Great article, thanks.
More ›