FailMore

8 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   Thanks + thanks for the heads up. I will see what happens. It's a domain-name war out there!
2. 122.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   I like the folder opening and the idea to integrate Claude is very interesting. I’m also curious to know how you did the document rendering. It looks very good. This problem has risen to the top of many people’s minds at this moment (includ
3. 123.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   Thanks. The question has made me wonder about the value of some sort of real time verification service.
4. 124.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   Thanks for the kind words re the analytics! You are right re privacy. It is possible to go from url hash -> parse -> server (that’s not what SDocs does to be clear). I’ve been thinking about how to prove our privacy mechanism. The ide
5. 125.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   Really nice implementation by the way. Re URL length: Yes... I have a feeling it could become an issue. I was wondering if a browser extension might give users the ability to have shorter urls without losing privacy... but haven't look
6. 126.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   TYVM. Yeah, I am curious to explore moving into other file formats like CSVs.
7. 127.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   Thanks. Re tokens reduction: not that I’m aware of. Would you mind explaining how it might? That could be a cool feature to add
8. 128.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   Thanks! One potential use case I have for it is being able to make "branded" markdown if you need to share something with a client/public facing.
9. 129.▲
   by FailMore 6mo ago

   Ish, but the cap is the length of url that the browser can handle. For desktop chrome it's 2MB, but for mobile Safari its 80KB. The compression algo SDocs uses reduces the size of your markdown file by ~10x, so 80KB is still ~800KB of
10. 130.▲
    Show HN: SDocs – A CLI and webapp for private Markdown reading and sharing(sdocs.dev)

    1 points by FailMore 6mo ago|0 comments
11. 131.▲
    Show HN: SmallDocs – Markdown without the frustrations

    92 points by FailMore 6mo ago|50 comments
12. 132.▲
    by FailMore 6mo ago

    I like it too. Nice idea
13. 133.▲
    by FailMore 7mo ago

    Good fun thanks! Found a cute cat in Buenos Aires. It seems you have quite a lot of activity already, is that all from HN in the last two hours or from something else before this?
14. 134.▲
    by FailMore 7mo ago

    Any ideas how to solve the agent's don't have total common sense problem? I have found when using agents to verify agents, that the agent might observe something that a human would immediately find off-putting and obviously wrong
15. 135.▲
    by FailMore 7mo ago

    Looks interesting, thanks. Have you learnt anything from looking at the API calls?
16. 136.▲
    Surge in giant sinkholes threatens Turkey's farmers(theguardian.com)

    11 points by FailMore 7mo ago|0 comments
17. 137.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    That's only visible when it's not your personal conversation (you can't interact with someone else's). In a way it's designed to be distracting so you know how to start your own conversation.
18. 138.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    The building of the visualiser was less interesting to me than the result and your conclusion. I agree that finding new ways to ingest the structure and logic of software would be very useful, and I like your solution. Is there a way to tes
19. 139.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Yeah I actually started there. Https://dev.rebrain.gg has the old version up. You upload a source and it generates questions from it. However when showing it to friends I found that the barrier to usage was too high as most people
20. 140.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Yes, at the moment it's an issue of cost. I can't use the best models because it is not affordable. Hopefully as performance improves over the years this will become less of an issue. Maybe I can build in a websearch to verify inf
21. 141.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Yeah, I like your idea. Will implement
22. 142.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Hey, thank you so much for the detailed feedback. Re the more focused feedback, I totally agree re the questioning styles. In the prompt I ask for it to not do so many multiple choice questions, but I think it is addicted/the conversat
23. 143.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    You have to create a conversation for yourself. Currently you can't interact with other people's conversations. Sorry this wasn't clear enough!
24. 144.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    No passwords FYI - I hate them too. Google sign in or "magic link". I know not everyone likes them, but trying to keep friction as low as possible
25. 145.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Hey, I appreciate your views (both positive and negative). There actually is a bit of a back story behind it all. I spent a month working on a different version of rebrain, (still available here: https://dev.rebrain.gg ). After p
26. 146.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Do you have any info on areas it was broken?
27. 147.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Thanks very much for the feedback. If you have any ideas of how to communicate the retention mechanisms please let me know. If you want to discuss further, please leave feedback on the site (you can do this if you're signed in) and men
28. 148.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    You are right, I'll take out some of the worst colours
29. 149.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Thanks for the interesting idea
30. 150.▲
    by FailMore 8mo ago

    Haha, thanks for the further education!