FDSGSG

64 ms·

721.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Tor browser and the email provider of your choice. I find that cock.li makes it particularly easy to create new accounts and does not restrict Tor use.
722.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
It would be much more honest to just use "unlawful rendition" as opposed to the terminology coined by the US government in order to make their illegal actions seem more palatable.
723.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>Oh, this won't be DRM-bound like half of what it does? If you're sure and not just guessing, good. Not any more so than in similarly priced German cars. >Next up, can you order parts without this procedure yet? Sourcing par
724.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>The screen is attached to a computer that is able to prevent the car from turning on Ok? That computer isn't particularly adversarial. Presumably if you're capable of fixing this car yourself the computers will present you wit
725.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
I don't think there was ever a civil suit filed against Swartz. As far as I remember and according to the timeline on wikipedia this seems to have been a criminal case from the very beginning. And in any case I don't think this
726.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>mudge Preettty sure that was just a misguided welfare check incorrectly described as a "swatting". See context: https://twitter.com/dotMudge/status/1211043309973622784 Odds are someone was worried ab
727.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
> To me, the scariest part of the article is the last image showing the Tesla screen: "Schedule an appointment on your Tesla Mobile App". >No ability to take it somewhere else, no ability to diagnose and attempt a fix yourse
728.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>Which can also verify salary...urgh. This seems so vulnerable to data entry mistakes that such data might just be completely useless. What happens when stated salary doesn't match salary verifier numbers? Do you just not hire that
729.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
> DoJ was getting very trigger-happy in turning civil cases criminal Do you happen to have a single example of this?
730.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>Sony got everything they asked for before the case was settled Not much happened before the settlement, the parties settled very quickly after Hotz's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction failed. The TRO sucked, but wasn'
731.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
The way you repeatedly suggest that VC was threatening others is bordering on defamatory.
732.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>(multiple) people believed he was threatening others Do you have any evidence to support this claim? Unless you're implying that his eviction in itself is evidence, which sounds pretty insane to me.
733.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>He was told in advance he wasn't welcome there This is inaccurate.
734.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
> If people were reasonably convinced that he was threatening others You're the first person to suggest that he was threatening others.
735.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Vincent was kicked out because some congress folks believe that he is a fascist.
736.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>But this is just a rant by a guy who registers distasteful domains, seemingly to provoke actions like the one "recorded" here. This is CCC we're talking about, your weird insinuation re: domain names doesn't really m
737.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
> obviously a charming fellow Yes, Vincent is a very nice guy. E: I wonder if any of the people downvoting me have actually interacted with Vincent.
738.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Why?
739.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Do you genuinely believe this? If yes, would you care to expand further on this? I'm utterly fascinated and would love to hear more background on what leads you to believe that this comparison is apt.
740.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Damn, the Vim developers seem to be a particularly unpleasant group of people.
741.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Saudis and many OGUsers kids.
742.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>inherently more secure What now?
743.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
They're less rare because they've almost completely replaced the attacks I described as "very unlikely". In 2019 it's extremely rare that anyone gets owned just by clicking a link , we've moved very far from t
744.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
When was the last time you saw email spam linking to a browser driveby exploit?
745.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
I'm sorry, I can't seem to find any references to driveby exploits in that report. I see many mentions of malicious office documents with downloader macros and similar attacks that certainly happen regularly today. I do not see an
746.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>Nah, in reality someone probably clicked a link in a malicious email that launched a backdoor on their computer. The likelihood of that approaches 100% on untrained users. In 2019 this is actually very unlikely. Driveby exploits have be
747.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
So what? The question would be "Why is insider trading actually bad in this specific instance?" not "Is insider trading actually a crime?" "Insider trading creates perverse incentives" would not inherently mean
748.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
I understand that this looks unfair, but why is this actually bad?
749.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Should there be? This seems more like a civil matter.
750.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
So why should ICANN hold any such control?

More ›