Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
EvilEy3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
211.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
No, right now the only way to target all platforms is JavaScript. Flutter's desktop and web support is a sad joke, and even on mobile it doesn't feel native even on Android.
212.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Non-native look and non-native toolkit is two different things. You don't need to look native to support accessibility, built-in i18n and L10n, to behave like other native looking applications. But you certainly need to be native to no
213.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> and server side. Cool story.
214.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> HTML5 (which is now called Progressive Web Apps / PWA) Since when HTML5 became PWA?
215.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Android is infinitely better than anything you can come up with Linux OS on mobile. It is much easier to "fix" Android's "issues".
216.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Yep, apologies to OP. I thought I was replying to different comment.
217.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
I don't see how any of this happens all the time. If I were to maximize terminal and IDE/Browser I won't see those things either.
218.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Original question was regarding UI. What's wrong with W10 UI?
219.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Because you're throwing jabs at Android while literally every other OS in existence behaves the same way regarding network access.
220.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Google and Samsung offer at least 4 years of support. This number will increase in the future as they decouple stuff from core OS.
221.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
There's either something really wrong with your OnePlus or your eyes, if it is slow.
222.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Why?
223.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> just for 0.01% of users Who will develop it, why and most importantly what will it provide compared to alternatives?
224.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> We have GNOME 40 now which is beautiful. Don't know about that, chief. Looks like a same old Gnome.
225.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> It is full of distractions Define distraction in terms of computing first.
226.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> plenty of us Which is a soooo tiny minority that it won't even show up on charts. > It's absolutely impossible to discover but I think it involves a "reverse three finger pinch." That's a shitty UX, not UI.
227.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
It is sarcastic. Person who advocates for Firefox on Android doesn't even know that it is already there.
228.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Having algorithmic knowledge for a job is like having a common sense. You wouldn't hire someone who can't think, would you?
229.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> What good reasons are there to still go native today? Providing native experience instead of wrapped website.
230.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
If only there was a Firefox for Android.
231.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> Android isn’t the same, but even then nobody knowingly wants to run Android. What are you smoking? Android is the most popular OS in the world. It has millions of applications in PlayStore and outside of it. It has millions of develope
232.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
They're barely working on desktop and you want to bring them to phones?
233.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Even if we're referring to this case. What right do you think you have to use company name to push your agenda? Even if you're morally right about the matter, you're morally wrong to use company entity to push your opinion. I
234.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Politics and religion comes up most of the times, never heard people discussing sex.
235.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Good stuff.
236.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
A glimmer of hope. Thank you for writing this. Feels like most of the companies gone insane, where vocal minority controls everything.
237.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
You missed the part where you lose "free" money when you start working, genius.
238.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Nobody obliged to give you work. They gave you a task and you couldn't solve it, fair and square. I can stretch your logic even further that giving BE task to FE person is a discrimination because they don't have luxury to work on
239.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> This process fails to consider candidates that would be good fits. Not to dismiss your opinion, but where are the proofs?
240.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Whatever lets you sleep at night.
More ›