Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Eufrat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Eufrat
6mo ago
Can someone explain why everything is being marketed in terms of power consumption?
92.
▲
by
Eufrat
6mo ago
I thought the sales pitch of all of this is that the AI was supposed to relieve people from having to do a bunch of annoying bootstrap coding and to do it in a way that we could extended easily. I have a subscription to Claude Code and desp
93.
▲
by
Eufrat
6mo ago
No, it is isn’t and saying it is here by using vague goalposts does not make AGI show up. I will agree we have been unable to define what it is, but we can’t even figure out why humans have consciousness right now.
94.
▲
by
Eufrat
6mo ago
It really feels like OpenAI simply acquires anything AI adjacent that is trendy or allows financial analysts to argue that we just don’t understand Sam Altman’s 39D chess strategy.
95.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
What did we win?
96.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
Liaw is family and it is not possible for a company like this to separate family from company interests. He is clearly unwilling to change, so, Super Micro is just going to die a painful death.
97.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
It sounds like this is along the lines of Firecrawl is trying to do? Or what Plaid has done for banking? > I think, the net benefit would be in the billions. I think, you must forgive people if they are somewhat hostile, if not sick and
98.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
They seemed open to giving it a try if they were actively involved in the experiment. Instead, it feels like a lot of people don’t really understand how Wikipedia is managed and thought that they could use it as a freeform place to get cred
99.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
The term artificial intelligence has always been just a buzzword designed to sell whatever it needed to. IMHO, it has no meaningful value outside of a good marketing term. John McCarthy is usually the person who is given credit for coming u
100.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
I think it is. The launch announcement explicitly says the same thing, “Meta is our lead partner and customer”.
101.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
> I'm (mildly) excited by LLMs because I love a new shiny tool that does appear to have quite some utility. I really think a lot of folks were conned by a smooth operator and a polished demo, so now everyone has to suffer though hav
102.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
They don’t have to use the tech, except maybe superficially. They are either being explicitly mislead by salespeople or like others have mentioned, it simply is a vehicle to confirm their own biases or annoyance at having to pay peons. It’s
103.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
We’ll never know exactly what exactly transpired, but I think the existing evidence is clear that as President of Y Combinator he should not have been also as involved in OpenAI as he was. This is a conflict of interest and I think one a ve
104.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
Multiple people have attested that Sam Altman is extremely charming (especially in more casual, intimate settings) and talks very nobly about his goals, but his actual work is just…all kinds of awful. And I think that charm only goes so far
105.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
I suspect someone is literally asking the idiotic question if they can just replace our air traffic controllers with an AI.
106.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
People keep saying this and I agree Claude has gotten a lot better even in my own experience, but I think the value is questionable. What’s the point of adding features that are inscrutable? I have gotten Claude to make a feature and it mos
107.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
I find LLMs useful in regurgitating one-liners that I can’t be bothered to remember or things where even being flat out wrong is okay and you just do it yourself. For all the folks spending a lot of time and energy in setting up MCP servers
108.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
> Like, no, former Apple PM who learned about an interconnection queue from ChatGPT last week, you are not going to fix the grid, and even moreso you can't "just do X and ask forgiveness later", not in electricity. Just br
109.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
I don’t want to discount the hard work that went into this, but I think it is always important to recognize this is mostly not a representation of competence, but of means and access. I have never seen someone fortunate enough to get such o
110.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
Probably. The Clockwise folks were from a startup that was bought out by Salesforce before they left to do this. IMHO, the problem with Clockwise is that there was never a compelling product or a moat they could build with in the space. It
111.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
> Apparently you will get used to it over time, I'm still on the getting used to it phase after a couple months. I think this is one of the reasons VR is niche. You are not going to see mass adoption of a product where you need to g
112.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
There is always going to be some movement. It’s impossible for there not to be. Whether it is rendered in the VR environment or happening in real-life through small little motions, there’s a lot of little things that help to establish the m
113.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
Yes, my understanding (and I suspect the reason why the airflow experiment worked) is that a large part of the reason this happens is because of a mismatch between the output from the vestibular and visual systems. So, the automated defense
114.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
I think this title is a little misleading? Rather it seems like they are just asking for clarification and discussing more clarity from the existing policy.
115.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
> VR is so good and still in it's infancy. I believe 30% of the population cannot use VR in any way shape or form because your inner ear has decided the floor is the only place you can be.
116.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
> Also, I'm not blaming users for their shortcomings. I'm just saying they are not perfect but you can get different outcomes according to how you use them. I don’t question your sincerity. The problem is these arguments and fr
117.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
This is not a useful, constructive or meaningful statement. Attempting to claim the models are the future by perpetually arguing their limitations are because people are using the models wrong or that the argument has been invalidated becau
118.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
I mean, all of these behaviors: - Blatant insider trading - Angry people who were invested in an outcome These are just a few of the reasons why such prediction markets were not permitted in the first place. It’s just incredibly toxic and c
119.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
I think you and a lot of people have spent a lot of energy getting as much out of these models as you can and I think that’s great, but I agree that it’s not what they’re being sold as and there is plenty of space for people to treat these
120.
▲
by
Eufrat
7mo ago
I get the impression there’s a very strong bimodal experience of these tools and I don’t consider that an endorsement of their long-term viability as they are right now. For me, I am genuinely curious why this is. If the tool was so obvious
More ›