Espionage724

7 ms·

31.
by Espionage724 3y ago
I can listen to music on the radio, but it's a whole different issue when I pick specific songs to pirate for my own personal listening :p But that's not where the caring comes in; it's the tools I can use to pirate songs; he
32.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Google is correct. The site was hosting malicious content, the site was public-facing, and Google took steps to protect its users trying to visit a site that was hosting malicious content which is more than anyone else would do. What else c
33.
by Espionage724 3y ago
I guess technically Google flagged the site while the malicious files were still being hosted; it's not that they flagged the site when it wasn't hosting malicious content.
34.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Why do OUL and Rocky exist if not to compete with RHEL?
35.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Who is everyone? I imagine any serious business is paying for RHEL instead of an unheard of fork, and in my use if I wanted to change from Fedora Server I'd go to CentOS Stream, followed by RH with a free dev license. I'm getting
36.
by Espionage724 3y ago
For Intel, there's DVMT that can be set to different values; with setup_var I can change the memory allocation for Intel UHD 630 from 256MB to 1GB. I wonder if a BIOS modification could be done to go past the 1GB limit? It sounds like
37.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Uranium, the radioactive stuff? That sounds excellent to be using in glassware!
38.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Looks good to me! I'm covered by most of the exemptions with normal usage. I'm still salty about Tutanota deleting my (I guess) inactive account. I signed up to both it and ProtonMail around the same time, and also went inactive f
39.
by Espionage724 3y ago
If you're enterprise with more than 16 machines, you can and should probably be paying for RHEL. What I'm not understanding is why people need to use RHEL and would resort to free random forks of it, instead of just using CentOS S
40.
by Espionage724 3y ago
So you'd rather use some random fork of RHEL?
41.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Just a flat re-release of an old game on modern devices? That's cool I guess, but there's Quake II VR that's way more interesting :p
42.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Who wouldn't? Fools who fall into that kind of toxicity likely have money to throw at your products. You want people to buy your product as a for-profit company, right?
43.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Lol I'm sure that person is getting paid more than enough to not be thinking about that stuff
44.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Cruft is left around from caches and old program data all the time. A clean install handles that, and lets me verify my configs are still good and think about way to change them. Clean installs also let me do full-drive SSD trims. I do OS r
45.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Now I'm even more confused as to why RHEL's changes are this controversial :p 16 machines is more devices than I have in my house, and enterprise seems like they can just pay for RHEL. I'm also betting there's not some t
46.
by Espionage724 3y ago
lolwut? Unless something major changed, you're dropped to a terminal as soon as you boot the install image, and have to either have advanced knowledge on what to do from there, or have the wiki side-by-side on another device. And unles
47.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Heck no; I reinstalled distros multiple times a week while I was distro hopping and Arch got reinstalled once before I quickly realized it didn't offer anything to make that install process worthwhile. I use Fedora primarily because of
48.
by Espionage724 3y ago
I've heard too many horror-stories of major OS upgrades and even service packs back in XP and Vista days. New distro versions for me equals a clean state to make sure everything goes smoothly :p I have commands and notes that let me re
49.
by Espionage724 3y ago
It seems easier to just fix my system instead of trying to prevent breaking it :p I don't know what an accidental change is, but if I want to change something I'm going to change it and likely tear through immutability anyway. I c
50.
by Espionage724 3y ago
openSUSE Tumbleweed makes more sense for rolling imo and was even more up-to-date than Arch at times with major DE versions and kernels. And openSUSE like most other mainstream distros doesn't require an encyclopedia to install :p Fedo
51.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Are you sure? Things I read online say it's free, including https://developers.redhat.com/products/rhel/download As I understand, the only costs with RHEL include using it across a large number of machines in
52.
by Espionage724 3y ago
I found YaST to get in my way at times; I particularly remember YaST's Network panel hanging because I had StevenBlack's huge HOSTS file. I do like the network panel though for changing static IPs; I had to do some searching to tr
53.
by Espionage724 3y ago
AppArmor vs SELinux I've ran Ubuntu and openSUSE servers and aside from a profile issue with PHP and openSUSE, I don't know if AppArmor is even protecting anything. Everything just works and it makes me think AppArmor is only appl
54.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Why would anyone use a server OS that's a fork of another server OS, provided by a group of 3rd-parties with their own competing enterprise distros? I'm sure there's a reason for it with all the discussions, but if I want to
55.
by Espionage724 3y ago
What's the problem with that? I don't know the exact limitations, but for a personal home lab that seems fine. For companies, I imagine they could either pay proper for RHEL, use free CentOS Stream or Fedora, or some other server
56.
by Espionage724 3y ago
The fragment part comes from KDE nor GNOME coming close to the efficiency of DWM and Windows Explorer. DWM and Explorer have low-latency, good hardware-acceleration, and power efficiency down to a T. GNOME 44 isn't on-par. I haven&#x27
57.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Why would anyone use a server OS that's a fork of another server OS, provided by a group of 3rd-parties with their own competing enterprise distros? I'm sure there's a reason for it with all the discussions, but if I want to
58.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Lmao there's no winning with you people :p Don't worry, Wayback is capable of telling CNET where to go if they were really concerned. If anything they should be thankful for the newly-generated interest that a major company would
59.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Yeah I defend stuff that works :p AMD is what you get without telemetry; crap API support on Windows (they took their already mangled stack and Jay Wilson'd it May 2022), next to no innovation with AI, flopped OpenCL, and have to conce
60.
by Espionage724 3y ago
Yeah that kind of silly selfish behavior is exactly why NVIDIA buries the telemetry deep in their drivers and doesn't offer an option. Most people have no reason to limit or even be concerned with this. Intel is adding telemetry to imp

More ›