Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Epa095
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
What makes comaps better?
92.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
What usually happens is that that competitors then gets disappeared. Either by a happy ending (it gets bought up), or it gets squeezed out. Monopolies arise naturally unless we work hard to avoid them.
93.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
Progressive taxes hit wage earners, while its the owners who will reap the benefits of AI. We won't get a share of the fruits without solving how to properly tax wealth(in a world where money is power, and its trivial for rich people t
94.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
Is this not just a linguistic issue, where people say normal distributed but actually mean approximate or assumed normality? Its not like height is normally distributed (there is nobody 8 feet tall), but its not like the distribution bares
95.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
As I said above, I explain the cultural norms making it seen as acceptable. I am not trying to convince you, and I am certainly not interested in a bunch of random tangental discussions. Maybe the poor kid would rather not tell the trai
96.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
First, lets me clarrify that I am trying to explain how this practise is justified in Norway, I am not arguing for or against it. Some of the justification is pure cultural traits, which you can try to understand even if you dont agree with
97.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
Yeah, tail call elimination, is definitely doable. Python famously does not have it because "Language inventor Guido van Rossum contended that stack traces are altered by tail-call elimination making debugging harder, and preferred tha
98.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
I don't think there's anything like ratsit in Norway which would let you do this query anonymously.
99.
▲
by
Epa095
7mo ago
Because tax is not your bill from 'government Corp ', its your contribution to the community, to your tribe. And we have explicit goals for this, besides bringing revenue (like the strongest back should carry the heaviest burden).
100.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
Thats not at all a leason I learned during my years with game theory. It sounds like a life-lesson completely orthogonal to game-theory. And wrong I must add, ignoring people who have made an actuall change in the world (although its true t
101.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
Its not in their DNA, the don't get that large by making that kind of decisions.
102.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
(I agree with your comment. To add). Fairphone can be gotten with stock Android, but also "/e/OS", which is a fork of LineageOS, and presents itself as both more privacy focused and de-googled than stock Android. So it a
103.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
Honestly, Openzl looks even cooler! It would be cool to have it integrated with parquet and avro encoders. If I understand correctly the compressed files should be decompressable with standard tools.
104.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
Given the outcome in Venezuela (and Trumps relationships with dictators in generally), it don't seem like that is something Trump necessarily sees as a bad outcome. As long as the dictatorship trades oil and let some American companies
105.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
From the english letter: To achieve a better digital world, where technology works for people rather than against them, several steps must be taken: 1. Rebalance power between service providers and consumers. People should be allowed to c
106.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
But selfhosted Gitea, which OP chose, IS good for closed source. And codeberg is not.
107.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
My point is that this is the norm, not the exception in legal systems. It's good for laws to be clear cut and unambiguous, but in practice the world is not, and laws gets interpreted as courts use them.
108.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
In general the justice system don't care much what your idea of the law is. If its not clear through the actuall law or the accompanying comments what constitutes hate speech, it will be cleared up by the court itself.
109.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
He probably means a famous pirating site, called library dot something.
110.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
You mean the TV station lost broadcasting-rights, or you mean the website it actually banned? Cause the website is certainly accessible for me from my European country, although that does not rule out that it is banned in some European coun
111.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
> but tailors aren't even operating in that market. Not anymore.
112.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
Isn't tailors by and large already outcompeted by cheap new clothes?
113.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
Usually when one talk about sorting, without specifying closer, one means comparison sort [1], which indeed has an average-case lower bound of O(n*log(n)). In more special cases all kinds of other runtimes are possible. 1: https:/&#x
114.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
But with power the final product it's the same, the production method is different. So it's more like this: I make a product for 5 and sell it for 6. My production facility is maxed, but there is still much demand. So I (or someon
115.
▲
by
Epa095
8mo ago
That's just marginal pricing, which is the pricing in many (most?) markets. It just means that the price is determined by the price where the demand curve crosses the supply curve.
116.
▲
by
Epa095
9mo ago
I have been going partially down the same road, getting my own domain for email, so I can switch between providers (or self-host) in the future. A couple of notes: - You dont actually own the domain, you kind of lease it, and will have to p
117.
▲
by
Epa095
9mo ago
This is a good point. Made me think about how I will usually read if first, but in the browser. And it's easy for the server to check the user agent, and serve me a different version in the browser!
118.
▲
by
Epa095
9mo ago
Not many numbers in there. I would be interested in some measure of energy and effect per volume, e.g how many kWh of heat are we talking about at e.g 1 liter, and how fast (kW) can it produce it?
119.
▲
by
Epa095
9mo ago
On the other hand, there is not much office work which could not have been done almost as effective in office 97. I don't think the right explanation of MS monopoly is technical superiority, but rather the natural forces of monopoly. T
120.
▲
by
Epa095
9mo ago
'Nobody ever got fired for choosing IBM (now Microsoft)' has been an important factor around my neck of the woods. A cheaper European alternative would never even make it to the comparison. That is changing now though.
More ›