Eikon

7 ms·

61.
by Eikon 10mo ago
> (in the sense that they are not realizing their clients are down?) Their own website seems down too https://www.cloudflare.com/ -- 500 Internal Server Error cloudflare
62.
Static Certificate Transparency(merklemap.com)
16 points by Eikon 10mo ago|1 comments
63.
by Eikon 10mo ago
> What is the use case for implementing a POSIX filesystem on top of an object store? The use case is fully stateless infrastructure: your file/database servers become disposable and interchangeable (no "pets"), because al
64.
by Eikon 10mo ago
I've been using Minio in ZeroFS' [0] CI (a POSIX compliant filesystem that works on top of s3). I guess I'll switch to MicroCeph [1]. [0] https://github.com/Barre/ZeroFS [1] https://canonical-
65.
by Eikon 11mo ago
You definitely do have to worry about a schema. Except it’s ill defined and scattered across your business logic.
66.
by Eikon 11mo ago
R2 is very high latency with huge variance, definitely lower quality than S3. In my experience even backblaze b2 performs (way) better. Their community forums are full of such reports. KV is so expensive that it’s barely usable, and like R2
67.
by Eikon 1y ago
Doesn't support if-match.
68.
by Eikon 1y ago
make tinyconfig can get you pretty lean already. https://archive.kernel.org/oldwiki/tiny.wiki.kernel.org/
69.
by Eikon 1y ago
ZeroFS uses NFS/9P instead of fuse! https://github.com/Barre/ZeroFS
70.
by Eikon 1y ago
> If you're using ZFS for a load which resembles random block I/O, you'll want to tune the recordsize to the app I/O. You probably don't want to do that because that'll result in massive metadata overhead, a
71.
by Eikon 1y ago
You don’t have to use AWS S3, any compatible implementation will work.
72.
by Eikon 1y ago
The easy way to achieve that, is using ZeroFS NBD server with ZFS L2ARC (L2ARC with local storage and “main” pool on ZeroFS).
73.
by Eikon 1y ago
If you have the network that matches, it should be perfectly fine.
74.
by Eikon 1y ago
That should work!
75.
by Eikon 1y ago
I use Foyer in-memory (not hybrid) in ZeroFS [0] and had a great experience with it. The only quirk I’ve experienced is that in-memory and hybrid modes don’t share the same invalidation behavior. In hybrid mode, there’s no way to await a va
76.
by Eikon 1y ago
If SeaweedFS supports conditional PUTs, yes.
77.
by Eikon 1y ago
Shameless plug: https://github.com/Barre/ZeroFS I initially developed it for a usecase where I needed to store billions of tiny files, and it just requires a single s3 bucket as infrastructure.
78.
by Eikon 1y ago
It’s interesting how science can become closer to pseudoscience than proper research through paper-milling. It seems like that with such small groups and effects you could run the same “study” again and again until you get the result that y
79.
by Eikon 1y ago
Even though I don’t buy that LLMs are going to replace developers and quite agree with what is said, this is more of a critique of LLMs as English-to-code translators. LLMs are very useful for many other things. Researching concepts, for on
80.
by Eikon 1y ago
> For personal user, just don’t use things like S3 Why? > For business they won’t use things like this either. Again, why not?
81.
by Eikon 1y ago
Deku is great!
82.
by Eikon 1y ago
Unless I am missing something, rclone will probably compare similarly to https://www.zerofs.net/zerofs-vs-mountpoint-s3
83.
by Eikon 1y ago
> It still sucks that S3 is ~$20/mo/TB basically "in perpetuity", while random SSD drives are ~$80/TB and I'd feel comfortable effectively amortizing them out at ~$20/yr for local storage instead of $20
84.
by Eikon 1y ago
> I'm referring to one client being able to do 1000s of operations a second Again, I don't see any problems with "thousands of operations a second" if your single client is issuing parallel requests. Try any sequentia
85.
by Eikon 1y ago
There's an NFSv3 COMMIT operation, combined with a "durability" marker on writes. fsync could translate to COMMIT, but if writes are marked as "durable", COMMIT is not called by common clients, and if writes are mar
86.
by Eikon 1y ago
> Using something like ZeroFS could be a nice trick for getting decent price/performance on public cloud platforms. My only concern is integrity and durability: what testing have you done to validate that it doesn't lose data e
87.
by Eikon 1y ago
> You're also mounting it from Linux, which is just... weird. Nobody (for some values of nobody) does this. The sole purpose for this service is to provide backwards-compatible file shares for Windows servers and desktops. That&#x27
88.
by Eikon 1y ago
What's so bizarre about it? Are we prevented from implementing features when the platform itself provides adjacent tech? Page blobs are 2x+ more expensive ($0.045/GB vs $0.02/GB) and would require Azure-specific code. We don&
89.
by Eikon 1y ago
BuildBarn's nfsv4 server looks great! I'm not too sure about NFSv4 for ZeroFS specifically, the benefits don't seem _that_ obvious to me, especially compared to something like 9P, where server-side locking in the ".L&quo
90.
by Eikon 1y ago
There’s no on-disk write cache.

More ›