Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
EasyMark
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
811.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
They 100% set him up. A new block in the wall of proving that Trump is a Russian asset or dupe. I don't see how any other conclusion can be drawn by anyone paying attention. He consistently kisses up to Putin with little love messages
812.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
it sounds like Bezos is opposed to any opposing opinions to "free markets" and those won't be found on the editorial page any longer except for occasional opinions
813.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
newsweek does it fairly often, although they aren't necessarily famous authors.
814.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
you don't cancel something on short notice and not provide a follow up date. That's not the way any of this works. It's not "breathless", they literally picked an antivaxxer to head up the US government's healt
815.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
right I agree. Fox and MSNBC are relentlessly one-sided, though if you fact check the two you'll find that Fox is -heavily- the leader in misinformation. CNN has actually gotten quite a bit more centric and it's easy to spot parti
816.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
- personal liberties this is fine if he really means it. This is the most important thing we get from the Constitution recognizing our rights as humans. It remains to be seen if it's really just to copy what what Musk is doing at X whi
817.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
It's a new app, seems logical they might limit the audience at the start, with plans to expand in the future.
818.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
Yeah not sure what they're talking about. I'm not gonna buy a tesla because their quality is usually crap and mediocre when you "get a good build". Now with his shenanigans and experimentation with fascism and ignorance
819.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
Elon is Tesla, and his popularity is declining rapidly. I don't think it's a boycott, it just avoiding guilty by association driving a vehicle that is strongly associated with someone who is currently the biggest clown in Washingt
820.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
This has been exactly my take on the situation. 2 years ago, I followed his exploits and his companies. Now I skim articles about him at best mostly shaking my head. He went from a fellow tech bro to to tech no.
821.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
is there some fascist movement in Sweden that I haven't heard about?
822.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
It doesn't solve it, but it does make it much more difficult and should allow a 3rd party to get some power and possibly even a 4th one. I can see the republicans easily have a split of MAGA off as its own thing as more republicans gro
823.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
they aren't supposed to be influential, they are supposed to vote on laws.
824.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
~1000 would seem like a logical next step, would take out some of the money too.
825.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
This is why I wished all apps were backed by webapps of similar capabilities. I know that I personally see how it goes with the website first before I install an app. I prefer the browser sandbox by far to the phone OS
826.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
Also why does it matter if it's in an underground ex-mining facility or a basement in Washington? It matters how much does this cost vs a modern computerized system. Instead the big brains over at X act like this is how the entire gove
827.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
that's why you fix it, not act like you can just destroy it and what it does. It is also why you think practically and tell us, the voter, how much extra it is costing us over your "new and improved" program. Just lying about
828.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
his cuts are max 0.1% of government outlays, yet the MAGAs are acting like it's slash and burn and worshipping at the idol of their cult of personality(ies?) . Anyway it's so obvious to anyway who steps back and turns off the poli
829.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
1. I can't agree with this. We have AI to raise flags and we have computers to make payment and bookkeeping trivial. 2. we may or may not spend enough. what we don't do is collect enough taxes to pay for it, that is the failure.
830.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
All you have to do is read project 2025 and you will know all their plans and reasoning for Stage 1 of fascism
831.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
Sad to see the home of the magna carta slowly spiraling down into fascism and 1984. The government should be required to have a specific warrant to get at your personal data.
832.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
It's not the rust of 8-10 years ago, it's quite stable as a language now, and backward compatibility is stellar.
833.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
isn't that why you pick a particular subset, and exclude the rest of the language? It should be pretty easy to avoid using try/catch, especially in the kernel. A subset of C probably doesn't make much sense but for c++ which
834.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
I mean why does it have to be formally verified. Seems to me like the performance tradeoff for microkernels can be worth it to have drivers and other traditional kernel layer code, that don't bring down the system and can just be resta
835.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
or they can be adults and work it out. Sometimes you just ahve to put the kids in different sandboxes and keep them apart, that's why we have APIs and calling conventions.
836.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
I guess I simply don't understand why he's biased against rust folks using his API as long as they aren't mucking about on his lawn. Why does he care? If the API and calling conventions are adhered to it makes absolutely no d
837.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
sometimes things just become the thing to use from momentum. I've personally never been that picky about languages. I code in whatever they pay me to code in. I still code most of my personal projects in c++ and python though.
838.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
I have definitely done such things out of pettiness. Sometimes people just attract your attention as deserving of an attempt to humble them. I hope people will humble me as well when my vociferousness outstrips my talent. It's good to
839.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
You’re wrong, many jobs are protected by congressional law. The executive branch can’t do just anything he wants. Sure some agencies he can but now all. This shit was decided a long time ago and there are several laws covering it. Congress
840.
▲
by
EasyMark
2y ago
It’s important because it gives him 100% immunity from all actions that even slightly be adjacent to “executive branch” . Almost unlimited spectrum of activities are allowed including killing Americans for no good reason. Short of him walki
More ›