Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
EGreg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
151.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
It’s not about the companies specifically, or even AI specifically, but the incentive structure. I think the issue is more that they are embedded in a system of competition, where they can’t afford not to do things to “win” and fend off com
152.
▲
The Increasing State of Surveillance Simultaneously Around the World
(community.qbix.com)
5 points
by
EGreg
3mo ago
|
0 comments
153.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
I strongly believe that the future is the other way. New programming languages and environments designed for strong auditability and preventing bugs will dominate. Only bad actors will use latent space representation, and it might even be o
154.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
It seems their incentives aren’t exactly aligned with their users, including corporate users. Look at the latest statements from Alex Karp, and now Satya Nadella etc. Is this user-hostile? Encrypting stuff from the user is what RIAA used to
155.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Why don’t they also capture information you enter into forms on Chrome? They control the entire browser surface, technically they can know everything, even TLS and E2E encrypted data, that they silently phone home… If you think this is sill
156.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Why don’t they also read your gmail and get your bank passwords? And maybe have access to EVERY site actually, with “forgot password” type stuff in addition to providing oauth tokens…
157.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
This is what the problem is with DNS.
158.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Congratulations on putting it together! And you have spotted the early stage opposrtunity most VCs fail to fund: paradigm shifting work often looks like infrastructure, very broad and general-purpose. It can eventually lead to trillions of
159.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
I’m right here Been building about 20 interconnected pieces of a new software stack designed to help humanity. Most VCs wouldn’t fund it. Most investors wouldn’t understand it. They prefer small apps. YC’s startups used to be called “featur
160.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
https://safebots.github.io/Safecloud
161.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
"There is nothing wrong with capitalism, but..." - said before any potential criticism of capitalism. In USA, you shall not criticize the Profit. "peace be upon him" - said after any mention of Mohammad. In Saudi Arabia,
162.
▲
Generalizing LLMs to PLTs: Probabilistic Language Tries
(arxiv.org)
1 points
by
EGreg
3mo ago
|
0 comments
163.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Unless they have backdoors to absolutely every form of encryption, including https certificates, etc. you can always use that to tunnel through. https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/cukcaf/goo
164.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
For some reason it made me think of this right away: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words
165.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
I do not believe solutions to these issues will be found with government regulators. I believe they can be enabled by new technology that is designed to balance interests on all sides and actually enforce the guarantees IN CODE AND PROTOCOL
166.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
The "banned" Differential Privacy refers to this: https://www.npr.org/2026/06/12/nx-s1-5855734/census-bureau-d...
167.
▲
Trump admin banned Differential Privacy in Census. How to report privately [pdf]
(magarshak.com)
3 points
by
EGreg
3mo ago
|
1 comments
168.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Exactly this. The correct way is to have M of N signatures on specific package manager pinned versions. And you trust the auditors to look at each new version, of a well-known package. We should start a project and get it funded, to do just
169.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Wait, state laws can restrict you using software on your own general-purpose computer? Does that infringe on freedom of speech?
170.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
What about the famous case of Carlsen claiming that his opponent cheated and even forfeiting to draw attention to it?
171.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
One major trick in distributed systems is to always attempt things in the same order. And then locally, you just store what you’ve seen, for “a long time”. That takes care of a lot of transactional issues — idempotency, retries, exactly-onc
172.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
We've had peer-to-peer livestreaming for years, on the platform. Here is a video of how it works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nh0cewsyJlw The code is here: https://github.com/Qbix/Media Peer t
173.
▲
Safecloud – a free, decentralized and federated video streaming platform
(helpnetsecurity.com)
7 points
by
EGreg
3mo ago
|
3 comments
174.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
This does: https://safebots.github.io/Safecloud I designed it in order to stream videos and get paid without worrying about getting deplatformed Two weeks ago it was covered in a respected security publication: https:/
175.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Did you read the academic paper? It proves otherwise. Yes, the government already knows your age, it gives you a driver's license for example. We're not talking about erasing their memory or databases. We're talking about you
176.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
In this scenario, Google is still a trusted dealer. I just posted a general solution anyone can implement without needing Google as the trusted dealer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760492
177.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Then I guess you'll be violating laws. I'm talking about complying with laws, in a privacy-preserving way. It's possible. Here, I posted it on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760492
178.
▲
The proper way to verify age & other attributes without revealing identity [pdf]
(magarshak.com)
2 points
by
EGreg
3mo ago
|
2 comments
179.
▲
Age Checks That Do NOT Leak Identity: Privacy-Preserving Attribute Verification [pdf]
(magarshak.com)
3 points
by
EGreg
3mo ago
|
0 comments
180.
▲
by
EGreg
3mo ago
Google has pioneered a few technologies where they are the trusted dealer. For example, Private State Tokens. I have written a paper on how to do age verification in a completely privacy-preserving way, and it doesn’t even need zero-knowled
More ›