Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
EForEndeavour
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Isn't the whole point of OP that we're currently watching the barrier to generating realistic assets go from "spend months grinding Photoshop tutorials" to "type what you want into this box and wait a few minutes&qu
32.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Thank you for sharing some sources. To refute your first one: - Jane Goodall in this 36-second clip does NOT advocate reducing the global population down to 450 million - Jane Goodall speaking at a 2020 WEF panel does NOT imply that the WEF
33.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
I mean this genuinely: why do you choose to quote and trust some unreferenced and completely arbitrary 500 million population number that some bizarre unidentified group of people with zero accountability carved into a random stone monument
34.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
I didn't. It's physically impossible for any perception of emotion or anything else to travel between organisms without the flow of information. Am I missing something?
35.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
> But communication is not only, or even primarily, about information. It is about emotion, about establishing our presence and developing or reinforcing a connection. When you ask someone “How are you?” do you honestly care? I got that
36.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
So falsify and/or misrepresent evidence just long enough to fool a jury. If the ruse is discovered one minute after conviction, who cares? Person's convicted now, doesn't matter? With the caveat that this is coming from someo
37.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
So conviction is a "trap door" of evidence weight? If someone is convicted based on evidence that is later shown to be totally insufficient to support that conviction, this new information does nothing to overturn the conviction?
38.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Maybe I'm a prude, but this page made me consciously register how pervasive the suffix "porn" has become in decidedly non-pornographic contexts. "EarthPorn", "SpacePorn", etc. are understood to mean gratui
39.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
I would say not much, given regular homeschooling is an intentional choice that self-selects families willing to put in the research and effort to homeschool.
40.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
I see what you're getting at, but in your analogy, Leonardo da Vinci (the creative and intellectual driver of the overall work) maps to the black-box LLM behind an API, where the boilerplate web app wrapper maps to the Mona Lisa's
41.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Just so I understand: this HN post consists of a 6-sentence plain English prompt, and a web app that passes the prompt plus presumably raw user input to a black box LLM API? Is there more?
42.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
That's ingenious: the technology simultaneously makes and breaks the scam. The cleverest business name idea that comes to mind is also the one most likely to get this comment deleted: consider the Scunthorpian[1] business name Cunterm
43.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
How did you monitor your apnea before and after your posture correction? And how does one's standing posture affect breathing when lying horizontally -- is it a matter of breathing muscle strength?
44.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Where are you getting the specific values of 6 months and ±2% out 10 years? Genuinely curious to learn more. Maybe back-testing of archived predictions from prior decades against the eventual reality?
45.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
How far into the future do you think population growth can be reasonably predicted, and why?
46.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Do you mean caffeine in chocolate?
47.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
> Reminder once again that "accuracy" is irrelevant in the real-world. Accuracy and other quantitative performance metrics are imperfect for sure, but how else do you propose testing before real-world deployment? How do you pro
48.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Peculiar issues are by definition less common than the usual issues, so you're more likely to have a common issue than a peculiar one.
49.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Not the new voice interface, no: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1d80q59/openai_jus...
50.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Oops. TIL I've been doing it wrong for years. Thank you for sharing this tip!
51.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Treat the credit card as a middleman between your actual cash (e.g., a checking account) and spending. Spend as if it's cash. Pay balance weekly to avoid ever paying interest. Enjoy far superior fraud protection, and an effective disco
52.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Then it's in our interest to push the use of AI to support the meeting class to dictate stream-of-consciousness updates and get a cleaned up memo ready for email. But of course, this risks reducing the (self?)-perceived importance of d
53.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
The extreme ends of the individual-collective continuum (complete lack of laws in favor of autonomy and personal responsibility vs. overbearing legal/regulatory intervention that undermines autonomy) make it clear that real life needs
54.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Maybe I'm missing this: what led to the statement that people are seriously overprotective of any and all children? This thread is pointing out that kids who can't swim are allowed in pools, which is dangerous and leads to prevent
55.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
> IMO this is getting at a deeper truth that the use of a gender in language, and historically defaulting to "he", was not about creating a bias, but instead it was a pattern which maximises information density and minimises us
56.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
That's beside the point of the comment I replied to, which falsely said homeopathic products were classified as dietary supplements.
57.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Very much false. 1. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, homeopathic products are subject to the same requirements related to approval, adulteration and misbranding as other drug products. https://www.fda.gov/dr
58.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
> Canada's wildfires last years polluted more than all antropic emission combined That's inaccurate, and not what the article says. The article quotes research saying the 2023 wildfires added 3 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosp
59.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Baader-Meinhof strikes again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion
60.
▲
by
EForEndeavour
2y ago
Where could I read more about the distinction between peak oil extraction and production, and the prediction you mention of peak oil extraction next year?
More ›